* [PATCH v4] gpio: Add GPIO support for the ACCES 104-IDIO-16
@ 2015-10-07 2:40 ` William Breathitt Gray
2015-10-07 3:14 ` [PATCH] gpio: fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci warnings kbuild test robot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: William Breathitt Gray @ 2015-10-07 2:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linus.walleij, gnurou; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-gpio
The ACCES 104-IDIO-16 family of PC/104 utility boards feature 16
optically isolated inputs and 16 optically isolated FET solid state
outputs. This driver provides GPIO support for these 32 channels of
digital I/O. Change-of-State detection interrupts are not supported.
GPIO 0-15 correspond to digital outputs 0-15, while GPIO 16-31
correspond to digital inputs 0-15. The base port address for the device
may be set via the a_104_idio_16_base module parameter.
Signed-off-by: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v4:
- Replace compile-time constant CONFIG_104_IDIO_16_BASE with module
paramater a_104_idio_16_base
- Return -ENODEV when gpio_get is called on outputs
- Replace global constant A_104_IDIO_16_EXTENT with struct
a_104_idio_16_gpio member extent
- Utilize platform API to reduce dependence on global data
drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 10 ++
drivers/gpio/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/gpio/gpio-104-idio-16.c | 196 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 207 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/gpio/gpio-104-idio-16.c
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
index 8949b3f..dc843e0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
@@ -684,6 +684,16 @@ config GPIO_SX150X
endmenu
+menu "ISA GPIO drivers"
+
+config GPIO_104_IDIO_16
+ tristate "ACCES 104-IDIO-16 GPIO support"
+ depends on X86
+ help
+ Enables GPIO support for the ACCES 104-IDIO-16 family.
+
+endmenu
+
menu "MFD GPIO expanders"
config GPIO_ADP5520
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Makefile b/drivers/gpio/Makefile
index f79a7c4..6f2fea5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/gpio/Makefile
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_ACPI) += gpiolib-acpi.o
# Device drivers. Generally keep list sorted alphabetically
obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_GENERIC) += gpio-generic.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_104_IDIO_16) += gpio-104-idio-16.o
obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_74X164) += gpio-74x164.o
obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_74XX_MMIO) += gpio-74xx-mmio.o
obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_ADNP) += gpio-adnp.o
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-104-idio-16.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-104-idio-16.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..45a2f1a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-104-idio-16.c
@@ -0,0 +1,196 @@
+/*
+ * GPIO driver for the ACCES 104-IDIO-16 family
+ * Copyright (C) 2015 William Breathitt Gray
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License, version 2, as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
+ * WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
+ * General Public License for more details.
+ */
+#include <linux/device.h>
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/errno.h>
+#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/ioport.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+
+static unsigned a_104_idio_16_base;
+module_param(a_104_idio_16_base, uint, 0);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(a_104_idio_16_base, "ACCES 104-IDIO-16 base address");
+
+/**
+ * struct a_104_idio_16_gpio - GPIO device private data structure
+ * @chip: instance of the gpio_chip
+ * @lock: synchronization lock to prevent gpio_set race conditions
+ * @base: base port address of the GPIO device
+ * @extent: extent of port address region of the GPIO device
+ * @out_state: output bits state
+ */
+struct a_104_idio_16_gpio {
+ struct gpio_chip chip;
+ spinlock_t lock;
+ unsigned base;
+ unsigned extent;
+ unsigned out_state;
+};
+
+static int a_104_idio_16_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip,
+ unsigned offset)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int a_104_idio_16_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip,
+ unsigned offset, int value)
+{
+ chip->set(chip, offset, value);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct a_104_idio_16_gpio *to_a104idio16gp(struct gpio_chip *gc)
