All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thierry Reding <treding-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka-kv7WeFo6aLtBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
	<sebastian-E0PNVn5OA6ohrxcnuTQ+TQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: Availability of psci_smp_available depends on CONFIG_SMP
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 18:04:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151008160427.GA29417@ulmo.nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151006151857.GA2416-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2101 bytes --]

On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 04:18:58PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 10:11:24AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 08:39:43AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > > Ensure that we can use psci_smp_available without checking for
> > > CONFIG_SMP first.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka-kv7WeFo6aLtBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm/include/asm/psci.h | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/psci.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/psci.h
> > > index 68ee3ce..ff956f4 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/psci.h
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/psci.h
> > > @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
> > >  
> > >  extern struct smp_operations psci_smp_ops;
> > >  
> > > -#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_PSCI
> > > +#if defined(CONFIG_ARM_PSCI) && defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> > >  bool psci_smp_available(void);
> > >  #else
> > >  static inline bool psci_smp_available(void) { return false; }
> > 
> > Hi Will,
> 
> Hi Thierry,
> 
> > you had questions about this when this was first submitted back in
> > May[0], but discussion stalled. Can you take another look, please?
> > 
> > I think irrespective of what the series is trying to do this is a
> > correct fix. The arch/arm/kernel/psci_smp.c file is only compiled if
> > both ARM_PSCI and SMP are selected. Builds break if we don't mirror
> > that conditional in the header because for ARM_PSCI && !SMP no dummy
> > will be defined, but the implementation for the prototype won't be
> > available either, leading to a linker error.
> 
> Sure, I'm fine with this patch in isolation, I just didn't (don't) fully
> grok what the series is trying to achieve.

The goal is to prevent the kernel from registering a CPU idle driver if
PSCI is going to be used for SMP. This is necessary because both the CPU
idle driver and the PSCI implementation (provided by U-Boot in this
case) access the same resources. The effect of having both enabled is
usually that the system will simply hang sometime during boot.

Thierry

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: treding@nvidia.com (Thierry Reding)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: Availability of psci_smp_available depends on CONFIG_SMP
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 18:04:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151008160427.GA29417@ulmo.nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151006151857.GA2416@arm.com>

On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 04:18:58PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 10:11:24AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 08:39:43AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > > Ensure that we can use psci_smp_available without checking for
> > > CONFIG_SMP first.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm/include/asm/psci.h | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/psci.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/psci.h
> > > index 68ee3ce..ff956f4 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/psci.h
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/psci.h
> > > @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
> > >  
> > >  extern struct smp_operations psci_smp_ops;
> > >  
> > > -#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_PSCI
> > > +#if defined(CONFIG_ARM_PSCI) && defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> > >  bool psci_smp_available(void);
> > >  #else
> > >  static inline bool psci_smp_available(void) { return false; }
> > 
> > Hi Will,
> 
> Hi Thierry,
> 
> > you had questions about this when this was first submitted back in
> > May[0], but discussion stalled. Can you take another look, please?
> > 
> > I think irrespective of what the series is trying to do this is a
> > correct fix. The arch/arm/kernel/psci_smp.c file is only compiled if
> > both ARM_PSCI and SMP are selected. Builds break if we don't mirror
> > that conditional in the header because for ARM_PSCI && !SMP no dummy
> > will be defined, but the implementation for the prototype won't be
> > available either, leading to a linker error.
> 
> Sure, I'm fine with this patch in isolation, I just didn't (don't) fully
> grok what the series is trying to achieve.

The goal is to prevent the kernel from registering a CPU idle driver if
PSCI is going to be used for SMP. This is necessary because both the CPU
idle driver and the PSCI implementation (provided by U-Boot in this
case) access the same resources. The effect of having both enabled is
usually that the system will simply hang sometime during boot.

Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20151008/586b161c/attachment-0001.sig>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-10-08 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-23  6:39 [PATCH v2 0/2] Make Tegra cpuidle driver PSCI compatible Jan Kiszka
2015-09-23  6:39 ` Jan Kiszka
     [not found] ` <cover.1442990383.git.jan.kiszka-kv7WeFo6aLtBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-23  6:39   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: Availability of psci_smp_available depends on CONFIG_SMP Jan Kiszka
2015-09-23  6:39     ` Jan Kiszka
     [not found]     ` <8b94f7869972d64f442f97208707a5856cbc8b14.1442990383.git.jan.kiszka-kv7WeFo6aLtBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-06  8:11       ` Thierry Reding
2015-10-06  8:11         ` Thierry Reding
     [not found]         ` <20151006081122.GA21527-AwZRO8vwLAwmlAP/+Wk3EA@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-06 15:18           ` Will Deacon
2015-10-06 15:18             ` Will Deacon
     [not found]             ` <20151006151857.GA2416-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-08 16:04               ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2015-10-08 16:04                 ` Thierry Reding
2015-11-12  9:43               ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-11-12  9:43                 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
     [not found]                 ` <20151112094332.GA4645-E0PNVn5OA6ohrxcnuTQ+TQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-11-12  9:49                   ` Will Deacon
2015-11-12  9:49                     ` Will Deacon
     [not found]                     ` <20151112094920.GB20270-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2015-11-12 10:07                       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-11-12 10:07                         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-09-23  6:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: tegra: Disable cpuidle driver if PSCI is present Jan Kiszka
2015-09-23  6:39   ` Jan Kiszka
     [not found]   ` <5151ffebe8611545c55f8cc499cf2368b1b789c4.1442990383.git.jan.kiszka-kv7WeFo6aLtBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-06  8:21     ` Thierry Reding
2015-10-06  8:21       ` Thierry Reding
     [not found]       ` <20151006082106.GB21527-AwZRO8vwLAwmlAP/+Wk3EA@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-06  8:36         ` Jan Kiszka
2015-10-06  8:36           ` Jan Kiszka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151008160427.GA29417@ulmo.nvidia.com \
    --to=treding-ddmlm1+adcrqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=jan.kiszka-kv7WeFo6aLtBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=sebastian-E0PNVn5OA6ohrxcnuTQ+TQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.