From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
Cc: <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
<pawel.moll@arm.com>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
<ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>, <galak@codeaurora.org>,
<sboyd@codeaurora.org>, <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] clk: berlin: bg2q: remove CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag for sdio clk
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 18:08:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151021180856.217e11ea@xhacker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151021095454.20687.98330@quantum>
Dear Michael,
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 02:54:54 -0700
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com> wrote:
> Quoting Michael Turquette (2015-10-21 02:30:39)
> > Quoting Jisheng Zhang (2015-10-20 04:16:46)
> > > Since we have added the necessary two clks' properties in dts, we can
> > > remove the "sdio" clk's CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag now.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
> >
> > Applied to clk-next.
>
> So the sdhci change was dropped from v2. Do you want me to Ack these
> instead so you can send them all together?
I'll send another patch to for the sdhci change. it doesn't matter even the
sdhci change delay a merge window because no functionality changes in the
sdhci commit.
It's better we firstly take these clk clean ups because it saves power a bit
and clean up the CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag.
Hi Sebastian,
What do you think?
Thanks,
Jisheng
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jszhang@marvell.com (Jisheng Zhang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] clk: berlin: bg2q: remove CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag for sdio clk
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 18:08:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151021180856.217e11ea@xhacker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151021095454.20687.98330@quantum>
Dear Michael,
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 02:54:54 -0700
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com> wrote:
> Quoting Michael Turquette (2015-10-21 02:30:39)
> > Quoting Jisheng Zhang (2015-10-20 04:16:46)
> > > Since we have added the necessary two clks' properties in dts, we can
> > > remove the "sdio" clk's CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag now.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
> >
> > Applied to clk-next.
>
> So the sdhci change was dropped from v2. Do you want me to Ack these
> instead so you can send them all together?
I'll send another patch to for the sdhci change. it doesn't matter even the
sdhci change delay a merge window because no functionality changes in the
sdhci commit.
It's better we firstly take these clk clean ups because it saves power a bit
and clean up the CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag.
Hi Sebastian,
What do you think?
Thanks,
Jisheng
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
Cc: sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org,
sboyd@codeaurora.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] clk: berlin: bg2q: remove CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag for sdio clk
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 18:08:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151021180856.217e11ea@xhacker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151021095454.20687.98330@quantum>
Dear Michael,
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 02:54:54 -0700
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com> wrote:
> Quoting Michael Turquette (2015-10-21 02:30:39)
> > Quoting Jisheng Zhang (2015-10-20 04:16:46)
> > > Since we have added the necessary two clks' properties in dts, we can
> > > remove the "sdio" clk's CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag now.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
> >
> > Applied to clk-next.
>
> So the sdhci change was dropped from v2. Do you want me to Ack these
> instead so you can send them all together?
I'll send another patch to for the sdhci change. it doesn't matter even the
sdhci change delay a merge window because no functionality changes in the
sdhci commit.
It's better we firstly take these clk clean ups because it saves power a bit
and clean up the CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag.
Hi Sebastian,
What do you think?
Thanks,
Jisheng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-21 10:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-20 11:16 [PATCH v2 0/4] berlin sdhci clock clean up Jisheng Zhang
2015-10-20 11:16 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-10-20 11:16 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-10-20 11:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] ARM: dts: berlin: correct BG2Q's sdhci2 2nd clock Jisheng Zhang
2015-10-20 11:16 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-10-20 11:16 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-10-20 11:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] ARM: dts: berlin: add 2nd clock for BG2Q sdhci0 and sdhci1 Jisheng Zhang
2015-10-20 11:16 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-10-20 11:16 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-10-20 11:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] clk: berlin: bg2q: remove CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag for sdio clk Jisheng Zhang
2015-10-20 11:16 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-10-20 11:16 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-10-21 9:30 ` Michael Turquette
2015-10-21 9:30 ` Michael Turquette
2015-10-21 9:30 ` Michael Turquette
2015-10-21 9:30 ` Michael Turquette
2015-10-21 9:54 ` Michael Turquette
2015-10-21 9:54 ` Michael Turquette
2015-10-21 9:54 ` Michael Turquette
2015-10-21 9:54 ` Michael Turquette
2015-10-21 10:08 ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2015-10-21 10:08 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-10-21 10:08 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-10-20 11:16 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] clk: berlin: bg2: " Jisheng Zhang
2015-10-20 11:16 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-10-20 11:16 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-10-21 9:30 ` Michael Turquette
2015-10-21 9:30 ` Michael Turquette
2015-10-21 9:30 ` Michael Turquette
2015-10-21 9:30 ` Michael Turquette
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151021180856.217e11ea@xhacker \
--to=jszhang@marvell.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.