Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] mfd: arizona: Update DT binding documentation for mic detection

[Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>]

On Mon, 12 Oct 2015, Chanwoo Choi wrote:

> On 2015년 10월 12일 19:16, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> > Hi Charles,
> > 
> > On 2015년 10월 12일 17:45, Charles Keepax wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 01:26:42PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 07 Oct 2015, Mark Brown wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 05:29:22PM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
> >>>>> Add additional bindings to allow configuration of the system specific
> >>>>> microphone detection settings.
> >>>>
> >>>> This all seems pretty much fine to me - the things it is controlling are
> >>>> fairly specific to the way the former Wolfson devices do, they only
> >>>> really make sense with a fairly particular algorithm which isn't widely
> >>>> implemented.
> >>>
> >>> Is that an Ack?
> >>
> >> I am guessing Mark is slightly hesitant to ack as he probably
> >> doesn't want to add reviewing all our jack detection bindings to
> >> his already fairly sizable work load and doing so here likely
> >> means it will be expected in the future. From talking to people at
> >> LinuxCon it looks like it is pretty unlikely the DT maintainers
> >> will be acking individual bindings as well, basically they are
> >> only really looking at major/framework things and leaving the
> >> rest to subsystem maintainers.
> >>
> >> Given that these patches only touch MFD/Extcon and extcon
> >> is a subsystem designed to handle things like jack detection
> >> isn't it really sufficient that you and Chanwoo have looked this
> >> and are happy with it? Otherwise I really don't see anyway to
> >> move this forward and would appreciate any suggestions?
> > 
> > I'm positive about your patches. After receiving the ack from MFD maintainer
> > I want to apply this patch-set on extcon git repository.
> > 
> > Also, I reviewed this patch on previous patch[1].
> > [1]https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/11/81
> 
> As you said, this patch touch MFD and EXTCON subsystem.
> If you get the Ack or agreement from MFD maintainer,
> I'm willing to apply it on extcon git.
> 
> Also, If this patch dont receive the additional ack message
> unitl the end of this week, I'll merge patch1-3 on extcon-next branch
> for Linux 4.4.

Absolutely not!

I should be extremely cross if you 'go over my head' and apply MFD
patches without the correct Acks.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog