All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
	Andy Gross <agross@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	David Collins <collinsd@codeaurora.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] OPP: Allow notifiers to call dev_pm_opp_get_{voltage,freq} RCU-free
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:10:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150922171031.GH24314@linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1442623929-4507-4-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org>

On 18-09-15, 17:52, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> We pass the dev_pm_opp structure to OPP notifiers but the users
> of the notifier need to surround calls to dev_pm_opp_get_*() with
> RCU read locks to avoid lockdep warnings. The notifier is already
> called with the dev_opp's srcu lock held, so it should be safe to
> assume the devm_pm_opp structure is already protected inside the
> notifier. Update the lockdep check for this.
> 
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/base/power/opp.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp.c b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> index 35b66c46dcb7..1d8c45e53245 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> @@ -146,9 +146,10 @@ static LIST_HEAD(dev_opp_list);
>  /* Lock to allow exclusive modification to the device and opp lists */
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(dev_opp_list_lock);
>  
> -#define opp_rcu_lockdep_assert()					\
> +#define opp_rcu_lockdep_assert(s)					\
>  do {									\
>  	RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_held() &&			\
> +				!(s && srcu_read_lock_held(s)) &&	\
>  				!lockdep_is_held(&dev_opp_list_lock),	\
>  			   "Missing rcu_read_lock() or "		\
>  			   "dev_opp_list_lock protection");		\
> @@ -236,9 +237,10 @@ unsigned long dev_pm_opp_get_voltage(struct dev_pm_opp *opp)
>  	struct dev_pm_opp *tmp_opp;
>  	unsigned long v = 0;
>  
> -	opp_rcu_lockdep_assert();
> +	opp_rcu_lockdep_assert(&opp->dev_opp->srcu_head.srcu);
>  
> -	tmp_opp = rcu_dereference(opp);
> +	tmp_opp = srcu_dereference_check(opp, &opp->dev_opp->srcu_head.srcu,
> +					 rcu_read_lock_held());
>  	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tmp_opp) || !tmp_opp->available)
>  		pr_err("%s: Invalid parameters\n", __func__);
>  	else
> @@ -268,9 +270,10 @@ unsigned long dev_pm_opp_get_freq(struct dev_pm_opp *opp)
>  	struct dev_pm_opp *tmp_opp;
>  	unsigned long f = 0;
>  
> -	opp_rcu_lockdep_assert();
> +	opp_rcu_lockdep_assert(&opp->dev_opp->srcu_head.srcu);
>  
> -	tmp_opp = rcu_dereference(opp);
> +	tmp_opp = srcu_dereference_check(opp, &opp->dev_opp->srcu_head.srcu,
> +					 rcu_read_lock_held());
>  	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tmp_opp) || !tmp_opp->available)
>  		pr_err("%s: Invalid parameters\n", __func__);
>  	else
> @@ -437,7 +440,7 @@ struct dev_pm_opp *dev_pm_opp_find_freq_exact(struct device *dev,
>  	struct device_opp *dev_opp;
>  	struct dev_pm_opp *temp_opp, *opp = ERR_PTR(-ERANGE);
>  
> -	opp_rcu_lockdep_assert();
> +	opp_rcu_lockdep_assert(NULL);
>  
>  	dev_opp = _find_device_opp(dev);
>  	if (IS_ERR(dev_opp)) {
> @@ -485,7 +488,7 @@ struct dev_pm_opp *dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil(struct device *dev,
>  	struct device_opp *dev_opp;
>  	struct dev_pm_opp *temp_opp, *opp = ERR_PTR(-ERANGE);
>  
> -	opp_rcu_lockdep_assert();
> +	opp_rcu_lockdep_assert(NULL);
>  
>  	if (!dev || !freq) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "%s: Invalid argument freq=%p\n", __func__, freq);
> @@ -535,7 +538,7 @@ struct dev_pm_opp *dev_pm_opp_find_freq_floor(struct device *dev,
>  	struct device_opp *dev_opp;
>  	struct dev_pm_opp *temp_opp, *opp = ERR_PTR(-ERANGE);
>  
> -	opp_rcu_lockdep_assert();
> +	opp_rcu_lockdep_assert(NULL);
>  
>  	if (!dev || !freq) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "%s: Invalid argument freq=%p\n", __func__, freq);

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

-- 
viresh

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: viresh.kumar@linaro.org (Viresh Kumar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] OPP: Allow notifiers to call dev_pm_opp_get_{voltage,freq} RCU-free
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:10:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150922171031.GH24314@linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1442623929-4507-4-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org>

