Re: [PATCH] perf report: Support caller callchain order when using DWARF unwinder.

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>]

Em Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 11:28:37AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 01:54:58PM +0100, Milian Wolff escreveu:
> > On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 9:06:31 AM CET Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 08:33:25AM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 06:19:44PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > > > So, you tried this patch, right? Jiri, have you submitted this in some
> > > > > other message I missed?
> > > > 
> > > > nope.. I thought Milian would take it ;-)
> > > 
> > > I can take it, as soon as you guys agree its something I should :-)
> > 
> > Yes, I think it's good as-is. Should I resubmit Jiris patch? Considering that 
> > he rewrote the patch, should he send it and add me as tester? How do you 
> > handle such situations in the Kernel land?
> 
> So, I'll fix this all up by adding a Signed-off-by: Jiri and a

I take that back, can one of you please write a nice description to the
problem and how the proposed patch fixes it, then send as a separate
message with your Tested-by + Signed-off-by?

- Arnaldo

> Tested-by: Millian, which I think I can do according to the above
> messages and past experience, but the Correct Way to do this would
> be for Jiri to collect your Tested-by and resubmit in a separate
> message, not as a patch added to the text of a thread.