From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
"grant.likely@linaro.org" <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, "agraf@suse.de" <agraf@suse.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] PCI: pci-host-generic: Fix lookup of linux,pci-probe-only property
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 10:15:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150907091537.GA14244@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441385411-7624-3-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 05:50:09PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> When pci-host-generic looks for the probe-only property, it seems
> to trust the DT to be correctly written, and assumes that there
> is a parameter to the property.
>
> Unfortunately, this is not always the case, and some firmware expose
> this property naked. The driver ends up making a decision based on
> whatever the property pointer points to, which is likely to be junk.
>
> Switch to the common of_pci.c implementation that doesn't suffer
> from this problem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.c | 9 +--------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.c
> index 265dd25..224303d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.c
> @@ -210,7 +210,6 @@ static int gen_pci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> int err;
> const char *type;
> const struct of_device_id *of_id;
> - const int *prop;
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> struct gen_pci *pci = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pci), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -225,13 +224,7 @@ static int gen_pci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - prop = of_get_property(of_chosen, "linux,pci-probe-only", NULL);
> - if (prop) {
> - if (*prop)
> - pci_add_flags(PCI_PROBE_ONLY);
> - else
> - pci_clear_flags(PCI_PROBE_ONLY);
> - }
> + of_pci_check_probe_only();
Looks good to me:
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Thanks, Marc.
Will
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/4] PCI: pci-host-generic: Fix lookup of linux,pci-probe-only property
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 10:15:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150907091537.GA14244@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441385411-7624-3-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 05:50:09PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> When pci-host-generic looks for the probe-only property, it seems
> to trust the DT to be correctly written, and assumes that there
> is a parameter to the property.
>
> Unfortunately, this is not always the case, and some firmware expose
> this property naked. The driver ends up making a decision based on
> whatever the property pointer points to, which is likely to be junk.
>
> Switch to the common of_pci.c implementation that doesn't suffer
> from this problem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.c | 9 +--------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.c
> index 265dd25..224303d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.c
> @@ -210,7 +210,6 @@ static int gen_pci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> int err;
> const char *type;
> const struct of_device_id *of_id;
> - const int *prop;
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> struct gen_pci *pci = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pci), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -225,13 +224,7 @@ static int gen_pci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - prop = of_get_property(of_chosen, "linux,pci-probe-only", NULL);
> - if (prop) {
> - if (*prop)
> - pci_add_flags(PCI_PROBE_ONLY);
> - else
> - pci_clear_flags(PCI_PROBE_ONLY);
> - }
> + of_pci_check_probe_only();
Looks good to me:
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Thanks, Marc.
Will
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
<benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe-Gsx/Oe8HsFggBc27wqDAHg@public.gmane.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
"suravee.suthikulpanit-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org"
<suravee.suthikulpanit-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi
<Lorenzo.Pieralisi-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
"grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org"
<grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
"agraf-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org"
<agraf-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
"linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org"
<linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] PCI: pci-host-generic: Fix lookup of linux,pci-probe-only property
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 10:15:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150907091537.GA14244@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441385411-7624-3-git-send-email-marc.zyngier-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 05:50:09PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> When pci-host-generic looks for the probe-only property, it seems
> to trust the DT to be correctly written, and assumes that there
> is a parameter to the property.
>
> Unfortunately, this is not always the case, and some firmware expose
> this property naked. The driver ends up making a decision based on
> whatever the property pointer points to, which is likely to be junk.
>
> Switch to the common of_pci.c implementation that doesn't suffer
> from this problem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.c | 9 +--------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.c
> index 265dd25..224303d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.c
> @@ -210,7 +210,6 @@ static int gen_pci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> int err;
> const char *type;
> const struct of_device_id *of_id;
> - const int *prop;
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> struct gen_pci *pci = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pci), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -225,13 +224,7 @@ static int gen_pci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - prop = of_get_property(of_chosen, "linux,pci-probe-only", NULL);
> - if (prop) {
> - if (*prop)
> - pci_add_flags(PCI_PROBE_ONLY);
> - else
> - pci_clear_flags(PCI_PROBE_ONLY);
> - }
> + of_pci_check_probe_only();
Looks good to me:
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
Thanks, Marc.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-07 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-04 16:50 [PATCH v4 0/4] PCI: arm64/powerpc: Fix parsing of linux,pci-probe-only Marc Zyngier
2015-09-04 16:50 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] PCI: arm64/powerpc: Fix parsing of linux, pci-probe-only Marc Zyngier
2015-09-04 16:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-04 16:50 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] of/pci: Add of_pci_check_probe_only to parse "linux,pci-probe-only" Marc Zyngier
2015-09-04 16:50 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] of/pci: Add of_pci_check_probe_only to parse "linux, pci-probe-only" Marc Zyngier
2015-09-04 16:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-04 16:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-04 19:19 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] of/pci: Add of_pci_check_probe_only to parse "linux,pci-probe-only" Rob Herring
2015-09-04 19:19 ` Rob Herring
2015-09-04 19:19 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] of/pci: Add of_pci_check_probe_only to parse "linux, pci-probe-only" Rob Herring
2015-09-04 19:19 ` Rob Herring
2015-09-04 16:50 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] PCI: pci-host-generic: Fix lookup of linux,pci-probe-only property Marc Zyngier
2015-09-04 16:50 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] PCI: pci-host-generic: Fix lookup of linux, pci-probe-only property Marc Zyngier
2015-09-04 16:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-07 9:15 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2015-09-07 9:15 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] PCI: pci-host-generic: Fix lookup of linux,pci-probe-only property Will Deacon
2015-09-07 9:15 ` Will Deacon
2015-09-04 16:50 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] powerpc: PCI: " Marc Zyngier
2015-09-04 16:50 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] powerpc: PCI: Fix lookup of linux, pci-probe-only property Marc Zyngier
2015-09-04 16:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-07 8:59 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] powerpc: PCI: Fix lookup of linux,pci-probe-only property Michael Ellerman
2015-09-07 8:59 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-09-04 16:50 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] arm64: dts: Drop linux,pci-probe-only from the Seattle DTS Marc Zyngier
2015-09-04 16:50 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] arm64: dts: Drop linux, pci-probe-only " Marc Zyngier
2015-09-04 16:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-04 18:52 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] PCI: arm64/powerpc: Fix parsing of linux,pci-probe-only Rob Herring
2015-09-04 18:52 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] PCI: arm64/powerpc: Fix parsing of linux, pci-probe-only Rob Herring
2015-09-04 18:52 ` Rob Herring
2015-09-17 15:30 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] PCI: arm64/powerpc: Fix parsing of linux,pci-probe-only Bjorn Helgaas
2015-09-17 15:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-09-17 17:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-17 17:17 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] PCI: arm64/powerpc: Fix parsing of linux, pci-probe-only Marc Zyngier
2015-09-17 17:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-17 17:21 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] PCI: arm64/powerpc: Fix parsing of linux,pci-probe-only Bjorn Helgaas
2015-09-17 17:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-09-17 17:21 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] PCI: arm64/powerpc: Fix parsing of linux, pci-probe-only Bjorn Helgaas
2015-09-17 17:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150907091537.GA14244@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.