From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linuxfoundation.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@virtuozzo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: add architecture primitives for software dirty bit clearing
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 12:30:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150922123001.09449feb@mschwide> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150922090935.GA10131@uranus>
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 12:09:35 +0300
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 09:35:49AM +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > Thanks. I have added both patches to the features branch of linux-s390
> > for the 4.4 merge window.
>
> The first patch (x86 and general helpers) seems better to go via
> Andrew (CC'ed) becase they are not s390 only. And while these
> changes are fine for me and you as far as I can say, lets them
> floating around for some more review just to make sure we're not
> missing something obvious.
>
> And initially the soft-dirty feature has been hittin vanilla by
> -mm tree so I suppose we should continue this way, though I
> don't mind if it gonna be merged via pull request from s390
> side but still ;)
Well, the patches will be included in linux-next automatically and
they will get a fair share of testing before the 4.4 merge window
opens. If the patches get picked up via -mm as well, be my guest.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linuxfoundation.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@virtuozzo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: add architecture primitives for software dirty bit clearing
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 12:30:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150922123001.09449feb@mschwide> (raw)
Message-ID: <20150922103001.dKWi_z5vc5VOV-aiheCrZVDBFgNeDYy5W9OkeTXkuuc@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150922090935.GA10131@uranus>
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 12:09:35 +0300
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 09:35:49AM +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > Thanks. I have added both patches to the features branch of linux-s390
> > for the 4.4 merge window.
>
> The first patch (x86 and general helpers) seems better to go via
> Andrew (CC'ed) becase they are not s390 only. And while these
> changes are fine for me and you as far as I can say, lets them
> floating around for some more review just to make sure we're not
> missing something obvious.
>
> And initially the soft-dirty feature has been hittin vanilla by
> -mm tree so I suppose we should continue this way, though I
> don't mind if it gonna be merged via pull request from s390
> side but still ;)
Well, the patches will be included in linux-next automatically and
they will get a fair share of testing before the 4.4 merge window
opens. If the patches get picked up via -mm as well, be my guest.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-22 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-21 15:22 [PATCH 0/2] mm: soft-dirty bits for s390 Martin Schwidefsky
2015-09-21 15:22 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2015-09-21 15:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: add architecture primitives for software dirty bit clearing Martin Schwidefsky
2015-09-21 15:22 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2015-09-21 19:48 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2015-09-21 19:48 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2015-09-22 7:35 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2015-09-22 7:35 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2015-09-22 9:09 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2015-09-22 9:09 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2015-09-22 10:30 ` Martin Schwidefsky [this message]
2015-09-22 10:30 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2015-09-21 15:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] s390/mm: implement soft-dirty bits for user memory change tracking Martin Schwidefsky
2015-09-21 15:22 ` Martin Schwidefsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150922123001.09449feb@mschwide \
--to=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=xemul@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.