[PATCH] arm64: fix bug for reloading FPSIMD state after execve on cpu 0.

[PATCH] arm64: fix bug for reloading FPSIMD state after execve on cpu 0.

[Chunyan Zhang]

From: Janet Liu <janet.liu@spreadtrum.com>

If process A is running on CPU 0 and do execve syscall and after sched_exec,
dest_cpu is 0, fpsimd_state.cpu is 0. If at the time Process A get scheduled
out and after some kernel threads running on CPU 0, process A is back in CPU 0,
A's fpsimd_state.cpu is current cpu id "0", and per_cpu(fpsimd_last_state)
points A's fpsimd_state, TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE will be clear, kernel will not
reload the context during it return to userspace. so set the cpu's
fpsimd_last_state to NULL to avoid this.

Signed-off-by: Janet Liu <janet.liu@spreadtrum.com>
Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@spreadtrum.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
index 44d6f75..ec58d94 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
@@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ void fpsimd_flush_thread(void)
 {
 	memset(&current->thread.fpsimd_state, 0, sizeof(struct fpsimd_state));
 	set_thread_flag(TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE);
+	this_cpu_write(fpsimd_last_state, NULL);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
1.7.9.5

[PATCH] arm64: fix bug for reloading FPSIMD state after execve on cpu 0.

[Chunyan Zhang]

From: Janet Liu <janet.liu@spreadtrum.com>

If process A is running on CPU 0 and do execve syscall and after sched_exec,
dest_cpu is 0, fpsimd_state.cpu is 0. If at the time Process A get scheduled
out and after some kernel threads running on CPU 0, process A is back in CPU 0,
A's fpsimd_state.cpu is current cpu id "0", and per_cpu(fpsimd_last_state)
points A's fpsimd_state, TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE will be clear, kernel will not
reload the context during it return to userspace. so set the cpu's
fpsimd_last_state to NULL to avoid this.

Signed-off-by: Janet Liu <janet.liu@spreadtrum.com>
Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@spreadtrum.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
index 44d6f75..ec58d94 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
@@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ void fpsimd_flush_thread(void)
 {
 	memset(&current->thread.fpsimd_state, 0, sizeof(struct fpsimd_state));
 	set_thread_flag(TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE);
+	this_cpu_write(fpsimd_last_state, NULL);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
1.7.9.5

[PATCH] arm64: fix bug for reloading FPSIMD state after execve on cpu 0.

[Will Deacon]

Hello,

[adding Ard]

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 03:40:41AM +0100, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
> From: Janet Liu <janet.liu@spreadtrum.com>
> 
> If process A is running on CPU 0 and do execve syscall and after sched_exec,
> dest_cpu is 0, fpsimd_state.cpu is 0. If at the time Process A get scheduled
> out and after some kernel threads running on CPU 0, process A is back in CPU 0,
> A's fpsimd_state.cpu is current cpu id "0", and per_cpu(fpsimd_last_state)
> points A's fpsimd_state, TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE will be clear, kernel will not
> reload the context during it return to userspace. so set the cpu's
> fpsimd_last_state to NULL to avoid this.

AFAICT, this is only a problem if one of the kernel threads uses the fpsimd
registers, right? However, kernel_neon_begin_partial clobbers
fpsimd_last_state, so I'm struggling to see the problem.

Are you seeing an issue in practice?

Will

> Signed-off-by: Janet Liu <janet.liu@spreadtrum.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@spreadtrum.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c |    1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> index 44d6f75..ec58d94 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> @@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ void fpsimd_flush_thread(void)
>  {
>  	memset(&current->thread.fpsimd_state, 0, sizeof(struct fpsimd_state));
>  	set_thread_flag(TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE);
> +	this_cpu_write(fpsimd_last_state, NULL);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 

Re: [PATCH] arm64: fix bug for reloading FPSIMD state after execve on cpu 0.

