From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Chen Gang <xili_gchen_5257@hotmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com"
<kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
"riel@redhat.com" <riel@redhat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
"sasha.levin@oracle.com" <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
"pfeiner@google.com" <pfeiner@google.com>,
"aarcange@redhat.com" <aarcange@redhat.com>,
"vishnu.ps@samsung.com" <vishnu.ps@samsung.com>,
Linux Memory <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/mmap.c: Remove redundent 'get_area' function pointer in get_unmapped_area()
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 14:41:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150907124148.GB32668@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <COL130-W16C972B0457D5C7C9CB06B9560@phx.gbl>
On 09/05, Chen Gang wrote:
>
> From a1bf4726f71d6d0394b41309944646fc806a8a0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2015 21:51:08 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] mm/mmap.c: Remove redundent 'get_area' function pointer in
> get_unmapped_area()
>
> Call the function pointer directly, then let code a bit simpler.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This is subjective you know ;)
I guess the author of this code added this variable to make the code
more readable. And to me it becomes less readable after your change.
I leave this to you and maintainers.
> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
> ---
> mm/mmap.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> index 4db7cf0..39fd727 100644
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -2012,10 +2012,8 @@ unsigned long
> get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
> unsigned long pgoff, unsigned long flags)
> {
> - unsigned long (*get_area)(struct file *, unsigned long,
> - unsigned long, unsigned long, unsigned long);
> -
> unsigned long error = arch_mmap_check(addr, len, flags);
> +
> if (error)
> return error;
>
> @@ -2023,10 +2021,12 @@ get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
> if (len> TASK_SIZE)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - get_area = current->mm->get_unmapped_area;
> if (file && file->f_op->get_unmapped_area)
> - get_area = file->f_op->get_unmapped_area;
> - addr = get_area(file, addr, len, pgoff, flags);
> + addr = file->f_op->get_unmapped_area(file, addr, len,
> + pgoff, flags);
> + else
> + addr = current->mm->get_unmapped_area(file, addr, len,
> + pgoff, flags);
> if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr))
> return addr;
>
> --
> 1.9.3
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Chen Gang <xili_gchen_5257@hotmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com"
<kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
"riel@redhat.com" <riel@redhat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
"sasha.levin@oracle.com" <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
"pfeiner@google.com" <pfeiner@google.com>,
"aarcange@redhat.com" <aarcange@redhat.com>,
"vishnu.ps@samsung.com" <vishnu.ps@samsung.com>,
Linux Memory <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/mmap.c: Remove redundent 'get_area' function pointer in get_unmapped_area()
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 14:41:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150907124148.GB32668@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <COL130-W16C972B0457D5C7C9CB06B9560@phx.gbl>
On 09/05, Chen Gang wrote:
>
> From a1bf4726f71d6d0394b41309944646fc806a8a0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2015 21:51:08 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] mm/mmap.c: Remove redundent 'get_area' function pointer in
> get_unmapped_area()
>
> Call the function pointer directly, then let code a bit simpler.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This is subjective you know ;)
I guess the author of this code added this variable to make the code
more readable. And to me it becomes less readable after your change.
I leave this to you and maintainers.
> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
> ---
> mm/mmap.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> index 4db7cf0..39fd727 100644
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -2012,10 +2012,8 @@ unsigned long
> get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
> unsigned long pgoff, unsigned long flags)
> {
> - unsigned long (*get_area)(struct file *, unsigned long,
> - unsigned long, unsigned long, unsigned long);
> -
> unsigned long error = arch_mmap_check(addr, len, flags);
> +
> if (error)
> return error;
>
> @@ -2023,10 +2021,12 @@ get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
> if (len> TASK_SIZE)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - get_area = current->mm->get_unmapped_area;
> if (file && file->f_op->get_unmapped_area)
> - get_area = file->f_op->get_unmapped_area;
> - addr = get_area(file, addr, len, pgoff, flags);
> + addr = file->f_op->get_unmapped_area(file, addr, len,
> + pgoff, flags);
> + else
> + addr = current->mm->get_unmapped_area(file, addr, len,
> + pgoff, flags);
> if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr))
> return addr;
>
> --
> 1.9.3
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-07 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-05 14:09 [PATCH] mm/mmap.c: Remove redundent 'get_area' function pointer in get_unmapped_area() Chen Gang
2015-09-05 14:09 ` Chen Gang
2015-09-07 12:41 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2015-09-07 12:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
[not found] ` <55EEEC18.10101@hotmail.com>
2015-09-08 14:09 ` Chen Gang
2015-09-08 14:09 ` Chen Gang
2015-09-08 23:23 ` David Rientjes
2015-09-08 23:23 ` David Rientjes
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-09-03 4:14 gang.chen.5i5j
2015-09-10 22:32 ` Andrew Morton
2015-09-10 22:32 ` Andrew Morton
2015-09-11 23:52 ` Chen Gang
2015-09-11 23:52 ` Chen Gang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150907124148.GB32668@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=pfeiner@google.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
--cc=vishnu.ps@samsung.com \
--cc=xili_gchen_5257@hotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.