All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
To: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@gmail.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] mtd: ofpart: document the lock flag.
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 18:47:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151027014705.GO13239@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151011200412.GF3696@localhost>

On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 01:04:12PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 03:34:08PM -0000, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > The lock flag of ofpart is undocumented. Add to binding doc.
> 
> Good catch. There are a lot of small corners of very old code that never
> really got reviewed properly, I expect...
> 
> (And the flag looks very odd. Why exactly is it in the partitions?)
> 
> And now that I'm looking further...does this flag even *do* anything?
> AFAICT, it doesn't set the master device flags -- only the partition
> flags. But MTD drivers currently never see the partition flags -- they
> only see the master struct mtd_info. I think the only way anyone could
> observe the effect of this flag is to read the MTD flags from sysfs. And
> that's pretty useless.
> 
> If my understanding is correct, then I'd rather completely remove the
> code that "handles" this flag, rather than codify it in the docs.

I've tested and confirmed: this only sets the flags for the partition
(*NOT* for the master device), so the only visible effect of this
property is to change sysfs flags. I'll send out a patch to kill this
property entirely.

Brian

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Michal Suchanek <hramrach-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	Ian Campbell
	<ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org>,
	Kumar Gala <galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>,
	devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-mtd-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] mtd: ofpart: document the lock flag.
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 18:47:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151027014705.GO13239@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151011200412.GF3696@localhost>

On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 01:04:12PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 03:34:08PM -0000, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > The lock flag of ofpart is undocumented. Add to binding doc.
> 
> Good catch. There are a lot of small corners of very old code that never
> really got reviewed properly, I expect...
> 
> (And the flag looks very odd. Why exactly is it in the partitions?)
> 
> And now that I'm looking further...does this flag even *do* anything?
> AFAICT, it doesn't set the master device flags -- only the partition
> flags. But MTD drivers currently never see the partition flags -- they
> only see the master struct mtd_info. I think the only way anyone could
> observe the effect of this flag is to read the MTD flags from sysfs. And
> that's pretty useless.
> 
> If my understanding is correct, then I'd rather completely remove the
> code that "handles" this flag, rather than codify it in the docs.

I've tested and confirmed: this only sets the flags for the partition
(*NOT* for the master device), so the only visible effect of this
property is to change sysfs flags. I'll send out a patch to kill this
property entirely.

Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-27  1:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-18 15:34 [PATCH v3 0/5] improve mtdpart robustness Michal Suchanek
2015-08-18 15:34 ` Michal Suchanek
2015-08-18 15:34 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] mtd: mtdpart: add debug prints to partition parser Michal Suchanek
2015-08-18 15:34   ` Michal Suchanek
2015-10-11 20:00   ` Brian Norris
2015-08-18 15:34 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] mtd: mtdpart: Do not fail mtd probe when parsing partitions fails Michal Suchanek
2015-08-18 15:34   ` Michal Suchanek
2015-10-11 20:03   ` Brian Norris
2015-10-11 20:03     ` Brian Norris
2015-10-27  1:44     ` Brian Norris
2015-08-18 15:34 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] mtd: ofpart: update devicetree binding specification Michal Suchanek
2015-08-18 15:34   ` Michal Suchanek
2015-10-11 20:04   ` Brian Norris
2015-10-11 20:04     ` Brian Norris
2015-10-27  2:01     ` Brian Norris
2015-10-27  2:01       ` Brian Norris
2015-10-27  4:35     ` Rob Herring
2015-10-27  4:35       ` Rob Herring
2015-10-27 22:50       ` Brian Norris
2015-10-27 22:50         ` Brian Norris
2015-10-28  0:45         ` Rob Herring
2015-08-18 15:34 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] mtd: ofpart: document the lock flag Michal Suchanek
2015-08-18 15:34   ` Michal Suchanek
2015-10-11 20:04   ` Brian Norris
2015-10-27  1:47     ` Brian Norris [this message]
2015-10-27  1:47       ` Brian Norris
2015-08-18 15:34 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] mtd: ofpart: move ofpart partitions to a dedicated dt node Michal Suchanek
2015-08-18 15:34   ` Michal Suchanek
2015-10-31  0:21   ` Brian Norris
2015-10-31  0:21     ` Brian Norris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151027014705.GO13239@google.com \
    --to=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=hramrach@gmail.com \
    --cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.