+{
+ return container_of(gc, struct a_104_idio_16_gpio, chip);
+}
+
+static int a_104_idio_16_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
+{
+ struct a_104_idio_16_gpio *const a104idio16gp = to_a104idio16gp(chip);
+ const unsigned BIT_MASK = 1U << (offset-16);
+
+ if (offset < 16)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ if (offset < 24)
+ return !!(inb(a104idio16gp->base + 1) & BIT_MASK);
+
+ return !!(inb(a104idio16gp->base + 5) & (BIT_MASK>>8));
+}
+
+static void a_104_idio_16_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset,
+ int value)
+{
+ struct a_104_idio_16_gpio *const a104idio16gp = to_a104idio16gp(chip);
+ const unsigned BIT_MASK = 1U << offset;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ if (offset > 15)
+ return;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&a104idio16gp->lock, flags);
+
+ if (value)
+ a104idio16gp->out_state |= BIT_MASK;
+ else
+ a104idio16gp->out_state &= ~BIT_MASK;
+
+ if (offset > 7)
+ outb(~a104idio16gp->out_state >> 8, a104idio16gp->base + 4);
+ else
+ outb(~a104idio16gp->out_state, a104idio16gp->base);
+
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&a104idio16gp->lock, flags);
+}
+
+static int a_104_idio_16_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct a_104_idio_16_gpio *const a104idio16gp = pdev->dev.platform_data;
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ int err;
+
+ const unsigned BASE = a104idio16gp->base;
+ const unsigned EXTENT = a104idio16gp->extent;
+
+ if (!request_region(BASE, EXTENT, "104-idio-16")) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Unable to lock 104-idio-16 port addresses (0x%X-0x%X)\n",
+ BASE, BASE + EXTENT);
+ err = -EBUSY;
+ goto out_lock_a_104_idio_16_port;
+ }
+
+ spin_lock_init(&a104idio16gp->lock);
+
+ dev_info(dev, "104-IDIO-16 GPIO detected\n");
+ err = gpiochip_add(&a104idio16gp->chip);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(dev, "GPIO registering failed (%d)\n", err);
+ goto out_gpio_register;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+
+out_gpio_register:
+ release_region(BASE, EXTENT);
+out_lock_a_104_idio_16_port:
+ return err;
+}
+
+static int a_104_idio_16_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct a_104_idio_16_gpio *const a104idio16gp = pdev->dev.platform_data;
+
+ gpiochip_remove(&a104idio16gp->chip);
+ release_region(a104idio16gp->base, a104idio16gp->extent);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct platform_device *a_104_idio_16_device;
+
+static struct platform_driver a_104_idio_16_driver = {
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "104-idio-16",
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE
+ },
+ .remove = a_104_idio_16_remove
+};
+
+static void __exit a_104_idio_16_exit(void)
+{
+ dev_info(&a_104_idio_16_device->dev, "Exiting module\n");
+
+ platform_device_unregister(a_104_idio_16_device);
+ platform_driver_unregister(&a_104_idio_16_driver);
+}
+
+static int __init a_104_idio_16_init(void)
+{
+ struct a_104_idio_16_gpio a104idio16gp = {
+ .chip = {
+ .label = "104-IDIO-16 GPIO",
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ .base = -1,
+ .ngpio = 32,
+ .direction_input = a_104_idio_16_gpio_direction_input,
+ .direction_output = a_104_idio_16_gpio_direction_output,
+ .get = a_104_idio_16_gpio_get,
+ .set = a_104_idio_16_gpio_set
+ },
+ .base = a_104_idio_16_base,
+ .extent = 8
+ };
+
+ dev_info(&a_104_idio_16_device->dev, "Initializing module\n");
+
+ a_104_idio_16_device = platform_device_register_data(NULL,
+ "104-idio-16", -1, &a104idio16gp, sizeof(a104idio16gp));
+ if (IS_ERR(a_104_idio_16_device))
+ return PTR_ERR(a_104_idio_16_device);
+
+ return platform_driver_probe(&a_104_idio_16_driver, a_104_idio_16_probe);
+}
+
+module_init(a_104_idio_16_init);
+module_exit(a_104_idio_16_exit);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ACCES 104-IDIO-16 GPIO driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
--
2.4.9
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] gpio: fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci warnings
2015-10-07 2:40 ` William Breathitt Gray
@ 2015-10-07 3:14 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-16 14:47 ` Linus Walleij
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2015-10-07 3:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: William Breathitt Gray
Cc: kbuild-all, linus.walleij, gnurou, linux-kernel, linux-gpio
drivers/gpio/gpio-104-idio-16.c:151:3-8: No need to set .owner here. The core will do it.
