All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@arm.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	"suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"grant.likely@linaro.org" <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, "agraf@suse.de" <agraf@suse.de>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] PCI: pci-host-generic: Fix lookup of linux,pci-probe-only property
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:01:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150817090132.GC1688@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAErSpo5abs2Qj25Bs+JVg87ve346f_RVz7jhNwqdv856+WvXQA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 09:26:21PM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 05:40:51PM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >> Do we need support for pci-probe-only in pci-host-generic at all?
> >> You're removing the use in amd-overdrive.dts, and there are no other
> >> DTs in the kernel tree that mention it.
> >>
> >> If we can live without it, that would be nice.  It seems like a relic from
> >> days when we couldn't reliably assign resources.  (I'm not saying we can do
> >> that reliably even today, but I'd rather make it reliable than turn it
> >> off.)
> >
> > Kvmtool certainly uses it (and generates its own DT, hence why you don't
> > see it in mainline). Not sure about qemu, though.
> 
> Do you know why kvmtool wants probe-only?  Would something break if we
> didn't support probe-only?  I guess we'd be looking for a case where
> Linux assigns resources and that assignment doesn't work with kvmtool?

It's basically because the BARs aren't writable other than to find the
region size. It could fixed with a bit of pain, but it doesn't help older
kvmtools that do work with mainline today.

Will

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] PCI: pci-host-generic: Fix lookup of linux,pci-probe-only property
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:01:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150817090132.GC1688@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAErSpo5abs2Qj25Bs+JVg87ve346f_RVz7jhNwqdv856+WvXQA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 09:26:21PM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 05:40:51PM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >> Do we need support for pci-probe-only in pci-host-generic at all?
> >> You're removing the use in amd-overdrive.dts, and there are no other
> >> DTs in the kernel tree that mention it.
> >>
> >> If we can live without it, that would be nice.  It seems like a relic from
> >> days when we couldn't reliably assign resources.  (I'm not saying we can do
> >> that reliably even today, but I'd rather make it reliable than turn it
> >> off.)
> >
> > Kvmtool certainly uses it (and generates its own DT, hence why you don't
> > see it in mainline). Not sure about qemu, though.
> 
> Do you know why kvmtool wants probe-only?  Would something break if we
> didn't support probe-only?  I guess we'd be looking for a case where
> Linux assigns resources and that assignment doesn't work with kvmtool?

It's basically because the BARs aren't writable other than to find the
region size. It could fixed with a bit of pain, but it doesn't help older
kvmtools that do work with mainline today.

Will

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt
	<benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe-Gsx/Oe8HsFggBc27wqDAHg@public.gmane.org>,
	"suravee.suthikulpanit-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org"
	<suravee.suthikulpanit-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi
	<Lorenzo.Pieralisi-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	"grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org"
	<grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	"agraf-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org"
	<agraf-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org"
	<linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	"devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] PCI: pci-host-generic: Fix lookup of linux,pci-probe-only property
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:01:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150817090132.GC1688@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAErSpo5abs2Qj25Bs+JVg87ve346f_RVz7jhNwqdv856+WvXQA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>

On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 09:26:21PM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 05:40:51PM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >> Do we need support for pci-probe-only in pci-host-generic at all?
> >> You're removing the use in amd-overdrive.dts, and there are no other
> >> DTs in the kernel tree that mention it.
> >>
> >> If we can live without it, that would be nice.  It seems like a relic from
> >> days when we couldn't reliably assign resources.  (I'm not saying we can do
> >> that reliably even today, but I'd rather make it reliable than turn it
> >> off.)
> >
> > Kvmtool certainly uses it (and generates its own DT, hence why you don't
> > see it in mainline). Not sure about qemu, though.
> 
> Do you know why kvmtool wants probe-only?  Would something break if we
> didn't support probe-only?  I guess we'd be looking for a case where
> Linux assigns resources and that assignment doesn't work with kvmtool?

It's basically because the BARs aren't writable other than to find the
region size. It could fixed with a bit of pain, but it doesn't help older
kvmtools that do work with mainline today.

Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-17  9:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-14 16:19 [PATCH v2 0/4] PCI: arm64/powerpc: Fix parsing of linux,pci-probe-only Marc Zyngier
2015-08-14 16:19 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-14 16:19 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] PCI: arm64/powerpc: Fix parsing of linux, pci-probe-only Marc Zyngier
2015-08-14 16:19 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-14 16:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] of/pci: Add of_pci_check_probe_only to parse "linux,pci-probe-only" Marc Zyngier
2015-08-14 16:19   ` [PATCH v2 1/4] of/pci: Add of_pci_check_probe_only to parse "linux, pci-probe-only" Marc Zyngier
2015-08-14 16:19   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-14 21:08   ` [PATCH v2 1/4] of/pci: Add of_pci_check_probe_only to parse "linux,pci-probe-only" Rob Herring
2015-08-14 21:08     ` [PATCH v2 1/4] of/pci: Add of_pci_check_probe_only to parse "linux, pci-probe-only" Rob Herring
2015-08-14 21:08     ` Rob Herring
2015-09-02 22:23     ` [PATCH v2 1/4] of/pci: Add of_pci_check_probe_only to parse "linux,pci-probe-only" Bjorn Helgaas
2015-09-02 22:23       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-09-03  8:18       ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-03  8:18         ` [PATCH v2 1/4] of/pci: Add of_pci_check_probe_only to parse "linux, pci-probe-only" Marc Zyngier
2015-09-03  8:18         ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-14 16:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] PCI: pci-host-generic: Fix lookup of linux,pci-probe-only property Marc Zyngier
2015-08-14 16:19   ` [PATCH v2 2/4] PCI: pci-host-generic: Fix lookup of linux, pci-probe-only property Marc Zyngier
2015-08-14 16:19   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-14 16:40   ` [PATCH v2 2/4] PCI: pci-host-generic: Fix lookup of linux,pci-probe-only property Bjorn Helgaas
2015-08-14 16:40     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-08-14 16:43     ` Will Deacon
2015-08-14 16:43       ` Will Deacon
2015-08-14 16:50       ` Alexander Graf
2015-08-14 16:50         ` [PATCH v2 2/4] PCI: pci-host-generic: Fix lookup of linux, pci-probe-only property Alexander Graf
2015-08-14 16:50         ` Alexander Graf
2015-08-14 20:26       ` [PATCH v2 2/4] PCI: pci-host-generic: Fix lookup of linux,pci-probe-only property Bjorn Helgaas
2015-08-14 20:26         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-08-14 20:26         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-08-17  9:01         ` Will Deacon [this message]
2015-08-17  9:01           ` Will Deacon
2015-08-17  9:01           ` Will Deacon
2015-08-14 16:45   ` Will Deacon
2015-08-14 16:45     ` Will Deacon
2015-08-14 16:45     ` Will Deacon
2015-08-14 16:19 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] powerpc: PCI: " Marc Zyngier
2015-08-14 16:19   ` [PATCH v2 3/4] powerpc: PCI: Fix lookup of linux, pci-probe-only property Marc Zyngier
2015-08-14 16:19   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-14 16:19   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-14 16:19 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: dts: Drop linux,pci-probe-only from the Seattle DTS Marc Zyngier
2015-08-14 16:19   ` [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: dts: Drop linux, pci-probe-only " Marc Zyngier
2015-08-14 16:19   ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150817090132.GC1688@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=Marc.Zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.