All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "hzwulibin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org" <hzwulibin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: "ceph-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<ceph-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	ceph-users <ceph-users-Qp0mS5GaXlQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Does SSD Journal improve the performance?
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 09:29:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201510150929011726350@gmail.com> (raw)


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 791 bytes --]

Hi, 

It should be sure SSD Journal will improve the performance of IOPS. But unfortunately it's not in my test.

I have two pools with the same number of osds:
pool1, ssdj_sas:
9 osd servers, 8 OSDs(SAS) on every server
Journal on SSD, one SSD disk for 4 SAS disks.

pool 2, sas:
9 osd servers, 8 OSDs(SAS) on every server
Journal on SAS disk itself。

I use rbd to create a volume in pool1 and pool2 separately and use fio to test
the rand write IOPS。here is the fio configuration:

rw=randwrite
ioengine=libaio
direct=1
iodepth=128
bs=4k
numjobs=1

The result i got is:
volume in pool1, about 5k
volume in pool2, about 12k

It's a big gap here, anyone can give me some suggestion here?

ceph version: hammer(0.94.3)
kernel: 3.10



hzwulibin@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 4488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 178 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users-idqoXFIVOFJgJs9I8MT0rw@public.gmane.org
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

                 reply	other threads:[~2015-10-15  1:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201510150929011726350@gmail.com \
    --to=hzwulibin-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=ceph-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=ceph-users-Qp0mS5GaXlQ@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.