From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Kevin Hao <haokexin@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] jump_label: no need to acquire the jump_label_mutex in jump_lable_init()
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 20:29:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150820182903.GA3161@worktop.event.rightround.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1440072876-8321-2-git-send-email-haokexin@gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 08:14:29PM +0800, Kevin Hao wrote:
> The jump_label_init() run in a very early stage, even before the
> sched_init(). So there is no chance for concurrent access of the
> jump label table.
It also doesn't hurt to have it. Its better to be consistent and
conservative with locking unless there is a pressing need.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-20 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-20 12:14 [PATCH 0/8] powerpc: use jump label for {cpu,mmu}_has_feature() Kevin Hao
2015-08-20 12:14 ` [PATCH 1/8] jump_label: no need to acquire the jump_label_mutex in jump_lable_init() Kevin Hao
2015-08-20 18:29 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-08-21 3:17 ` Kevin Hao
2015-08-20 12:14 ` [PATCH 2/8] jump_label: make it possible for the archs to invoke jump_label_init() much earlier Kevin Hao
2015-08-20 12:14 ` [PATCH 3/8] jump_label: introduce DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_{TRUE, FALSE}_ARRAY macros Kevin Hao
2015-08-20 12:14 ` [PATCH 3/8] jump_label: introduce DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_{TRUE,FALSE}_ARRAY macros Kevin Hao
2015-08-20 18:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-21 3:23 ` Kevin Hao
2015-08-21 6:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-08-21 6:34 ` Kevin Hao
2015-08-21 6:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-08-21 6:45 ` Kevin Hao
2015-08-20 12:14 ` [PATCH 4/8] powerpc: invoke jump_label_init() in a much earlier stage Kevin Hao
2015-08-20 12:14 ` [PATCH 5/8] powerpc: kill mfvtb() Kevin Hao
2015-08-20 12:14 ` [PATCH 6/8] powerpc: move the cpu_has_feature to a separate file Kevin Hao
2015-08-20 12:14 ` [PATCH 7/8] powerpc: use the jump label for cpu_has_feature Kevin Hao
2015-08-20 12:14 ` [PATCH 8/8] powerpc: use jump label for mmu_has_feature Kevin Hao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150820182903.GA3161@worktop.event.rightround.com \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=haokexin@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.