From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
stephen@networkplumber.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf 1/3] netfilter: conntrack: fix crash on timeout object removal
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 17:08:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151012150804.GA10474@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201510052348.MdM5Kc4Y%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 11:08:57PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Pablo,
>
[...]
>
> sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>
> >> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:956:54: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces)
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:956:54: expected struct ctnl_timeout *timeout
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:956:54: got struct ctnl_timeout [noderef] <asn:4>*timeout
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:1463:9: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces)
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:1468:9: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces)
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:1744:9: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces)
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:1745:9: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces)
>
> vim +956 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
[...]
>
> 60b5f8f7 Pablo Neira Ayuso 2012-03-23 955 if (timeout_ext)
> 60b5f8f7 Pablo Neira Ayuso 2012-03-23 @956 nf_ct_timeout_ext_add(ct, timeout_ext->timeout, GFP_ATOMIC);
Fixed here through before pushing out this patch:
nf_ct_timeout_ext_add(ct, rcu_deference(timeout_ext->timeout), GFP_ATOMIC);
I can't see any sparse warning anymore with the change above.
Thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-12 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-05 14:51 [PATCH nf 1/3] netfilter: conntrack: fix crash on timeout object removal Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-10-05 14:51 ` [PATCH nf 2/3] nfnetlink_cttimeout: add rcu_barrier() on module removal Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-10-05 14:51 ` [PATCH nf 3/3] netfilter: xt_CT: don't put back reference to timeout policy object Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-10-05 15:08 ` [PATCH nf 1/3] netfilter: conntrack: fix crash on timeout object removal kbuild test robot
2015-10-12 15:08 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151012150804.GA10474@salvia \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.