[Will Deacon]

Hello,

[adding Ard]

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 03:40:41AM +0100, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
> From: Janet Liu <janet.liu@spreadtrum.com>
> 
> If process A is running on CPU 0 and do execve syscall and after sched_exec,
> dest_cpu is 0, fpsimd_state.cpu is 0. If at the time Process A get scheduled
> out and after some kernel threads running on CPU 0, process A is back in CPU 0,
> A's fpsimd_state.cpu is current cpu id "0", and per_cpu(fpsimd_last_state)
> points A's fpsimd_state, TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE will be clear, kernel will not
> reload the context during it return to userspace. so set the cpu's
> fpsimd_last_state to NULL to avoid this.

AFAICT, this is only a problem if one of the kernel threads uses the fpsimd
registers, right? However, kernel_neon_begin_partial clobbers
fpsimd_last_state, so I'm struggling to see the problem.

Are you seeing an issue in practice?

Will

> Signed-off-by: Janet Liu <janet.liu@spreadtrum.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@spreadtrum.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c |    1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> index 44d6f75..ec58d94 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> @@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ void fpsimd_flush_thread(void)
>  {
>  	memset(&current->thread.fpsimd_state, 0, sizeof(struct fpsimd_state));
>  	set_thread_flag(TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE);
> +	this_cpu_write(fpsimd_last_state, NULL);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 

[PATCH] arm64: fix bug for reloading FPSIMD state after execve on cpu 0.

[Ard Biesheuvel]

On 26 August 2015 at 13:12, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> [adding Ard]
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 03:40:41AM +0100, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
>> From: Janet Liu <janet.liu@spreadtrum.com>
>>
>> If process A is running on CPU 0 and do execve syscall and after sched_exec,
>> dest_cpu is 0, fpsimd_state.cpu is 0. If at the time Process A get scheduled
>> out and after some kernel threads running on CPU 0, process A is back in CPU 0,
>> A's fpsimd_state.cpu is current cpu id "0", and per_cpu(fpsimd_last_state)
>> points A's fpsimd_state, TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE will be clear, kernel will not
>> reload the context during it return to userspace. so set the cpu's
>> fpsimd_last_state to NULL to avoid this.
>
> AFAICT, this is only a problem if one of the kernel threads uses the fpsimd
> registers, right? However, kernel_neon_begin_partial clobbers
> fpsimd_last_state, so I'm struggling to see the problem.
>

I think the problem is real, but it would be better to set the
fpsimd_state::cpu field to an invalid value like we do in
fpsimd_flush_task_state()

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
index 44d6f7545505..c56956a16d3f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
@@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ void fpsimd_thread_switch(struct task_struct *next)
 void fpsimd_flush_thread(void)
 {
        memset(&current->thread.fpsimd_state, 0, sizeof(struct fpsimd_state));
+       fpsimd_flush_task_state(current);
        set_thread_flag(TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE);
 }

(note the memset erroneously initializes that field to CPU 0)

This more accurately reflects the state of the process after forking,
i.e., that its FPSIMD state has never been loaded into any CPU.

-- 
Ard.

> Are you seeing an issue in practice?
>
> Will
>
>> Signed-off-by: Janet Liu <janet.liu@spreadtrum.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@spreadtrum.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c |    1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
>> index 44d6f75..ec58d94 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
>> @@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ void fpsimd_flush_thread(void)
>>  {
>>       memset(&current->thread.fpsimd_state, 0, sizeof(struct fpsimd_state));
>>       set_thread_flag(TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE);
>> +     this_cpu_write(fpsimd_last_state, NULL);
>>  }
>>
>>  /*
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>>

Re: [PATCH] arm64: fix bug for reloading FPSIMD state after execve on cpu 0.