Remove .owner field if calls are used which set it automatically
Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci
CC: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
gpio-104-idio-16.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-104-idio-16.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-104-idio-16.c
@@ -148,7 +148,6 @@ static struct platform_device *a_104_idi
static struct platform_driver a_104_idio_16_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "104-idio-16",
- .owner = THIS_MODULE
},
.remove = a_104_idio_16_remove
};
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4] gpio: Add GPIO support for the ACCES 104-IDIO-16
2015-10-07 2:40 ` William Breathitt Gray
@ 2015-10-07 3:14 kbuild test robot
2015-10-07 2:40 ` William Breathitt Gray
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2015-10-07 3:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: William Breathitt Gray
Cc: kbuild-all, linus.walleij, gnurou, linux-kernel, linux-gpio
Hi William,
[auto build test WARNING on v4.3-rc4 -- if it's inappropriate base, please ignore]
coccinelle warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-104-idio-16.c:151:3-8: No need to set .owner here. The core will do it.
Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] gpio: fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci warnings
2015-10-11 16:41 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
@ 2015-10-11 17:12 ` kbuild test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2015-10-11 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne
Cc: kbuild-all, linus.walleij, gnurou, linux-gpio, linux-kernel
drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65218.c:153:3-8: No need to set .owner here. The core will do it.
Remove .owner field if calls are used which set it automatically
Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci
CC: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nicolassaenzj@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
gpio-tps65218.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65218.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65218.c
@@ -150,7 +150,6 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tps65218_dt_matc
static struct platform_driver tps65218_gpio_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "tps65218-gpio",
- .owner = THIS_MODULE,
.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(tps65218_dt_match)
},
.probe = tps65218_gpio_probe,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gpio: fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci warnings
2015-10-07 3:14 ` [PATCH] gpio: fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci warnings kbuild test robot
@ 2015-10-16 14:47 ` Linus Walleij
2015-10-16 15:47 ` [kbuild-all] " Fengguang Wu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2015-10-16 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kbuild test robot
Cc: William Breathitt Gray, kbuild-all@01.org, Alexandre Courbot,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 5:14 AM, kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
> drivers/gpio/gpio-104-idio-16.c:151:3-8: No need to set .owner here. The core will do it.
>
> Remove .owner field if calls are used which set it automatically
>
> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci
>
> CC: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
This is confusing, I mix up the mails coming from my pushed git branches
with this new stuff that is obviously checking patches I haven't even applied.
It's better if these kbuild fixes are sent as Re: to the mail ID of the
patch so it appears in the same thread as the offending patch on the
mailing list.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] gpio: fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci warnings
2015-10-16 14:47 ` Linus Walleij
@ 2015-10-16 15:47 ` Fengguang Wu
2015-10-16 15:53 ` Fengguang Wu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Fengguang Wu @ 2015-10-16 15:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Walleij
Cc: Alexandre Courbot, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
William Breathitt Gray, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kbuild-all@01.org
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 04:47:23PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 5:14 AM, kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > drivers/gpio/gpio-104-idio-16.c:151:3-8: No need to set .owner here. The core will do it.
> >
> > Remove .owner field if calls are used which set it automatically
> >
> > Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci
> >
> > CC: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
>
> This is confusing, I mix up the mails coming from my pushed git branches
> with this new stuff that is obviously checking patches I haven't even applied.
> It's better if these kbuild fixes are sent as Re: to the mail ID of the
> patch so it appears in the same thread as the offending patch on the
> mailing list.
Hi Linus, the patch email does not start with "Re:", however it does contain
In-Reply-To: <1444997709-57293-2-git-send-email-ck.hu@mediatek.com>
So it should show up in the same thread as this email?
