From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: Kristen Accardi <kaccardi@gmail.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <glikely@secretlab.ca>,
"ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
<ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
tech-board-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
tech-board <tech-board@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"lwn@lwn.net" <lwn@lwn.net>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections and Nomination process
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 21:51:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151023045131.GD9769@x> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH3eK3Sw1UzJh2dHosM0d7VJLvQt8jtRzcj9y4POTB5z0gO0Jw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 08:00:20PM -0700, Kristen Accardi wrote:
> On Oct 22, 2015 7:04 PM, "Neil Brown" <neilb@suse.com> wrote:
> >
> > Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> writes:
> >
> > >
> > > Is there a good description of what is expected of a TAB member? How
> much time
> > > is involved? What makes a great TAB member?
> > >
> > > I've found:
> http://www.linuxfoundation.org/programs/advisory-councils/tab
> > >
> > > I've read the charter and scanned some of the minutes, but I'd still
> like to
> > > hear from some of the "incumbants". Specifically, what makes you
> successful as a
> > > member of the TAB?
> >
> > Also on the topic of the TAB and elections, I cannot figure out what:
> >
> > "Only one vote per candidate will be counted."
> >
> > means in:
> >
> > Voting:
> > -------
> > Each person present at the time of the election shall be handed a printed
> > ballot. Voters may vote for as many candidates as they wish. Only one
> > vote per candidate will be counted. A space will be provided where
> > they can fill out the ballot in private and place it into a box to be
> > counted in private.
> >
> >
> > in
> >
> http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/technical-advisory-board-tab/minutes-july-2015-tab-meeting
> >
> > Is it "Only one vote per candidate per voter will be counted"?
>
> Sorry this was a bit confusing. Basically, it means you can vote for as
> many candidates as you like, but if you can't vote multiple times for the
> same candidate on your ballot.
So, in other words, "this is approval voting, not range voting"?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: Kristen Accardi <kaccardi@gmail.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <glikely@secretlab.ca>,
"ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
<ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
tech-board-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>,
tech-board <tech-board@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"lwn@lwn.net" <lwn@lwn.net>, Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Tech-board-discuss] [Ksummit-discuss] Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections and Nomination process
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 21:51:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151023045131.GD9769@x> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH3eK3Sw1UzJh2dHosM0d7VJLvQt8jtRzcj9y4POTB5z0gO0Jw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 08:00:20PM -0700, Kristen Accardi wrote:
> On Oct 22, 2015 7:04 PM, "Neil Brown" <neilb@suse.com> wrote:
> >
> > Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> writes:
> >
> > >
> > > Is there a good description of what is expected of a TAB member? How
> much time
> > > is involved? What makes a great TAB member?
> > >
> > > I've found:
> http://www.linuxfoundation.org/programs/advisory-councils/tab
> > >
> > > I've read the charter and scanned some of the minutes, but I'd still
> like to
> > > hear from some of the "incumbants". Specifically, what makes you
> successful as a
> > > member of the TAB?
> >
> > Also on the topic of the TAB and elections, I cannot figure out what:
> >
> > "Only one vote per candidate will be counted."
> >
> > means in:
> >
> > Voting:
> > -------
> > Each person present at the time of the election shall be handed a printed
> > ballot. Voters may vote for as many candidates as they wish. Only one
> > vote per candidate will be counted. A space will be provided where
> > they can fill out the ballot in private and place it into a box to be
> > counted in private.
> >
> >
> > in
> >
> http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/technical-advisory-board-tab/minutes-july-2015-tab-meeting
> >
> > Is it "Only one vote per candidate per voter will be counted"?
>
> Sorry this was a bit confusing. Basically, it means you can vote for as
> many candidates as you like, but if you can't vote multiple times for the
> same candidate on your ballot.
So, in other words, "this is approval voting, not range voting"?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: Kristen Accardi <kaccardi@gmail.com>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>, Grant Likely <glikely@secretlab.ca>,
"ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
<ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
tech-board-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
tech-board <tech-board@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"lwn@lwn.net" <lwn@lwn.net>, Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Tech-board-discuss] [Ksummit-discuss] Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections and Nomination process
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 21:51:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151023045131.GD9769@x> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH3eK3Sw1UzJh2dHosM0d7VJLvQt8jtRzcj9y4POTB5z0gO0Jw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 08:00:20PM -0700, Kristen Accardi wrote:
> On Oct 22, 2015 7:04 PM, "Neil Brown" <neilb@suse.com> wrote:
> >
> > Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> writes:
> >
> > >
> > > Is there a good description of what is expected of a TAB member? How
> much time
> > > is involved? What makes a great TAB member?
> > >
> > > I've found:
> http://www.linuxfoundation.org/programs/advisory-councils/tab
> > >
> > > I've read the charter and scanned some of the minutes, but I'd still
> like to
> > > hear from some of the "incumbants". Specifically, what makes you
> successful as a
> > > member of the TAB?
> >
> > Also on the topic of the TAB and elections, I cannot figure out what:
> >
> > "Only one vote per candidate will be counted."
