All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
To: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>
Cc: Allessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
	David Dajun Chen <david.chen@diasemi.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	RTC <rtc-linux@googlegroups.com>,
	Support Opensource <support.opensource@diasemi.com>
Subject: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH V1] rtc: GPL copyright inconsistency fix
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 17:27:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151003152728.GD2694@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201510021025.t92AP2Bn026715@swsrvapps-01.diasemi.com>

On 02/10/2015 at 11:21:11 +0100, Steve Twiss wrote :
> From: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>
> 
> Fix misleading and inconsistent copyright header wording.
> 
> Alter the copyright header text and MODULE_LICENSE macro to ensure the
> GPL v2 licence description is correctly represented.
> 
> It will remove the incorrectly LGPL worded text. Words such as "Library"
> from the line "GNU Library General Public License"; and replace the word
> "library" with "program" in several other places.
> 
> The copyright should match the GPL v2 description as specified in the GNU
> license found here: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html
> 
> It should also match this copyright text with the correct MODULE_LICENSE
> macro text as found in the kernel: include/linux/module.h
> In this case "GNU Public License v2 or later" is linked with "GPL".
> 

I would have though diasemi would stick to GPL 2 only.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> This patch applies against linux-next and v4.3-rc3 
> 
> 
> 
>  drivers/rtc/rtc-da9063.c | 18 +++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
Applied, thanks.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
To: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>
Cc: Allessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
	David Dajun Chen <david.chen@diasemi.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	RTC <rtc-linux@googlegroups.com>,
	Support Opensource <support.opensource@diasemi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1] rtc: GPL copyright inconsistency fix
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 17:27:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151003152728.GD2694@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201510021025.t92AP2Bn026715@swsrvapps-01.diasemi.com>

On 02/10/2015 at 11:21:11 +0100, Steve Twiss wrote :
> From: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>
> 
> Fix misleading and inconsistent copyright header wording.
> 
> Alter the copyright header text and MODULE_LICENSE macro to ensure the
> GPL v2 licence description is correctly represented.
> 
> It will remove the incorrectly LGPL worded text. Words such as "Library"
> from the line "GNU Library General Public License"; and replace the word
> "library" with "program" in several other places.
> 
> The copyright should match the GPL v2 description as specified in the GNU
> license found here: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html
> 
> It should also match this copyright text with the correct MODULE_LICENSE
> macro text as found in the kernel: include/linux/module.h
> In this case "GNU Public License v2 or later" is linked with "GPL".
> 

I would have though diasemi would stick to GPL 2 only.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> This patch applies against linux-next and v4.3-rc3 
> 
> 
> 
>  drivers/rtc/rtc-da9063.c | 18 +++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
Applied, thanks.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-03 15:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-02 10:21 [rtc-linux] [PATCH V1] rtc: GPL copyright inconsistency fix Steve Twiss
2015-10-02 10:21 ` Steve Twiss
2015-10-03 15:27 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2015-10-03 15:27   ` Alexandre Belloni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151003152728.GD2694@piout.net \
    --to=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=david.chen@diasemi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com \
    --cc=support.opensource@diasemi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.