From: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
To: "Andreas Müller" <schnitzeltony@googlemail.com>
Cc: "openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org"
<openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>,
Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [OE-core] State of bitbake world, wrong PACKAGE_ARCHs 2015-09-08
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 19:03:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150909170311.GB2390@jama> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALbNGRQ9px7rNf_uYdyynHcDAHHDr-vBbh0y8SAObnMcARbORA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4400 bytes --]
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 05:14:59PM +0200, Andreas Müller wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 09:14:20AM +0200, Andreas Müller wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 11:39:20PM +0200, Andreas Müller wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> > ERROR: polkit-group-rule-datetime different signature for task do_configure.sigdata between qemux86copy and qemuarm
> >> >> > runtaskdeps changed from ['polkitpolkit-group-rule-datetime.bb.do_patch', 'polkitpolkit_0.113.bb.do_populate_sysroot', 'shadowshadow_4.2.1.bb.do_populate_sysroot:virtual:native'] to ['polkitpolkit-group-rule-datetime.bb.do_patch', 'polkitpolkit_0.113.bb.do_populate_sysroot', 'shadowshadow_4.2.1.bb.do_populate_sysroot:virtual:native']
> >> >> > /home/jenkins/oe/world/shr-core/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-extended/polkit/polkit_0.113.bb.do_populate_sysroot with hash 284d6bbd28ea723c466e0c5c88a09a50
> >> >> I missed many of these - because I am not up to date on oe-core (did
> >> >> not want to loose midori for my images) - will change that soon. For
> >> >> this type of error: is it correct that it is caused by allarch recipes
> >> >> depending on machine/architecture specific recipes?
> >> >
> >> > close, the important part is few lines bellow:
> >> >
> >> > /home/jenkins/oe/world/shr-core/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-extended/polkit/polkit_0.113.bb.do_populate_sysroot
> >> > with hash
> >> > 284d6bbd28ea723c466e0c5c88a09a50
> >> > changed to
> >> > /home/jenkins/oe/world/shr-core/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-extended/polkit/polkit_0.113.bb.do_populate_sysroot
> >> > with hash
> >> > 06cf7139c6588d047fa11444d88175ab
> >> > Hash for dependent task polkitpolkit_0.113.bb.do_populate_sysroot
> >> > changed from 284d6bbd28ea723c466e0c5c88a09a50 to
> >> > 06cf7139c6588d047fa11444d88175ab
> >> >
> >> > so allarch recipe polkitpolkit-group-rule-datetime is depending on
> >> > TUNE_PKGARCH-specific recipe polkit (on it's do_populate_sysroot task
> >> > which is expected to be different for diferent TUNE_PKGARCHs)
> >> >
> >> So to fix we could
> >>
> >> 1. either remove dependencies or
> >> 2. remove allarch or
> >> 3. ??
> >
> > 3a) add such dependency to SIGGEN_EXCLUDERECIPES_ABISAFE if it's
> > completely ABI safe (recipes depending on it shouldn't get rebuild after
> > any changes to it)
> > 3b) add such dependency to SIGGEN_EXCLUDE_SAFE_RECIPE_DEPS to exclude it
> > only for given recipe (in this case by saying that polkit-groups doesn't
> > need rebuild when polkit recipe is changed in any way)
> >
> >> For e.g the polkit-groups 1 seems not possible what about package
> >> feeds when removing allarch?
> >
> > I think in this case 3a) and 3b) don't apply as well, so easiest and
> > safest option is 2), package feeds should survive that, because new
> > package will have higher version (when PRserv is used) and also higher
> > package arch priority (all is lowest). Even the sysroot should now
> > survive ok, with new functionality which "uninstalls" staged file for
> > unreachable stamps.
> >
> > Also polkit-groups build doesn't take very long, so we don't mind to
> > build it once per TUNE_PKGARCH instead of building it as allarch only
> > once but with unsafe deps.
> >
> Thanks a lot and I agree with removing allarch for this case. Hope I
> have the courage to update oe-core this weekend :)
>
> Ah - one further question for tests: The allarch signature change is
> detected only when building multiple machines - correct?
Yes, to detect the most obvious issues I'm using qemux86 and qemux86copy
MACHINEs (qemux86copy is added in one of oe-core/jansa/master patches).
This is good for detecting TUNE_PKGARCH depending on MACHINE_ARCH.
But to detect allarch depending on TUNE_PKGARCH recipe you need to
compare it between 2 MACHINEs with different TUNE_PKGARCH (I'm using
qemux86 and qemuarm).
Most of this testing logic is defined in:
openembedded-core/scripts/sstate-diff-machines.sh
if you pass --analyze parameter, that's what jenkins jobs are using to
generate this report.