> >
> > means in:
> >
> > Voting:
> > -------
> > Each person present at the time of the election shall be handed a printed
> > ballot. Voters may vote for as many candidates as they wish. Only one
> > vote per candidate will be counted. A space will be provided where
> > they can fill out the ballot in private and place it into a box to be
> > counted in private.
> >
> >
> > in
> >
> http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/technical-advisory-board-tab/minutes-july-2015-tab-meeting
> >
> > Is it "Only one vote per candidate per voter will be counted"?
>
> Sorry this was a bit confusing. Basically, it means you can vote for as
> many candidates as you like, but if you can't vote multiple times for the
> same candidate on your ballot.
So, in other words, "this is approval voting, not range voting"?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-23 4:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-06 10:06 [Ksummit-discuss] Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections and Nomination process Grant Likely
2015-10-06 10:06 ` Grant Likely
2015-10-06 10:06 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Grant Likely
2015-10-06 14:21 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Josh Triplett
2015-10-06 14:21 ` Josh Triplett
2015-10-06 14:21 ` Josh Triplett
2015-10-13 8:06 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Grant Likely
2015-10-13 8:06 ` Grant Likely
2015-10-08 21:02 ` Shuah Khan
2015-10-13 8:08 ` Grant Likely
2015-10-11 4:20 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Ric Wheeler
2015-10-11 4:20 ` Ric Wheeler
2015-10-11 4:20 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Ric Wheeler
2015-10-13 8:12 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Grant Likely
2015-10-13 8:12 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Grant Likely
2015-10-13 13:09 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Sage Weil
2015-10-13 13:09 ` Sage Weil
2015-10-13 13:09 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Sage Weil
2015-10-14 17:48 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Grant Likely
2015-10-14 17:48 ` Grant Likely
2015-10-14 17:48 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Grant Likely
2015-10-13 5:19 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Kees Cook
2015-10-13 5:19 ` Kees Cook
2015-10-13 5:19 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Kees Cook
2015-10-13 8:10 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Grant Likely
2015-10-13 8:10 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Grant Likely
2015-10-13 16:11 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Steven Rostedt
2015-10-13 16:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-10-13 16:11 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Steven Rostedt
2015-10-14 17:14 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-14 17:37 ` Dave Taht
2015-10-15 21:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-10-15 21:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-10-20 0:54 ` Grant Likely
2015-10-20 0:54 ` Grant Likely
2015-10-20 0:54 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Grant Likely
2015-10-20 12:39 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Theodore Ts'o
2015-10-20 12:39 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-10-20 12:39 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-10-20 23:20 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Grant Likely
2015-10-20 23:20 ` Grant Likely
2015-10-25 8:06 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Grant Likely
2015-10-25 8:06 ` Grant Likely
2015-10-25 8:06 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Grant Likely
2015-10-25 8:43 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Grant Likely
2015-10-25 8:43 ` Grant Likely
2015-10-25 8:43 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Grant Likely
2015-10-22 21:03 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Darren Hart
2015-10-22 21:03 ` Darren Hart
2015-10-22 21:03 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Darren Hart
2015-10-23 1:10 ` Neil Brown
2015-10-23 1:10 ` Neil Brown
2015-10-23 2:04 ` Neil Brown
2015-10-23 2:04 ` Neil Brown
2015-10-23 2:04 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Neil Brown
2015-10-23 3:00 ` Kristen Accardi
2015-10-23 3:00 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Kristen Accardi
2015-10-23 4:51 ` Josh Triplett [this message]
2015-10-23 4:51 ` Josh Triplett
2015-10-23 4:51 ` Josh Triplett
2015-10-23 5:54 ` Neil Brown
2015-10-23 5:54 ` Neil Brown
2015-10-23 5:54 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Neil Brown
2015-10-24 10:28 ` Grant Likely
2015-10-24 10:28 ` Grant Likely
2015-10-24 10:28 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Grant Likely
2015-10-24 15:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-10-24 15:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-10-24 15:39 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-10-24 15:58 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board] " John W. Linville
2015-10-24 15:58 ` [Tech-board] [Ksummit-discuss] " John W. Linville
2015-10-24 15:58 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " John W. Linville
2015-10-25 3:45 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board] " Jonathan Corbet
2015-10-25 3:45 ` [Tech-board] [Ksummit-discuss] " Jonathan Corbet
2015-10-25 3:45 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Jonathan Corbet
2015-10-25 7:35 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board] " Grant Likely
2015-10-25 7:35 ` [Tech-board] [Ksummit-discuss] " Grant Likely
2015-10-25 7:35 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Grant Likely
2015-10-24 16:51 ` Dan Williams
2015-10-24 16:51 ` Dan Williams
2015-10-24 16:51 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Dan Williams
2015-10-24 17:37 ` Olof Johansson
2015-10-24 17:37 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Olof Johansson
2015-10-26 1:06 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Darren Hart
2015-10-26 1:06 ` Darren Hart
2015-10-26 1:06 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Darren Hart
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-07-15 21:48 James Bottomley
2014-08-18 20:13 ` James Bottomley
2014-08-19 19:03 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] " James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151023045131.GD9769@x \
--to=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=glikely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=kaccardi@gmail.com \
--cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lwn@lwn.net \
--cc=tech-board-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tech-board@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.