* Does SSD Journal improve the performance?
@ 2015-10-15 1:29 hzwulibin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: hzwulibin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w @ 2015-10-15 1:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ceph-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, ceph-users
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 791 bytes --]
Hi,
It should be sure SSD Journal will improve the performance of IOPS. But unfortunately it's not in my test.
I have two pools with the same number of osds:
pool1, ssdj_sas:
9 osd servers, 8 OSDs(SAS) on every server
Journal on SSD, one SSD disk for 4 SAS disks.
pool 2, sas:
9 osd servers, 8 OSDs(SAS) on every server
Journal on SAS disk itself。
I use rbd to create a volume in pool1 and pool2 separately and use fio to test
the rand write IOPS。here is the fio configuration:
rw=randwrite
ioengine=libaio
direct=1
iodepth=128
bs=4k
numjobs=1
The result i got is:
volume in pool1, about 5k
volume in pool2, about 12k
It's a big gap here, anyone can give me some suggestion here?
ceph version: hammer(0.94.3)
kernel: 3.10
hzwulibin@gmail.com
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 4488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 178 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users-idqoXFIVOFJgJs9I8MT0rw@public.gmane.org
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2015-10-15 1:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-10-15 1:29 Does SSD Journal improve the performance? hzwulibin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.