From: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.net>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
Cc: btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Subject: Re: Ideas for btrfs-convert fix(or rework)
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:08:55 +0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151110140855.3ae7297c@natsu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5641A7DA.6010102@gmx.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3202 bytes --]
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:16:26 +0800
Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com> wrote:
> So if things are correct, the btrfs you converted should still be in
> mixed-bg mode.
> A recent 'btrfs fi df' command should show things like:
> Data+Metadata, DUP: total=512.00MiB, used=68.23MiB
Actually not quite. After all the rebalancing, I currently have:
Data, single: total=8.37TiB, used=7.50TiB
System, DUP: total=32.00MiB, used=592.00KiB
Metadata, DUP: total=8.00GiB, used=6.42GiB
GlobalReserve, single: total=512.00MiB, used=0.00B
> > But as we know recently there were reports that it now causes corruption or
> > does not work. So I wonder what happened that broke it, and is there really no
> > simpler fix? Even if requiring the user to balance to get rid of the bloated
> > Metadata like I had to.
> >
>
> Yes, current btrfs-convert has problem on marking chunk meta or data.
> Resulting some data extents may lay in metadata chunk, and vice verse.
> At least it won't pass latest btrfsck.
>
> In that incorrect chunk layout, I'm not surprised any thing go wrong.
Made an experiment:
# dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=1 seek=100000 of=100G
1+0 records in
1+0 records out
1048576 bytes (1.0 MB) copied, 0.0023896 s, 439 MB/s
# losetup /dev/loop7 100G
# mkfs.ext4 /dev/loop7
// Success
# mount /dev/loop7 /mnt/tmp1/
// Copy some files there
# df -h /mnt/tmp1/
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/loop7 96G 2.6G 89G 3% /mnt/tmp1
# umount /mnt/tmp1/
# btrfs-convert -d /dev/loop7
creating btrfs metadata.
creating ext2fs image file.
cleaning up system chunk.
conversion complete.
# mount /dev/loop7 /mnt/tmp1/
# btrfs fi df /mnt/tmp1/
Data, single: total=65.00GiB, used=1.32GiB
System, single: total=32.00MiB, used=12.00KiB
Metadata, single: total=32.63GiB, used=2.91GiB
GlobalReserve, single: total=92.00MiB, used=0.00B
# btrfs sub del /mnt/tmp1/ext2_saved
Transaction commit: none (default)
Delete subvolume '/mnt/tmp1/ext2_saved'
# btrfs fi df /mnt/tmp1/
Data, single: total=10.00GiB, used=120.12MiB
System, single: total=32.00MiB, used=4.00KiB
Metadata, single: total=4.00GiB, used=2.37GiB
GlobalReserve, single: total=52.00MiB, used=0.00B
// It has 2.6 GB of files, and most of them are now accounted as "Metadata".
# btrfs fi balance start -m /mnt/tmp1/
Done, had to relocate 5 out of 7 chunks
// They are now reclassified as data:
# btrfs fi df /mnt/tmp1/
Data, single: total=10.00GiB, used=2.49GiB
System, single: total=32.00MiB, used=4.00KiB
Metadata, single: total=1.00GiB, used=468.00KiB
GlobalReserve, single: total=4.00MiB, used=0.00B
// Unmount, mount, checked all files integrity with 'cfv', all files are
present and there is no corruption.
So this behaves just like I remember it to, after conversion at first a large
part of the data will show up as Metadata, but a balance fixes that. And most
importantly no corruption issues. Maybe it's just because this is only a small
test FS, but my production one earlier went through the same process without
problems as well.
Using btrfs-tools v3.17 and kernel 3.18.21
--
With respect,
Roman
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-10 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-10 6:27 Ideas for btrfs-convert fix(or rework) Qu Wenruo
2015-11-10 7:55 ` Roman Mamedov
2015-11-10 8:16 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-11-10 9:08 ` Roman Mamedov [this message]
2015-11-10 9:18 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-11-10 10:31 ` Duncan
2015-11-12 10:23 ` Vytautas D
2015-11-12 13:27 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-11-12 14:09 ` Roman Mamedov
2015-11-12 14:38 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-11-13 6:41 ` Duncan
2015-11-16 17:46 ` David Sterba
2015-11-17 0:42 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151110140855.3ae7297c@natsu \
--to=rm@romanrm.net \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.