From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bugs in multipath scsi in 4.3-rc2
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 14:56:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151002125608.GB14899@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1443652494.2185.57.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 03:34:54PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> Perhaps we don't have to be that draconian. There's no real reason we
> can't autoload asynchronously. If the module isn't ready by the time we
> come to check the attachment, then it will attach to the device later
> when the module init routine runs.
I don't think this works. We're attaching just after the request_module
call, so modprobe doesn't really have a chance to finish before we
return.
> Should we do anything to limit the module_request floods? This will
> likely happen for every LUN of an ALUA system ... there can be hundreds
> of those.
Once the alua module is loaded there won't be any request_module calls.
If you build with device handler support but without ALUA support
you'll get a lot of calls, but that's not any different than probing
for other optional features.
Personally I think we probably should simple build ALUA support into
scsi_mod if SCSI_DH is selected, as that's part of the standard and
supported by any modern multi pathing device.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-02 12:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-25 12:16 Bugs in multipath scsi in 4.3-rc2 Paul Mackerras
2015-09-25 15:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-09-25 17:31 ` James Bottomley
2015-09-30 15:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-09-30 21:53 ` Tejun Heo
2015-09-30 22:34 ` James Bottomley
2015-10-02 12:56 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2015-10-02 13:25 ` James Bottomley
2015-10-02 13:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-02 13:44 ` James Bottomley
2015-10-04 7:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-12 12:45 ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-10-12 14:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-12 19:29 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-10-12 19:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-13 6:00 ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-10-13 11:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-12 14:51 ` James Bottomley
2015-10-01 4:34 ` Paul Mackerras
2015-10-02 12:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-08 4:59 ` Paul Mackerras
2015-09-25 16:28 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151002125608.GB14899@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.