Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 4/4] README.bisection: New consumer-oriented document

[Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>]

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 05:51:25PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Wei Liu writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 4/4] README.bisection: New consumer-oriented document"):
> > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 05:15:35PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > +         |       url used for fetching the bits
> > > +	 |
> > > +         ` Identifier indicating the purpose for which the tree
> > > +	   is used.
> > 
> > A tab was inserted here.
> 
> Thanks, will fix.
> 
> > > +Progress Reports
> ...
> > > +These contain the roughly same information; instead of "complete" they
> > > +may say "running", "inconclusive", "unreproducible", etc.
> > 
> > On xen-devel there are only "complete" emails. It might be helpful to
> > send "unreproducible" and / or "inconclusive" emails as well? What I'm
> > thinking is that it would be helpful to clearly indicate human
> > intervention is needed.
> 
> There's quite a lot of these.  In principle, around one for each
> "REGR" ever mentioned in a main push gate flight report.
> 
> I don't think anyone wants to read them routinely.  I certainly don't.
> If one is interested in a particular failure, it's easy enough to go
> into the list and find the right one.
> 

OK then.

> Ian.