From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
Cc: vyasevic@redhat.com, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, wkok@cumulusnetworks.com,
davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH net-next v2] bridge: vlan: allow to suppress local mac install for all vlans
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 17:56:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150825175627.66ca9f30@urahara> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1440549295-3979-1-git-send-email-razor@blackwall.org>
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 17:34:55 -0700
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org> wrote:
> From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
>
> This patch adds a new knob that, when enabled, allows to suppress the
> installation of local fdb entries in newly created vlans. This could
> pose a big scalability issue if we have a large number of ports and a
> large number of vlans, e.g. in a 48 port device with 2000 vlans these
> entries easily go up to 96000.
> Note that packets for these macs are still received properly because they
> are added in vlan 0 as "own" macs and referenced when fdb lookup by vlan
> results in a miss.
> Also note that vlan membership of ingress port and the bridge device
> as egress are still being correctly enforced.
>
> The default (0/off) is keeping the current behaviour.
>
> Based on a patch by Wilson Kok (wkok@cumulusnetworks.com).
This is getting messy, but then again the bridge seems to have become
a ghetto for a long time. I would rather see the lookup code fixed so
that the fdb was correct.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
Cc: vyasevic@redhat.com, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, wkok@cumulusnetworks.com,
davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] bridge: vlan: allow to suppress local mac install for all vlans
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 17:56:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150825175627.66ca9f30@urahara> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1440549295-3979-1-git-send-email-razor@blackwall.org>
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 17:34:55 -0700
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org> wrote:
> From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
>
> This patch adds a new knob that, when enabled, allows to suppress the
> installation of local fdb entries in newly created vlans. This could
> pose a big scalability issue if we have a large number of ports and a
> large number of vlans, e.g. in a 48 port device with 2000 vlans these
> entries easily go up to 96000.
> Note that packets for these macs are still received properly because they
> are added in vlan 0 as "own" macs and referenced when fdb lookup by vlan
> results in a miss.
> Also note that vlan membership of ingress port and the bridge device
> as egress are still being correctly enforced.
>
> The default (0/off) is keeping the current behaviour.
>
> Based on a patch by Wilson Kok (wkok@cumulusnetworks.com).
This is getting messy, but then again the bridge seems to have become
a ghetto for a long time. I would rather see the lookup code fixed so
that the fdb was correct.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-26 0:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-26 0:34 [Bridge] [PATCH net-next v2] bridge: vlan: allow to suppress local mac install for all vlans Nikolay Aleksandrov
2015-08-26 0:34 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2015-08-26 0:56 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2015-08-26 0:56 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-08-26 5:42 ` [Bridge] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2015-08-26 5:42 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2015-08-26 0:58 ` [Bridge] " Stephen Hemminger
2015-08-26 0:58 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-08-26 2:42 ` [Bridge] " David Miller
2015-08-26 2:42 ` David Miller
2015-08-26 5:28 ` [Bridge] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2015-08-26 5:28 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2015-08-26 6:06 ` [Bridge] " David Miller
2015-08-26 6:06 ` David Miller
2015-08-26 11:33 ` [Bridge] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2015-08-26 11:33 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2015-08-27 4:57 ` [Bridge] " roopa
2015-08-27 4:57 ` roopa
2015-08-27 21:02 ` [Bridge] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2015-08-27 21:02 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2015-08-27 23:47 ` [Bridge] " Vlad Yasevich
2015-08-27 23:47 ` Vlad Yasevich
2015-08-28 2:17 ` [Bridge] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2015-08-28 2:17 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2015-08-28 12:31 ` [Bridge] " Vlad Yasevich
2015-08-28 12:31 ` Vlad Yasevich
2015-08-28 15:26 ` [Bridge] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2015-08-28 15:26 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2015-08-29 1:11 ` [Bridge] " Vlad Yasevich
2015-08-29 1:11 ` Vlad Yasevich
2015-09-13 13:22 ` [Bridge] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2015-09-13 13:22 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2015-08-26 6:10 ` [Bridge] " B Viswanath
2015-08-26 6:10 ` B Viswanath
2015-08-26 12:52 ` [Bridge] " Vlad Yasevich
2015-08-26 12:52 ` Vlad Yasevich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150825175627.66ca9f30@urahara \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=vyasevic@redhat.com \
--cc=wkok@cumulusnetworks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.