From: tj@kernel.org (Tejun Heo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 1/3] percpu: remove PERCPU_ENOUGH_ROOM which is stale definition
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 17:07:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151103220701.GC5749@mtj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <36E66A14-F5AE-45DA-A759-82F1BA5DFE98@gmail.com>
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 11:12:51PM +0900, Jungseok Lee wrote:
> On Nov 3, 2015, at 4:10 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> Dear Tejun,
>
> > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 07:46:15AM +0000, Jungseok Lee wrote:
> >> As pure cleanup, this patch removes PERCPU_ENOUGH_ROOM which is not
> >> used any more. That is, no code refers to the definition.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jungseok Lee <jungseoklee85@gmail.com>
> >
> > Applied to percpu/for-4.4.
>
> Thanks for taking care of this!
Can you please refresh the patch so that it also drops
PERCPU_ENOUGH_ROOM definition from ia64?
Thanks.
--
tejun
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Jungseok Lee <jungseoklee85@gmail.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, cl@linux.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
james.morse@arm.com, takahiro.akashi@linaro.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, barami97@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] percpu: remove PERCPU_ENOUGH_ROOM which is stale definition
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 17:07:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151103220701.GC5749@mtj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <36E66A14-F5AE-45DA-A759-82F1BA5DFE98@gmail.com>
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 11:12:51PM +0900, Jungseok Lee wrote:
> On Nov 3, 2015, at 4:10 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> Dear Tejun,
>
> > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 07:46:15AM +0000, Jungseok Lee wrote:
> >> As pure cleanup, this patch removes PERCPU_ENOUGH_ROOM which is not
> >> used any more. That is, no code refers to the definition.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jungseok Lee <jungseoklee85@gmail.com>
> >
> > Applied to percpu/for-4.4.
>
> Thanks for taking care of this!
Can you please refresh the patch so that it also drops
PERCPU_ENOUGH_ROOM definition from ia64?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Jungseok Lee <jungseoklee85@gmail.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, cl@linux.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
james.morse@arm.com, takahiro.akashi@linaro.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, barami97@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] percpu: remove PERCPU_ENOUGH_ROOM which is stale definition
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 17:07:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151103220701.GC5749@mtj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <36E66A14-F5AE-45DA-A759-82F1BA5DFE98@gmail.com>
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 11:12:51PM +0900, Jungseok Lee wrote:
> On Nov 3, 2015, at 4:10 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> Dear Tejun,
>
> > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 07:46:15AM +0000, Jungseok Lee wrote:
> >> As pure cleanup, this patch removes PERCPU_ENOUGH_ROOM which is not
> >> used any more. That is, no code refers to the definition.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jungseok Lee <jungseoklee85@gmail.com>
> >
> > Applied to percpu/for-4.4.
>
> Thanks for taking care of this!
Can you please refresh the patch so that it also drops
PERCPU_ENOUGH_ROOM definition from ia64?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-03 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-01 7:46 [PATCH v6 0/3] Introduce IRQ stack on arm64 with percpu changes Jungseok Lee
2015-11-01 7:46 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-11-01 7:46 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-11-01 7:46 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] percpu: remove PERCPU_ENOUGH_ROOM which is stale definition Jungseok Lee
2015-11-01 7:46 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-11-01 7:46 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-11-02 16:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-02 16:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-02 16:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-02 19:10 ` Tejun Heo
2015-11-02 19:10 ` Tejun Heo
2015-11-02 19:10 ` Tejun Heo
2015-11-03 14:12 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-11-03 14:12 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-11-03 14:12 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-11-03 22:07 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2015-11-03 22:07 ` Tejun Heo
2015-11-03 22:07 ` Tejun Heo
2015-11-04 13:19 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-11-04 13:19 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-11-04 13:19 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-11-01 7:46 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] percpu: add PERCPU_ATOM_SIZE for a generic percpu area setup Jungseok Lee
2015-11-01 7:46 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-11-01 7:46 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-11-02 16:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-02 16:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-02 16:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-02 16:22 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-02 16:22 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-02 16:22 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-02 16:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-02 16:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-02 16:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-02 17:35 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-02 17:35 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-02 17:35 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-02 18:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-02 18:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-02 18:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-02 18:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-02 18:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-02 18:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-03 13:49 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-11-03 13:49 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-11-03 13:49 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-11-03 17:58 ` James Morse
2015-11-03 17:58 ` James Morse
2015-11-03 17:58 ` James Morse
2015-11-04 13:35 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-11-04 13:35 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-11-04 13:35 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-11-03 14:11 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-11-03 14:11 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-11-03 14:11 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-11-01 7:46 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] arm64: Introduce IRQ stack Jungseok Lee
2015-11-01 7:46 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-11-01 7:46 ` Jungseok Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151103220701.GC5749@mtj.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.