From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"pi-cheng.chen" <pi-cheng.chen@linaro.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (new arm, arm64, s390 failures)
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 16:31:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150831163103.2e13b301@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150831141736.GA19616@roeck-us.net>
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 07:17:36 -0700
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
Hi Guenter,
> Qemu test results:
> total: 85 pass: 74 fail: 11
> Failed tests:
> arm:vexpress-a9:arm_vexpress_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9
> arm:vexpress-a15:arm_vexpress_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1
> arm:vexpress-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9
> arm:vexpress-a15:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1
> arm:realview-pb-a8:arm_realview_pb_defconfig
> arm:realview-eb:arm_realview_eb_defconfig
> mips:fuloong2e_defconfig
> xtensa:dc232b:lx60:xtensa_defconfig
> xtensa:dc232b:kc705:xtensa_defconfig
> xtensa:dc233c:ml605:generic_kc705_defconfig
> xtensa:dc233c:kc705:generic_kc705_defconfi
>
> Notable new failures (since next-20150828) are the s390 build failures,
> the arm64 build failure, and the arm qemu test failures.
>
[...]
> The qemu arm tests all fail silently, meaning there is no console
> output. Bisect points to 'irqchip/GIC: Convert to EOImode == 1'.
> Bisect log attached.
Could you give me a qemu command-line I can use to track this down?
Real HW seems happy enough, from what I can see...
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
<linux-next@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"pi-cheng.chen" <pi-cheng.chen@linaro.org>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@plumgrid.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (new arm, arm64, s390 failures)
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 16:31:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150831163103.2e13b301@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150831141736.GA19616@roeck-us.net>
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 07:17:36 -0700
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
Hi Guenter,
> Qemu test results:
> total: 85 pass: 74 fail: 11
> Failed tests:
> arm:vexpress-a9:arm_vexpress_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9
> arm:vexpress-a15:arm_vexpress_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1
> arm:vexpress-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9
> arm:vexpress-a15:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1
> arm:realview-pb-a8:arm_realview_pb_defconfig
> arm:realview-eb:arm_realview_eb_defconfig
> mips:fuloong2e_defconfig
> xtensa:dc232b:lx60:xtensa_defconfig
> xtensa:dc232b:kc705:xtensa_defconfig
> xtensa:dc233c:ml605:generic_kc705_defconfig
> xtensa:dc233c:kc705:generic_kc705_defconfi
>
> Notable new failures (since next-20150828) are the s390 build failures,
> the arm64 build failure, and the arm qemu test failures.
>
[...]
> The qemu arm tests all fail silently, meaning there is no console
> output. Bisect points to 'irqchip/GIC: Convert to EOImode == 1'.
> Bisect log attached.
Could you give me a qemu command-line I can use to track this down?
Real HW seems happy enough, from what I can see...
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-31 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-31 9:54 linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 Stephen Rothwell
2015-08-31 14:17 ` linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (new arm, arm64, s390 failures) Guenter Roeck
2015-08-31 15:09 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-08-31 15:31 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2015-08-31 15:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-31 15:47 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-08-31 16:18 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-31 16:18 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-31 16:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-08-31 17:09 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-31 17:09 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-31 18:26 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-31 18:26 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-31 18:57 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-08-31 19:13 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-31 19:13 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-31 19:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-08-31 20:07 ` Mark Brown
2015-08-31 18:33 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150831163103.2e13b301@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=pi-cheng.chen@linaro.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.