Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Have Tegra's GPIO chip depend explicitly on the pinctrl device

[Thierry Reding <thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 926 bytes --]

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:29:53AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> these three patches make sure that there's an explicit dependency from
> the GPIO chip in Tegra SoCs to the corresponding pinctrl device, without
> having duplicated gpio ranges.
> 
> By having an explicit dependency, we can do things such as probing the
> pinctrl device before the GPIO chip device to avoid deferred probes.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Tomeu
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Don't defer probe if the pinctrl node is disabled
> - Remove outdated comment from the commit changelog
> 
> Tomeu Vizoso (3):
>   gpio: defer probe if pinctrl cannot be found
>   pinctrl: tegra: Only set the gpio range if needed
>   ARM: tegra: Add gpio-ranges property

Patches 2 and 3 applied to the Tegra tree. Linus, I've applied the
pinctrl patch to a separate branch, so we could use that to resolve
conflicts, should there be any.

Thierry

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]