From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: SWP emulation: Restore original *data when failed
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:44:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151027154424.GG1689@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151016103729.GA6613@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:37:29AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 08:52:24AM +0100, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> > > On 15/10/15 14:02, Will Deacon wrote:
> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
> > >> index bcee7abac68e..6039d1eb5912 100644
> > >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
> > >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
> > >> @@ -284,12 +284,12 @@ static void register_insn_emulation_sysctl(struct ctl_table *table)
> > >> __asm__ __volatile__( \
> > >> ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_PAN(0), ARM64_HAS_PAN, \
> > >> CONFIG_ARM64_PAN) \
> > >> - " mov %w2, %w1\n" \
> > >> - "0: ldxr"B" %w1, [%3]\n" \
> > >> - "1: stxr"B" %w0, %w2, [%3]\n" \
> > >> + "0: ldxr"B" %w2, [%3]\n" \
> > >> + "1: stxr"B" %w0, %w1, [%3]\n" \
> > >> " cbz %w0, 2f\n" \
> > >> " mov %w0, %w4\n" \
> > >> "2:\n" \
> > >> + " mov %w1, %w2\n" \
> > >> " .pushsection .fixup,\"ax\"\n" \
> > >> " .align 2\n" \
> > >> "3: mov %w0, %w5\n" \
> >
> > On the second thought looks like we still update *data in case stxr
> > fails (or I need more coffee).
>
> I'm on the second cup and I see the same problem. Even if stxr fails, we
> fall back through "mov %w1, %w2", so *data is always updated with the
> loaded value. Maybe something like below on top of Will's patch:
Yeah, sorry, my original patch was an untested mess. I think we can avoid
the "cc" clobber by adding a branch to the slow-path, as below.
Still needs testing, mind.
Will
--->8
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
index 6039d1eb5912..937f5e58a4d3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
@@ -288,17 +288,19 @@ static void register_insn_emulation_sysctl(struct ctl_table *table)
"1: stxr"B" %w0, %w1, [%3]\n" \
" cbz %w0, 2f\n" \
" mov %w0, %w4\n" \
+ " b 3f\n" \
"2:\n" \
" mov %w1, %w2\n" \
+ "3:\n" \
" .pushsection .fixup,\"ax\"\n" \
" .align 2\n" \
- "3: mov %w0, %w5\n" \
- " b 2b\n" \
+ "4: mov %w0, %w5\n" \
+ " b 3b\n" \
" .popsection" \
" .pushsection __ex_table,\"a\"\n" \
" .align 3\n" \
- " .quad 0b, 3b\n" \
- " .quad 1b, 3b\n" \
+ " .quad 0b, 4b\n" \
+ " .quad 1b, 4b\n" \
" .popsection\n" \
ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_PAN(1), ARM64_HAS_PAN, \
CONFIG_ARM64_PAN) \
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>,
Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@freescale.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Punit Agrawal <Punit.Agrawal@arm.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"nico@linaro.org" <nico@linaro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: SWP emulation: Restore original *data when failed
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:44:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151027154424.GG1689@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151016103729.GA6613@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:37:29AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 08:52:24AM +0100, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> > > On 15/10/15 14:02, Will Deacon wrote:
> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
> > >> index bcee7abac68e..6039d1eb5912 100644
> > >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
> > >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
> > >> @@ -284,12 +284,12 @@ static void register_insn_emulation_sysctl(struct ctl_table *table)
> > >> __asm__ __volatile__( \
> > >> ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_PAN(0), ARM64_HAS_PAN, \
> > >> CONFIG_ARM64_PAN) \
> > >> - " mov %w2, %w1\n" \
> > >> - "0: ldxr"B" %w1, [%3]\n" \
> > >> - "1: stxr"B" %w0, %w2, [%3]\n" \
> > >> + "0: ldxr"B" %w2, [%3]\n" \
> > >> + "1: stxr"B" %w0, %w1, [%3]\n" \
> > >> " cbz %w0, 2f\n" \
> > >> " mov %w0, %w4\n" \
> > >> "2:\n" \
> > >> + " mov %w1, %w2\n" \
> > >> " .pushsection .fixup,\"ax\"\n" \
> > >> " .align 2\n" \
> > >> "3: mov %w0, %w5\n" \
> >
> > On the second thought looks like we still update *data in case stxr
> > fails (or I need more coffee).
>
> I'm on the second cup and I see the same problem. Even if stxr fails, we
> fall back through "mov %w1, %w2", so *data is always updated with the
> loaded value. Maybe something like below on top of Will's patch:
Yeah, sorry, my original patch was an untested mess. I think we can avoid
the "cc" clobber by adding a branch to the slow-path, as below.
Still needs testing, mind.
Will
--->8
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
index 6039d1eb5912..937f5e58a4d3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
@@ -288,17 +288,19 @@ static void register_insn_emulation_sysctl(struct ctl_table *table)
"1: stxr"B" %w0, %w1, [%3]\n" \
" cbz %w0, 2f\n" \
" mov %w0, %w4\n" \
+ " b 3f\n" \
"2:\n" \
" mov %w1, %w2\n" \
+ "3:\n" \
" .pushsection .fixup,\"ax\"\n" \
" .align 2\n" \
- "3: mov %w0, %w5\n" \
- " b 2b\n" \
+ "4: mov %w0, %w5\n" \
+ " b 3b\n" \
" .popsection" \
" .pushsection __ex_table,\"a\"\n" \
" .align 3\n" \
- " .quad 0b, 3b\n" \
- " .quad 1b, 3b\n" \
+ " .quad 0b, 4b\n" \
+ " .quad 1b, 4b\n" \
" .popsection\n" \
ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_PAN(1), ARM64_HAS_PAN, \
CONFIG_ARM64_PAN) \
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-27 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-14 2:51 [PATCH] ARM: SWP emulation: Restore original *data when failed Shengjiu Wang
2015-10-14 2:51 ` Shengjiu Wang
2015-10-15 8:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-15 8:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-15 8:36 ` Shengjiu Wang
2015-10-15 8:36 ` Shengjiu Wang
2015-10-15 8:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-15 8:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-15 9:17 ` Vladimir Murzin
2015-10-15 9:17 ` Vladimir Murzin
2015-10-15 13:02 ` Will Deacon
2015-10-15 13:02 ` Will Deacon
2015-10-15 13:25 ` Vladimir Murzin
2015-10-15 13:25 ` Vladimir Murzin
2015-10-16 7:52 ` Vladimir Murzin
2015-10-16 7:52 ` Vladimir Murzin
2015-10-16 10:37 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-10-16 10:37 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-10-27 15:44 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2015-10-27 15:44 ` Will Deacon
2015-10-28 16:16 ` Will Deacon
2015-10-28 16:16 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151027154424.GG1689@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.