[Ard Biesheuvel]

On 26 August 2015 at 13:12, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> [adding Ard]
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 03:40:41AM +0100, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
>> From: Janet Liu <janet.liu@spreadtrum.com>
>>
>> If process A is running on CPU 0 and do execve syscall and after sched_exec,
>> dest_cpu is 0, fpsimd_state.cpu is 0. If at the time Process A get scheduled
>> out and after some kernel threads running on CPU 0, process A is back in CPU 0,
>> A's fpsimd_state.cpu is current cpu id "0", and per_cpu(fpsimd_last_state)
>> points A's fpsimd_state, TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE will be clear, kernel will not
>> reload the context during it return to userspace. so set the cpu's
>> fpsimd_last_state to NULL to avoid this.
>
> AFAICT, this is only a problem if one of the kernel threads uses the fpsimd
> registers, right? However, kernel_neon_begin_partial clobbers
> fpsimd_last_state, so I'm struggling to see the problem.
>

I think the problem is real, but it would be better to set the
fpsimd_state::cpu field to an invalid value like we do in
fpsimd_flush_task_state()

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
index 44d6f7545505..c56956a16d3f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
@@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ void fpsimd_thread_switch(struct task_struct *next)
 void fpsimd_flush_thread(void)
 {
        memset(&current->thread.fpsimd_state, 0, sizeof(struct fpsimd_state));
+       fpsimd_flush_task_state(current);
        set_thread_flag(TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE);
 }

(note the memset erroneously initializes that field to CPU 0)

This more accurately reflects the state of the process after forking,
i.e., that its FPSIMD state has never been loaded into any CPU.

-- 
Ard.

> Are you seeing an issue in practice?
>
> Will
>
>> Signed-off-by: Janet Liu <janet.liu@spreadtrum.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@spreadtrum.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c |    1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
>> index 44d6f75..ec58d94 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
>> @@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ void fpsimd_flush_thread(void)
>>  {
>>       memset(&current->thread.fpsimd_state, 0, sizeof(struct fpsimd_state));
>>       set_thread_flag(TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE);
>> +     this_cpu_write(fpsimd_last_state, NULL);
>>  }
>>
>>  /*
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>>

[PATCH] arm64: fix bug for reloading FPSIMD state after execve on cpu 0.

[Will Deacon]

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 12:32:03PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 26 August 2015 at 13:12, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 03:40:41AM +0100, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
> >> From: Janet Liu <janet.liu@spreadtrum.com>
> >>
> >> If process A is running on CPU 0 and do execve syscall and after sched_exec,
> >> dest_cpu is 0, fpsimd_state.cpu is 0. If at the time Process A get scheduled
> >> out and after some kernel threads running on CPU 0, process A is back in CPU 0,
> >> A's fpsimd_state.cpu is current cpu id "0", and per_cpu(fpsimd_last_state)
> >> points A's fpsimd_state, TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE will be clear, kernel will not
> >> reload the context during it return to userspace. so set the cpu's
> >> fpsimd_last_state to NULL to avoid this.
> >
> > AFAICT, this is only a problem if one of the kernel threads uses the fpsimd
> > registers, right? However, kernel_neon_begin_partial clobbers
> > fpsimd_last_state, so I'm struggling to see the problem.
> >
> 
> I think the problem is real, but it would be better to set the
> fpsimd_state::cpu field to an invalid value like we do in
> fpsimd_flush_task_state()
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> index 44d6f7545505..c56956a16d3f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> @@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ void fpsimd_thread_switch(struct task_struct *next)
>  void fpsimd_flush_thread(void)
>  {
>         memset(&current->thread.fpsimd_state, 0, sizeof(struct fpsimd_state));
> +       fpsimd_flush_task_state(current);
>         set_thread_flag(TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE);
>  }
> 
> (note the memset erroneously initializes that field to CPU 0)

Aha, I see. So the problem is actually that we get a view on our fpsimd
state before the exec, rather than a view on some kernel state.

> This more accurately reflects the state of the process after forking,
> i.e., that its FPSIMD state has never been loaded into any CPU.

Yup, that's much clearer.

Will

Re: [PATCH] arm64: fix bug for reloading FPSIMD state after execve on cpu 0.

