From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for v4.2] Revert "drm/i915: Allow parsing of variable size child device entries from VBT"
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 20:00:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150818170040.GL5176@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKMK7uH0wNyKei4GNasri819h=maK0MqiuwdFLKpDthQG=2m8A@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 09:58:57AM -0700, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:33 AM, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> wrote:
> > This reverts
> >
> > commit 047fe6e6db9161e69271f56daaafdaf2add023b1
> > Author: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@linux.intel.com>
> > Date: Tue Aug 4 16:55:52 2015 +0300
> >
> > drm/i915: Allow parsing of variable size child device entries from VBT
> >
> > That commit is not valid for v4.2, however it will be valid for v4.3. It
> > was simply queued too early.
>
> Nope, this patch from David also incidentally fixes a regression from
> 90e4f1592bb6e82f6690f0e05a8aadc which is why I merged it to.
What regression?
> If you
> want to revert this, you need to revert more (and with that also break
> BSW).
>
> Isn't there a more minimal fix we can do for 4.2?
> -Daniel
>
> >
> > The referenced regressing commit is just fine until the size of struct
> > common_child_dev_config changes, and that won't happen until
> > v4.3. Indeed, the expected size checks here rely on the increased size
> > of the struct, breaking new platforms.
> >
> > Fixes: 047fe6e6db91 ("drm/i915: Allow parsing of variable size child device entries from VBT")
> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
> > Cc: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > There was another patch from David increasing the size of the struct
> > [1], but that then regresses sdvo mapping parsing. It's the simplest to
> > just revert and fix this up properly for v4.3.
> >
> > [1] http://mid.gmane.org/20150813131415.GO6150@boom
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c | 27 ++++-----------------------
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
> > index 3dcd59e694db..198fc3c3291b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
> > @@ -1075,34 +1075,15 @@ parse_device_mapping(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > const union child_device_config *p_child;
> > union child_device_config *child_dev_ptr;
> > int i, child_device_num, count;
> > - u8 expected_size;
> > - u16 block_size;
> > + u16 block_size;
> >
> > p_defs = find_section(bdb, BDB_GENERAL_DEFINITIONS);
> > if (!p_defs) {
> > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("No general definition block is found, no devices defined.\n");
> > return;
> > }
> > - if (bdb->version < 195) {
> > - expected_size = 33;
> > - } else if (bdb->version == 195) {
> > - expected_size = 37;
> > - } else if (bdb->version <= 197) {
> > - expected_size = 38;
> > - } else {
> > - expected_size = 38;
> > - DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Expected child_device_config size for BDB version %u not known; assuming %u\n",
> > - expected_size, bdb->version);
> > - }
> > -
> > - if (expected_size > sizeof(*p_child)) {
> > - DRM_ERROR("child_device_config cannot fit in p_child\n");
> > - return;
> > - }
> > -
> > - if (p_defs->child_dev_size != expected_size) {
> > - DRM_ERROR("Size mismatch; child_device_config size=%u (expected %u); bdb->version: %u\n",
> > - p_defs->child_dev_size, expected_size, bdb->version);
> > + if (p_defs->child_dev_size < sizeof(*p_child)) {
> > + DRM_ERROR("General definiton block child device size is too small.\n");
> > return;
> > }
> > /* get the block size of general definitions */
> > @@ -1149,7 +1130,7 @@ parse_device_mapping(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >
> > child_dev_ptr = dev_priv->vbt.child_dev + count;
> > count++;
> > - memcpy(child_dev_ptr, p_child, p_defs->child_dev_size);
> > + memcpy(child_dev_ptr, p_child, sizeof(*p_child));
> > }
> > return;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.1.4
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-18 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-18 9:33 [PATCH for v4.2] Revert "drm/i915: Allow parsing of variable size child device entries from VBT" Jani Nikula
2015-08-18 11:15 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-08-18 16:58 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-08-18 17:00 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2015-08-18 21:00 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-08-19 2:34 ` Jani Nikula
2015-08-19 6:58 ` Jani Nikula
2015-08-19 8:17 ` Mika Kahola
2015-08-19 8:40 ` Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150818170040.GL5176@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.