[RFC 2/2] drm/bridge: Add I2C based driver for ps8640 bridge
Thanks,
Fengguang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] gpio: fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci warnings
2015-10-16 15:47 ` [kbuild-all] " Fengguang Wu
@ 2015-10-16 15:53 ` Fengguang Wu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Fengguang Wu @ 2015-10-16 15:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Walleij
Cc: Alexandre Courbot, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
William Breathitt Gray, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kbuild-all@01.org
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:47:23PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 04:47:23PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 5:14 AM, kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > drivers/gpio/gpio-104-idio-16.c:151:3-8: No need to set .owner here. The core will do it.
> > >
> > > Remove .owner field if calls are used which set it automatically
> > >
> > > Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci
> > >
> > > CC: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> >
> > This is confusing, I mix up the mails coming from my pushed git branches
> > with this new stuff that is obviously checking patches I haven't even applied.
> > It's better if these kbuild fixes are sent as Re: to the mail ID of the
> > patch so it appears in the same thread as the offending patch on the
> > mailing list.
>
> Hi Linus, the patch email does not start with "Re:", however it does contain
>
> In-Reply-To: <1444997709-57293-2-git-send-email-ck.hu@mediatek.com>
>
> So it should show up in the same thread as this email?
>
> [RFC 2/2] drm/bridge: Add I2C based driver for ps8640 bridge
Sorry it's not that email, but here is the mutt thread view in my mbox:
Oct 06 William Breathi (7.8K:0) [PATCH v4] gpio: Add GPIO support for the ACCES 104-IDIO-16
Oct 07 kbuild test rob (0.9K:0) |->[PATCH] gpio: fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci warnings
Oct 16 Fengguang Wu (1.3K:0) | `->Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] gpio: fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci warnings
Oct 07 kbuild test rob (0.7K:0) `->Re: [PATCH v4] gpio: Add GPIO support for the ACCES 104-IDIO-16
Thanks,
Fengguang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] gpio: fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci warnings
2022-05-03 10:00 [asahilinux:bits/110-smc 3/14] drivers/gpio/gpio-macsmc.c:230:3-8: No need to set .owner here. The core will do it kernel test robot
@ 2022-05-03 9:53 ` kernel test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2022-05-03 9:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hector Martin; +Cc: kbuild-all, linux-kernel
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
drivers/gpio/gpio-macsmc.c:230:3-8: No need to set .owner here. The core will do it.
Remove .owner field if calls are used which set it automatically
Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
---
tree: https://github.com/AsahiLinux/linux bits/110-smc
head: dc3db43287ff1d44b447fff8ed6386b28b339f1c
commit: a29b7d982f099846c00493140bbf5b6aff25c948 [3/14] gpio: Add new gpio-macsmc driver for Apple Macs
:::::: branch date: 26 hours ago
:::::: commit date: 27 hours ago
drivers/gpio/gpio-macsmc.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-macsmc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-macsmc.c
@@ -227,7 +227,6 @@ static int macsmc_gpio_probe(struct plat
static struct platform_driver macsmc_gpio_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "macsmc-gpio",
- .owner = THIS_MODULE,
},
.probe = macsmc_gpio_probe,
};
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-05-03 9:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-10-07 3:14 [PATCH v4] gpio: Add GPIO support for the ACCES 104-IDIO-16 kbuild test robot
2015-10-07 2:40 ` William Breathitt Gray
2015-10-07 3:14 ` [PATCH] gpio: fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci warnings kbuild test robot
2015-10-16 14:47 ` Linus Walleij
2015-10-16 15:47 ` [kbuild-all] " Fengguang Wu
2015-10-16 15:53 ` Fengguang Wu
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-10-11 17:12 [PATCH] gpio: add tps65218 gpio driver kbuild test robot
2015-10-11 16:41 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2015-10-11 17:12 ` [PATCH] gpio: fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci warnings kbuild test robot
2022-05-03 10:00 [asahilinux:bits/110-smc 3/14] drivers/gpio/gpio-macsmc.c:230:3-8: No need to set .owner here. The core will do it kernel test robot
2022-05-03 9:53 ` [PATCH] gpio: fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci warnings kernel test robot
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.