[Will Deacon]

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 12:32:03PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 26 August 2015 at 13:12, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 03:40:41AM +0100, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
> >> From: Janet Liu <janet.liu@spreadtrum.com>
> >>
> >> If process A is running on CPU 0 and do execve syscall and after sched_exec,
> >> dest_cpu is 0, fpsimd_state.cpu is 0. If at the time Process A get scheduled
> >> out and after some kernel threads running on CPU 0, process A is back in CPU 0,
> >> A's fpsimd_state.cpu is current cpu id "0", and per_cpu(fpsimd_last_state)
> >> points A's fpsimd_state, TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE will be clear, kernel will not
> >> reload the context during it return to userspace. so set the cpu's
> >> fpsimd_last_state to NULL to avoid this.
> >
> > AFAICT, this is only a problem if one of the kernel threads uses the fpsimd
> > registers, right? However, kernel_neon_begin_partial clobbers
> > fpsimd_last_state, so I'm struggling to see the problem.
> >
> 
> I think the problem is real, but it would be better to set the
> fpsimd_state::cpu field to an invalid value like we do in
> fpsimd_flush_task_state()
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> index 44d6f7545505..c56956a16d3f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> @@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ void fpsimd_thread_switch(struct task_struct *next)
>  void fpsimd_flush_thread(void)
>  {
>         memset(&current->thread.fpsimd_state, 0, sizeof(struct fpsimd_state));
> +       fpsimd_flush_task_state(current);
>         set_thread_flag(TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE);
>  }
> 
> (note the memset erroneously initializes that field to CPU 0)

Aha, I see. So the problem is actually that we get a view on our fpsimd
state before the exec, rather than a view on some kernel state.

> This more accurately reflects the state of the process after forking,
> i.e., that its FPSIMD state has never been loaded into any CPU.

Yup, that's much clearer.

Will

[PATCH] arm64: fix bug for reloading FPSIMD state after execve on cpu 0.

[Jianhua Liu]

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Ard Biesheuvel
<ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 26 August 2015 at 13:12, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> [adding Ard]
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 03:40:41AM +0100, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
>>> From: Janet Liu <janet.liu@spreadtrum.com>
>>>
>>> If process A is running on CPU 0 and do execve syscall and after sched_exec,
>>> dest_cpu is 0, fpsimd_state.cpu is 0. If at the time Process A get scheduled
>>> out and after some kernel threads running on CPU 0, process A is back in CPU 0,
>>> A's fpsimd_state.cpu is current cpu id "0", and per_cpu(fpsimd_last_state)
>>> points A's fpsimd_state, TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE will be clear, kernel will not
>>> reload the context during it return to userspace. so set the cpu's
>>> fpsimd_last_state to NULL to avoid this.
>>
>> AFAICT, this is only a problem if one of the kernel threads uses the fpsimd
>> registers, right? However, kernel_neon_begin_partial clobbers
>> fpsimd_last_state, so I'm struggling to see the problem.
>>
>
> I think the problem is real, but it would be better to set the
> fpsimd_state::cpu field to an invalid value like we do in
> fpsimd_flush_task_state()
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> index 44d6f7545505..c56956a16d3f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> @@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ void fpsimd_thread_switch(struct task_struct *next)
>  void fpsimd_flush_thread(void)
>  {
>         memset(&current->thread.fpsimd_state, 0, sizeof(struct fpsimd_state));
> +       fpsimd_flush_task_state(current);
>         set_thread_flag(TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE);
>  }
>
> (note the memset erroneously initializes that field to CPU 0)
>
> This more accurately reflects the state of the process after forking,
> i.e., that its FPSIMD state has never been loaded into any CPU.

I agree with you.
Can you send a patch to maintainer as soon as possible to solve this issue?


