All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: hch@lst.de
Cc: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, hare@suse.de, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: IBM request to allow unprivledged ioctls [Was: Revert "dm mpath: fix stalls when handling invalid ioctls"]
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 14:36:50 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151031183650.GA3546@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151031181312.GA11587@redhat.com>

On Sat, Oct 31 2015 at  2:13P -0400,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 31 2015 at 11:33am -0400,
> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > 
> > On 29/10/2015 14:18, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > > > 4) dmesg shows that scsi_verify_blk_ioctl() failed for SG_IO (0x2285);
> > > >    it returns -ENOIOCTLCMD, later replaced with -ENOTTY in vfs_ioctl().
> > > > 
> > > >     $ dmesg
> > > >     <...>
> > > >     [] device-mapper: multipath: Failing path 65:144.
> > > >     [] device-mapper: multipath: Failing path 67:144.
> > > >     [] device-mapper: multipath: Failing path 65:224.
> > > >     [] device-mapper: multipath: Failing path 68:32.
> > > >     [] sgio_inquiry: sending ioctl 2285 to a partition!
> > > 
> > > So scsi_verify_blk_ioctl() considers the ioctl invalid.
> > 
> > But that's wrong, I think.  It's a false positive in
> > scsi_verify_blk_ioctl().
> > 
> > If the ioctl is valid when bdev becomes non-NULL (and it will be if
> > ti->len becomes equal to i_size_read(bdev->bd_inode) >> SECTOR_SHIFT),
> > you should not return -ENOIOCTLCMD aka ENOTTY, because userspace doesn't
> > think the ioctls can go away and come back.  So Hannes's patch broke the
> > userspace ABI. :(
> 
> Huh?  All that Hannes' patch did was add early verification of the ioctl
> if there are no paths, since: there is no point queueing an ioctl that
> is invalid.
> 
> But looking just now, Christoph's recent ioctl refactoring that I staged
> for 4.4 does seem to subtley revert Hannes' change:
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/commit/?h=dm-4.4&id=40cf639be1db8cc2b8183fe2ccd390ca77b90396
> With hch's change multipath_prepare_ioctl() will _not_ do early
> verification of the ioctl if no paths are available (and
> queue_if_no_path is configured).  Because the call to
> scsi_verify_blk_ioctl() was moved to dm_blk_ioctl() and is only called
> if the return is > 0 (again -ENOTCONN is being returned).
> 
> Not to mention hch's lifting of scsi_verify_blk_ioctl() into DM core's
> dm_blk_ioctl() -- likely motivated by not requiring all targets to do
> the call like they were doing -- should really be done as part of the
> new DM target .prepare_ioctl hook.
> 
> Christoph, I think your DM ioctl changes need more review/work.. which
> implies they'll very likely miss 4.4.. sorry.

This patch will maintain Hannes' commit a1989b3300935 (which I think is
correct!):

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
index aaa6caa..ffea28f 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
@@ -1562,6 +1562,16 @@ static int multipath_prepare_ioctl(struct dm_target *ti,
 
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->lock, flags);
 
+	/*
+	 * Only pass ioctls through if the device sizes match exactly.
+	 */
+	if (!*bdev || ti->len != i_size_read((*bdev)->bd_inode) >> SECTOR_SHIFT) {
+		/* not deferring to DM core to verify the ioctl */
+		int err = scsi_verify_blk_ioctl(NULL, cmd);
+		if (err)
+			r = err;
+	}
+
 	if (r == -ENOTCONN && !fatal_signal_pending(current)) {
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&m->lock, flags);
 		if (!m->current_pg) {
@@ -1574,11 +1584,6 @@ static int multipath_prepare_ioctl(struct dm_target *ti,
 		dm_table_run_md_queue_async(m->ti->table);
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * Only pass ioctls through if the device sizes match exactly.
-	 */
-	if (!r && ti->len != i_size_read((*bdev)->bd_inode) >> SECTOR_SHIFT)
-		return 1;
 	return r;
 }
 
Christoph, I've folded this into your original commit 40cf639be1d I
referenced above, new commit is here:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/commit/?h=dm-4.4&id=21a2807bc3ff0eec3e2ec35357a4c37d4bcbfd5b

But if you, Hannes or others disagree with this change I'll drop it for
4.4 and we'll have to revisit this later.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-31 18:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-29 12:24 [PATCH] Revert "dm mpath: fix stalls when handling invalid ioctls" Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2015-10-29 12:33 ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2015-10-29 13:18 ` IBM request to allow unprivledged ioctls [Was: Revert "dm mpath: fix stalls when handling invalid ioctls"] Mike Snitzer
2015-10-29 14:47   ` [dm-devel] " Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2015-10-31 15:33   ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-31 18:13     ` Mike Snitzer
2015-10-31 18:36       ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2015-10-31 19:07       ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-31 22:47         ` Mike Snitzer
2015-11-02  7:28           ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-11-02  9:57             ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-02 13:31             ` Mike Snitzer
2015-11-02 13:56               ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-11-02 14:12                 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-11-02 14:36                   ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-11-02 15:14                     ` Mike Snitzer
2015-11-02 15:29                       ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-11-02 14:52                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-02 15:05                   ` Mike Snitzer
2015-11-02 15:45                     ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-02 15:49                       ` Mike Snitzer
2015-11-02 15:32                   ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-11-02  9:55           ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151031183650.GA3546@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.