All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: porter: add SDHI0/2 DT support
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 02:12:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151008021247.GD8756@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5614FBB3.5060806@cogentembedded.com>

On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 02:02:11PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> On 10/7/2015 6:39 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> 
> >>Define the Porter board dependent part of the SDHI0/2 device nodes along with
> >>the  necessary  voltage regulators (note that the Vcc regulators are dummy --
> >>they are required but don't actually exist on the board). Also, GPIOs have to
> >>be used for the CD and WP signals due to the SDHI driver constraints...
> >>
> >>This patch is analogous to the commit 1299df03d719 (ARM: shmobile: henninger:
> >>add SDHI0/2 DT support) as there  are no differences between those boards in
> >>this respect.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
> >>
> >>---
> >>This patch is against the 'renesas-devel-20151006-v4.3-rc4' tag of Simon
> >>Horman's 'renesas.git' repo.
> >
> >Thanks I have queued this up after addressing some issues
> >in the changelog that checkpatch complained about:
> >
> >* text > 75 characters wide
> >* Missing '"' around name of patch referred to
> >
> >Its looking like there is already quite a log shared between
> 
>    Lot?
> 
> >r8a7791-porter.dts and r8a7791-henninger.dts. Do you have any
> >thoughts on consolidating or sharing common elements between
> >them somehow?
> 
>    I'm still planning to remove the Henninger's .dts for good. It was never
> sold and so had no users outside Renesas (and Cogent Embedded), I was told.

Thanks, that sounds like a good plan to me.
Do you have any thoughts on when?

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: horms@verge.net.au (Simon Horman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: porter: add SDHI0/2 DT support
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 11:12:47 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151008021247.GD8756@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5614FBB3.5060806@cogentembedded.com>

On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 02:02:11PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> On 10/7/2015 6:39 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> 
> >>Define the Porter board dependent part of the SDHI0/2 device nodes along with
> >>the  necessary  voltage regulators (note that the Vcc regulators are dummy --
> >>they are required but don't actually exist on the board). Also, GPIOs have to
> >>be used for the CD and WP signals due to the SDHI driver constraints...
> >>
> >>This patch is analogous to the commit 1299df03d719 (ARM: shmobile: henninger:
> >>add SDHI0/2 DT support) as there  are no differences between those boards in
> >>this respect.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
> >>
> >>---
> >>This patch is against the 'renesas-devel-20151006-v4.3-rc4' tag of Simon
> >>Horman's 'renesas.git' repo.
> >
> >Thanks I have queued this up after addressing some issues
> >in the changelog that checkpatch complained about:
> >
> >* text > 75 characters wide
> >* Missing '"' around name of patch referred to
> >
> >Its looking like there is already quite a log shared between
> 
>    Lot?
> 
> >r8a7791-porter.dts and r8a7791-henninger.dts. Do you have any
> >thoughts on consolidating or sharing common elements between
> >them somehow?
> 
>    I'm still planning to remove the Henninger's .dts for good. It was never
> sold and so had no users outside Renesas (and Cogent Embedded), I was told.

Thanks, that sounds like a good plan to me.
Do you have any thoughts on when?

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org,
	magnus.damm@gmail.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: porter: add SDHI0/2 DT support
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 11:12:47 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151008021247.GD8756@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5614FBB3.5060806@cogentembedded.com>

On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 02:02:11PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> On 10/7/2015 6:39 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> 
> >>Define the Porter board dependent part of the SDHI0/2 device nodes along with
> >>the  necessary  voltage regulators (note that the Vcc regulators are dummy --
> >>they are required but don't actually exist on the board). Also, GPIOs have to
> >>be used for the CD and WP signals due to the SDHI driver constraints...
> >>
> >>This patch is analogous to the commit 1299df03d719 (ARM: shmobile: henninger:
> >>add SDHI0/2 DT support) as there  are no differences between those boards in
> >>this respect.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
> >>
> >>---
> >>This patch is against the 'renesas-devel-20151006-v4.3-rc4' tag of Simon
> >>Horman's 'renesas.git' repo.
> >
> >Thanks I have queued this up after addressing some issues
> >in the changelog that checkpatch complained about:
> >
> >* text > 75 characters wide
> >* Missing '"' around name of patch referred to
> >
> >Its looking like there is already quite a log shared between
> 
>    Lot?
> 
> >r8a7791-porter.dts and r8a7791-henninger.dts. Do you have any
> >thoughts on consolidating or sharing common elements between
> >them somehow?
> 
>    I'm still planning to remove the Henninger's .dts for good. It was never
> sold and so had no users outside Renesas (and Cogent Embedded), I was told.

Thanks, that sounds like a good plan to me.
Do you have any thoughts on when?

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-08  2:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-06 23:05 [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: porter: add SDHI0/2 DT support Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-06 23:05 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-06 23:05 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-07  3:39 ` Simon Horman
2015-10-07  3:39   ` Simon Horman
2015-10-07  3:39   ` Simon Horman
2015-10-07 11:02   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-07 11:02     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-07 11:02     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-08  2:12     ` Simon Horman [this message]
2015-10-08  2:12       ` Simon Horman
2015-10-08  2:12       ` Simon Horman
2015-10-08 10:54       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-08 10:54         ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-08 10:54         ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-08 11:08         ` Simon Horman
2015-10-08 11:08           ` Simon Horman
2015-10-08 11:08           ` Simon Horman
2015-10-07 19:34   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-07 19:34     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-07 19:34     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-08  2:13     ` Simon Horman
2015-10-08  2:13       ` Simon Horman
2015-10-08  2:13       ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151008021247.GD8756@verge.net.au \
    --to=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.