On 18-09-15, 17:52, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> We pass the dev_pm_opp structure to OPP notifiers but the users
> of the notifier need to surround calls to dev_pm_opp_get_*() with
> RCU read locks to avoid lockdep warnings. The notifier is already
> called with the dev_opp's srcu lock held, so it should be safe to
> assume the devm_pm_opp structure is already protected inside the
> notifier. Update the lockdep check for this.
> 
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/base/power/opp.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp.c b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> index 35b66c46dcb7..1d8c45e53245 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> @@ -146,9 +146,10 @@ static LIST_HEAD(dev_opp_list);
>  /* Lock to allow exclusive modification to the device and opp lists */
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(dev_opp_list_lock);
>  
> -#define opp_rcu_lockdep_assert()					\
> +#define opp_rcu_lockdep_assert(s)					\
>  do {									\
>  	RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_held() &&			\
> +				!(s && srcu_read_lock_held(s)) &&	\
>  				!lockdep_is_held(&dev_opp_list_lock),	\
>  			   "Missing rcu_read_lock() or "		\
>  			   "dev_opp_list_lock protection");		\
> @@ -236,9 +237,10 @@ unsigned long dev_pm_opp_get_voltage(struct dev_pm_opp *opp)
>  	struct dev_pm_opp *tmp_opp;
>  	unsigned long v = 0;
>  
> -	opp_rcu_lockdep_assert();
> +	opp_rcu_lockdep_assert(&opp->dev_opp->srcu_head.srcu);
>  
> -	tmp_opp = rcu_dereference(opp);
> +	tmp_opp = srcu_dereference_check(opp, &opp->dev_opp->srcu_head.srcu,
> +					 rcu_read_lock_held());
>  	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tmp_opp) || !tmp_opp->available)
>  		pr_err("%s: Invalid parameters\n", __func__);
>  	else
> @@ -268,9 +270,10 @@ unsigned long dev_pm_opp_get_freq(struct dev_pm_opp *opp)
>  	struct dev_pm_opp *tmp_opp;
>  	unsigned long f = 0;
>  
> -	opp_rcu_lockdep_assert();
> +	opp_rcu_lockdep_assert(&opp->dev_opp->srcu_head.srcu);
>  
> -	tmp_opp = rcu_dereference(opp);
> +	tmp_opp = srcu_dereference_check(opp, &opp->dev_opp->srcu_head.srcu,
> +					 rcu_read_lock_held());
>  	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tmp_opp) || !tmp_opp->available)
>  		pr_err("%s: Invalid parameters\n", __func__);
>  	else
> @@ -437,7 +440,7 @@ struct dev_pm_opp *dev_pm_opp_find_freq_exact(struct device *dev,
>  	struct device_opp *dev_opp;
>  	struct dev_pm_opp *temp_opp, *opp = ERR_PTR(-ERANGE);
>  
> -	opp_rcu_lockdep_assert();
> +	opp_rcu_lockdep_assert(NULL);
>  
>  	dev_opp = _find_device_opp(dev);
>  	if (IS_ERR(dev_opp)) {
> @@ -485,7 +488,7 @@ struct dev_pm_opp *dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil(struct device *dev,
>  	struct device_opp *dev_opp;
>  	struct dev_pm_opp *temp_opp, *opp = ERR_PTR(-ERANGE);
>  
> -	opp_rcu_lockdep_assert();
> +	opp_rcu_lockdep_assert(NULL);
>  
>  	if (!dev || !freq) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "%s: Invalid argument freq=%p\n", __func__, freq);
> @@ -535,7 +538,7 @@ struct dev_pm_opp *dev_pm_opp_find_freq_floor(struct device *dev,
>  	struct device_opp *dev_opp;
>  	struct dev_pm_opp *temp_opp, *opp = ERR_PTR(-ERANGE);
>  
> -	opp_rcu_lockdep_assert();
> +	opp_rcu_lockdep_assert(NULL);
>  
>  	if (!dev || !freq) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "%s: Invalid argument freq=%p\n", __func__, freq);

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

-- 
viresh

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-22 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-19  0:52 [PATCH v2 0/5] Support CPR on MSM8916 Stephen Boyd
2015-09-19  0:52 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-09-19  0:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] regulator: smd: Add floor and corner operations Stephen Boyd
2015-09-19  0:52   ` Stephen Boyd
2015-09-19 16:57   ` Mark Brown
2015-09-19 16:57     ` Mark Brown
2015-09-19 16:57     ` Mark Brown
2015-09-22 16:39     ` Stephen Boyd
2015-09-22 16:39       ` Stephen Boyd
2015-09-19  0:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] PM / OPP: Support adjusting OPP voltages at runtime Stephen Boyd
2015-09-19  0:52   ` Stephen Boyd
2015-09-22 16:50   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-09-22 16:50     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-09-22 16:50     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-09-22 17:46     ` Stephen Boyd
2015-09-22 17:46       ` Stephen Boyd
2015-09-19  0:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] OPP: Allow notifiers to call dev_pm_opp_get_{voltage, freq} RCU-free Stephen Boyd
2015-09-19  0:52   ` [PATCH v2 3/5] OPP: Allow notifiers to call dev_pm_opp_get_{voltage,freq} RCU-free Stephen Boyd
2015-09-19  0:52   ` [PATCH v2 3/5] OPP: Allow notifiers to call dev_pm_opp_get_{voltage, freq} RCU-free Stephen Boyd
2015-09-22 17:10   ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2015-09-22 17:10     ` [PATCH v2 3/5] OPP: Allow notifiers to call dev_pm_opp_get_{voltage,freq} RCU-free Viresh Kumar
2015-09-19  0:52 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] cpufreq-dt: Handle OPP voltage adjust events Stephen Boyd
2015-09-19  0:52   ` Stephen Boyd
2015-09-22 17:36   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-09-22 17:36     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-09-19  0:52 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] power: avs: Add support for CPR (Core Power Reduction) Stephen Boyd
2015-09-19  0:52   ` Stephen Boyd
2015-09-19 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Support CPR on MSM8916 Mark Brown
2015-09-19 13:46   ` Mark Brown
2015-09-25 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-25 22:03   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-28 18:48   ` Stephen Boyd
2015-09-28 18:48     ` Stephen Boyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150922171031.GH24314@linux \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=agross@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=collinsd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.