Regards,
>
> Andreas
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
To: "Andreas Müller" <schnitzeltony@googlemail.com>
Cc: "openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org"
<openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>,
Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: State of bitbake world, wrong PACKAGE_ARCHs 2015-09-08
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 19:03:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150909170311.GB2390@jama> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALbNGRQ9px7rNf_uYdyynHcDAHHDr-vBbh0y8SAObnMcARbORA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4400 bytes --]
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 05:14:59PM +0200, Andreas Müller wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 09:14:20AM +0200, Andreas Müller wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 11:39:20PM +0200, Andreas Müller wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> > ERROR: polkit-group-rule-datetime different signature for task do_configure.sigdata between qemux86copy and qemuarm
> >> >> > runtaskdeps changed from ['polkitpolkit-group-rule-datetime.bb.do_patch', 'polkitpolkit_0.113.bb.do_populate_sysroot', 'shadowshadow_4.2.1.bb.do_populate_sysroot:virtual:native'] to ['polkitpolkit-group-rule-datetime.bb.do_patch', 'polkitpolkit_0.113.bb.do_populate_sysroot', 'shadowshadow_4.2.1.bb.do_populate_sysroot:virtual:native']
> >> >> > /home/jenkins/oe/world/shr-core/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-extended/polkit/polkit_0.113.bb.do_populate_sysroot with hash 284d6bbd28ea723c466e0c5c88a09a50
> >> >> I missed many of these - because I am not up to date on oe-core (did
> >> >> not want to loose midori for my images) - will change that soon. For
> >> >> this type of error: is it correct that it is caused by allarch recipes
> >> >> depending on machine/architecture specific recipes?
> >> >
> >> > close, the important part is few lines bellow:
> >> >
> >> > /home/jenkins/oe/world/shr-core/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-extended/polkit/polkit_0.113.bb.do_populate_sysroot
> >> > with hash
> >> > 284d6bbd28ea723c466e0c5c88a09a50
> >> > changed to
> >> > /home/jenkins/oe/world/shr-core/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-extended/polkit/polkit_0.113.bb.do_populate_sysroot
> >> > with hash
> >> > 06cf7139c6588d047fa11444d88175ab
> >> > Hash for dependent task polkitpolkit_0.113.bb.do_populate_sysroot
> >> > changed from 284d6bbd28ea723c466e0c5c88a09a50 to
> >> > 06cf7139c6588d047fa11444d88175ab
> >> >
> >> > so allarch recipe polkitpolkit-group-rule-datetime is depending on
> >> > TUNE_PKGARCH-specific recipe polkit (on it's do_populate_sysroot task
> >> > which is expected to be different for diferent TUNE_PKGARCHs)
> >> >
> >> So to fix we could
> >>
> >> 1. either remove dependencies or
> >> 2. remove allarch or
> >> 3. ??
> >
> > 3a) add such dependency to SIGGEN_EXCLUDERECIPES_ABISAFE if it's
> > completely ABI safe (recipes depending on it shouldn't get rebuild after
> > any changes to it)
> > 3b) add such dependency to SIGGEN_EXCLUDE_SAFE_RECIPE_DEPS to exclude it
> > only for given recipe (in this case by saying that polkit-groups doesn't
> > need rebuild when polkit recipe is changed in any way)
> >
> >> For e.g the polkit-groups 1 seems not possible what about package
> >> feeds when removing allarch?
> >
> > I think in this case 3a) and 3b) don't apply as well, so easiest and
> > safest option is 2), package feeds should survive that, because new
> > package will have higher version (when PRserv is used) and also higher
> > package arch priority (all is lowest). Even the sysroot should now
> > survive ok, with new functionality which "uninstalls" staged file for
> > unreachable stamps.
> >
> > Also polkit-groups build doesn't take very long, so we don't mind to
> > build it once per TUNE_PKGARCH instead of building it as allarch only
> > once but with unsafe deps.
> >
> Thanks a lot and I agree with removing allarch for this case. Hope I
> have the courage to update oe-core this weekend :)
>
> Ah - one further question for tests: The allarch signature change is
> detected only when building multiple machines - correct?
Yes, to detect the most obvious issues I'm using qemux86 and qemux86copy
MACHINEs (qemux86copy is added in one of oe-core/jansa/master patches).
This is good for detecting TUNE_PKGARCH depending on MACHINE_ARCH.
But to detect allarch depending on TUNE_PKGARCH recipe you need to
compare it between 2 MACHINEs with different TUNE_PKGARCH (I'm using
qemux86 and qemuarm).
Most of this testing logic is defined in:
openembedded-core/scripts/sstate-diff-machines.sh
if you pass --analyze parameter, that's what jenkins jobs are using to
generate this report.
Regards,
>
> Andreas
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-09 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-08 15:58 State of bitbake world, wrong PACKAGE_ARCHs 2015-09-08 Martin Jansa
2015-09-08 17:09 ` Martin Jansa
2015-09-08 21:39 ` [OE-core] " Andreas Müller
2015-09-08 21:39 ` Andreas Müller
2015-09-08 23:10 ` [OE-core] " Martin Jansa
2015-09-08 23:10 ` Martin Jansa
2015-09-09 7:14 ` [OE-core] " Andreas Müller
2015-09-09 7:14 ` Andreas Müller
2015-09-09 14:55 ` [OE-core] " Martin Jansa
2015-09-09 14:55 ` Martin Jansa
2015-09-09 15:14 ` [OE-core] " Andreas Müller
2015-09-09 15:14 ` Andreas Müller
2015-09-09 17:03 ` Martin Jansa [this message]
2015-09-09 17:03 ` Martin Jansa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150909170311.GB2390@jama \
--to=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=schnitzeltony@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.