All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: fix bug which lowmem size is limited to 760MB
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 01:10:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150908001042.GT21084@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1509071152510.22877@knanqh.ubzr>

On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 03:40:36PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Sep 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 
> > On Thursday 03 September 2015 21:24:00 Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > If 768MB targets were common place then it could be worth changing the 
> > > default vmalloc size to accommodate this memory size and testing all the 
> > > other targets to make sure no regressions are introduced.  But given it 
> > > is easy to change the default via the kernel cmdline, and that you lose 
> > > only 8 MB otherwise, I don't think it is worth the trouble and/or the 
> > > risk.
> > 
> > Agreed.
> 
> Well... I think there is a better solution.

Doesn't this clash with things like:

#define UNCACHEABLE_ADDR        0xff000000      /* IRQ_STAT */

?

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Yongtaek Lee <ytk.lee@samsung.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: fix bug which lowmem size is limited to 760MB
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 01:10:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150908001042.GT21084@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1509071152510.22877@knanqh.ubzr>

On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 03:40:36PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Sep 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 
> > On Thursday 03 September 2015 21:24:00 Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > If 768MB targets were common place then it could be worth changing the 
> > > default vmalloc size to accommodate this memory size and testing all the 
> > > other targets to make sure no regressions are introduced.  But given it 
> > > is easy to change the default via the kernel cmdline, and that you lose 
> > > only 8 MB otherwise, I don't think it is worth the trouble and/or the 
> > > risk.
> > 
> > Agreed.
> 
> Well... I think there is a better solution.

Doesn't this clash with things like:

#define UNCACHEABLE_ADDR        0xff000000      /* IRQ_STAT */

?

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-08  0:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-03  2:24 [PATCH] ARM: fix bug which VMALLOC_START is lowwer than 0xf0000000 Yongtaek Lee
2015-09-03  2:24 ` Yongtaek Lee
2015-09-03  5:11 ` [PATCH] ARM: fix bug which lowmem size is limited to 760MB Yongtaek Lee
2015-09-03  5:11   ` Yongtaek Lee
2015-09-03  8:00 ` [PATCH] ARM: fix bug which VMALLOC_START is lowwer than 0xf0000000 Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-09-03  8:00   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-09-03  8:28   ` Yongtaek Lee
2015-09-03  8:28     ` Yongtaek Lee
2015-09-03  8:34     ` Lucas Stach
2015-09-03  8:34       ` Lucas Stach
2015-09-03  8:43       ` Yongtaek Lee
2015-09-03  8:43         ` Re: " Yongtaek Lee
2015-09-03  9:10         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-09-03  9:10           ` Re: " Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-09-03 10:30           ` [PATCH] ARM: fix bug which lowmem size is limited to 760MB Yongtaek Lee
2015-09-03 10:30             ` Yongtaek Lee
2015-09-04  1:24             ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-09-04  1:24               ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-09-07 11:41               ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-09-07 11:41                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-09-07 15:34                 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-09-07 15:34                   ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-09-07 15:45                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-09-07 15:45                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-09-07 15:49                     ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-09-07 15:49                       ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-09-07 19:40                 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-09-07 19:40                   ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-09-08  0:10                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2015-09-08  0:10                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-09-08  2:01                     ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-09-08  2:01                       ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-09-08  8:03                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-09-08  8:03                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-09-08 14:58                         ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-09-08 14:58                           ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-09-03  9:07       ` [PATCH] ARM: fix bug which VMALLOC_START is lowwer than 0xf0000000 Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-09-03  9:07         ` Russell King - ARM Linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150908001042.GT21084@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.