Janet
>
> --
> Ard.
>
>> Are you seeing an issue in practice?
>>
>> Will
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Janet Liu <janet.liu@spreadtrum.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@spreadtrum.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c |    1 +
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
>>> index 44d6f75..ec58d94 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
>>> @@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ void fpsimd_flush_thread(void)
>>>  {
>>>       memset(&current->thread.fpsimd_state, 0, sizeof(struct fpsimd_state));
>>>       set_thread_flag(TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE);
>>> +     this_cpu_write(fpsimd_last_state, NULL);
>>>  }
>>>
>>>  /*
>>> --
>>> 1.7.9.5
>>>

Re: [PATCH] arm64: fix bug for reloading FPSIMD state after execve on cpu 0.

[Jianhua Liu]

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Ard Biesheuvel
<ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 26 August 2015 at 13:12, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> [adding Ard]
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 03:40:41AM +0100, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
>>> From: Janet Liu <janet.liu@spreadtrum.com>
>>>
>>> If process A is running on CPU 0 and do execve syscall and after sched_exec,
>>> dest_cpu is 0, fpsimd_state.cpu is 0. If at the time Process A get scheduled
>>> out and after some kernel threads running on CPU 0, process A is back in CPU 0,
>>> A's fpsimd_state.cpu is current cpu id "0", and per_cpu(fpsimd_last_state)
>>> points A's fpsimd_state, TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE will be clear, kernel will not
>>> reload the context during it return to userspace. so set the cpu's
>>> fpsimd_last_state to NULL to avoid this.
>>
>> AFAICT, this is only a problem if one of the kernel threads uses the fpsimd
>> registers, right? However, kernel_neon_begin_partial clobbers
>> fpsimd_last_state, so I'm struggling to see the problem.
>>
>
> I think the problem is real, but it would be better to set the
> fpsimd_state::cpu field to an invalid value like we do in
> fpsimd_flush_task_state()
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> index 44d6f7545505..c56956a16d3f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> @@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ void fpsimd_thread_switch(struct task_struct *next)
>  void fpsimd_flush_thread(void)
>  {
>         memset(&current->thread.fpsimd_state, 0, sizeof(struct fpsimd_state));
> +       fpsimd_flush_task_state(current);
>         set_thread_flag(TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE);
>  }
>
> (note the memset erroneously initializes that field to CPU 0)
>
> This more accurately reflects the state of the process after forking,
> i.e., that its FPSIMD state has never been loaded into any CPU.

I agree with you.
Can you send a patch to maintainer as soon as possible to solve this issue?


Janet
>
> --
> Ard.
>
>> Are you seeing an issue in practice?
>>
>> Will
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Janet Liu <janet.liu@spreadtrum.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@spreadtrum.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c |    1 +
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
>>> index 44d6f75..ec58d94 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
>>> @@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ void fpsimd_flush_thread(void)
>>>  {
>>>       memset(&current->thread.fpsimd_state, 0, sizeof(struct fpsimd_state));
>>>       set_thread_flag(TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE);
>>> +     this_cpu_write(fpsimd_last_state, NULL);
>>>  }
>>>
>>>  /*
>>> --
>>> 1.7.9.5
>>>

[PATCH] arm64: fix bug for reloading FPSIMD state after execve on cpu 0.

[Jianhua Liu]

NO, kernel thread will not use fpsimd.
kernel threads get scheduled in, per_cpu(fpsimd_last_state) will not be updated.

The following is the condion that bug comes.
1. Process A runa on CPU 0, and does execve syscall.
2. Before execve syscall return to userspace, A gets scheduled out.
3. some kernel threads get scheduled in on CPU 0,
    per_cpu(fpsimd_last_state) will not be updated, still points to
A's fpsimd_state
4. Process A get scheduled in on CPU 0,
        1)process A's fpsimd_state.cpu contains 0,
        2)cpu 0's  fpsimd_last_state per-cpu variable points to
process A 's fpsimd_state,
        These two are the conditions that TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE get cleared?

The kernel will not reload the fpsimd context during A returns back to
user space.
But A's fpsimd context is cleared to zero after execve syscall and
must to be reload.


I am not seeing an exact issue in practice.

Janet


On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> [adding Ard]
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 03:40:41AM +0100, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
>> From: Janet Liu <janet.liu@spreadtrum.com>
>>
>> If process A is running on CPU 0 and do execve syscall and after sched_exec,
>> dest_cpu is 0, fpsimd_state.cpu is 0. If at the time Process A get scheduled
>> out and after some kernel threads running on CPU 0, process A is back in CPU 0,
>> A's fpsimd_state.cpu is current cpu id "0", and per_cpu(fpsimd_last_state)
>> points A's fpsimd_state, TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE will be clear, kernel will not
>> reload the context during it return to userspace. so set the cpu's
>> fpsimd_last_state to NULL to avoid this.
>
> AFAICT, this is only a problem if one of the kernel threads uses the fpsimd
> registers, right? However, kernel_neon_begin_partial clobbers
> fpsimd_last_state, so I'm struggling to see the problem.
>
> Are you seeing an issue in practice?
>
> Will
>
>> Signed-off-by: Janet Liu <janet.liu@spreadtrum.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@spreadtrum.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c |    1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
>> index 44d6f75..ec58d94 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
>> @@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ void fpsimd_flush_thread(void)
>>  {
>>       memset(&current->thread.fpsimd_state, 0, sizeof(struct fpsimd_state));
>>       set_thread_flag(TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE);
>> +     this_cpu_write(fpsimd_last_state, NULL);
>>  }
>>
>>  /*
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>>

Re: [PATCH] arm64: fix bug for reloading FPSIMD state after execve on cpu 0.

[Jianhua Liu]

NO, kernel thread will not use fpsimd.
kernel threads get scheduled in, per_cpu(fpsimd_last_state) will not be updated.

The following is the condion that bug comes.
1. Process A runa on CPU 0, and does execve syscall.
2. Before execve syscall return to userspace, A gets scheduled out.
3. some kernel threads get scheduled in on CPU 0,
    per_cpu(fpsimd_last_state) will not be updated, still points to
A's fpsimd_state
4. Process A get scheduled in on CPU 0,
        1)process A's fpsimd_state.cpu contains 0,
        2)cpu 0's  fpsimd_last_state per-cpu variable points to
process A 's fpsimd_state,
        These two are the conditions that TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE get cleared。

The kernel will not reload the fpsimd context during A returns back to
user space.
But A's fpsimd context is cleared to zero after execve syscall and
must to be reload.


I am not seeing an exact issue in practice.

Janet


On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> [adding Ard]
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 03:40:41AM +0100, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
>> From: Janet Liu <janet.liu@spreadtrum.com>
>>
>> If process A is running on CPU 0 and do execve syscall and after sched_exec,
>> dest_cpu is 0, fpsimd_state.cpu is 0. If at the time Process A get scheduled
>> out and after some kernel threads running on CPU 0, process A is back in CPU 0,
>> A's fpsimd_state.cpu is current cpu id "0", and per_cpu(fpsimd_last_state)
>> points A's fpsimd_state, TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE will be clear, kernel will not
>> reload the context during it return to userspace. so set the cpu's
>> fpsimd_last_state to NULL to avoid this.
>
> AFAICT, this is only a problem if one of the kernel threads uses the fpsimd
> registers, right? However, kernel_neon_begin_partial clobbers
> fpsimd_last_state, so I'm struggling to see the problem.
>
> Are you seeing an issue in practice?
>
> Will
>
>> Signed-off-by: Janet Liu <janet.liu@spreadtrum.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@spreadtrum.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c |    1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
>> index 44d6f75..ec58d94 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
>> @@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ void fpsimd_flush_thread(void)
>>  {
>>       memset(&current->thread.fpsimd_state, 0, sizeof(struct fpsimd_state));
>>       set_thread_flag(TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE);
>> +     this_cpu_write(fpsimd_last_state, NULL);
>>  }
>>
>>  /*
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>>