All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.net>
Cc: btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Subject: Re: Ideas for btrfs-convert fix(or rework)
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:18:02 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5641B64A.9020606@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151110140855.3ae7297c@natsu>



Roman Mamedov wrote on 2015/11/10 14:08 +0500:
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:16:26 +0800
> Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com> wrote:
>
>> So if things are correct, the btrfs you converted should still be in
>> mixed-bg mode.
>> A recent 'btrfs fi df' command should show things like:
>> Data+Metadata, DUP: total=512.00MiB, used=68.23MiB
>
> Actually not quite. After all the rebalancing, I currently have:
>
> Data, single: total=8.37TiB, used=7.50TiB
> System, DUP: total=32.00MiB, used=592.00KiB
> Metadata, DUP: total=8.00GiB, used=6.42GiB
> GlobalReserve, single: total=512.00MiB, used=0.00B
>
>>> But as we know recently there were reports that it now causes corruption or
>>> does not work. So I wonder what happened that broke it, and is there really no
>>> simpler fix? Even if requiring the user to balance to get rid of the bloated
>>> Metadata like I had to.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, current btrfs-convert has problem on marking chunk meta or data.
>> Resulting some data extents may lay in metadata chunk, and vice verse.
>> At least it won't pass latest btrfsck.
>>
>> In that incorrect chunk layout, I'm not surprised any thing go wrong.
>
> Made an experiment:
>
> # dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=1 seek=100000 of=100G
> 1+0 records in
> 1+0 records out
> 1048576 bytes (1.0 MB) copied, 0.0023896 s, 439 MB/s
>
> # losetup /dev/loop7 100G
>
> # mkfs.ext4 /dev/loop7
>
> // Success
>
> # mount /dev/loop7 /mnt/tmp1/
>
> // Copy some files there
>
> # df -h /mnt/tmp1/
> Filesystem      Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/loop7       96G  2.6G   89G   3% /mnt/tmp1
>
> # umount /mnt/tmp1/
>
> # btrfs-convert -d /dev/loop7
> creating btrfs metadata.
> creating ext2fs image file.
> cleaning up system chunk.
> conversion complete.

Here call 'btrfsck' from *latest* btrfs-progs.
You'll see tons of error, showing problems including:
1) stripes cross map boundary
    This will lead to kernel BUG_ON() when scrubbing.

2) Data extents in metadata chunks
    The problem causing the metadata accounting goes crazy.

>
> # mount /dev/loop7 /mnt/tmp1/
>
> # btrfs fi df /mnt/tmp1/
> Data, single: total=65.00GiB, used=1.32GiB
> System, single: total=32.00MiB, used=12.00KiB
> Metadata, single: total=32.63GiB, used=2.91GiB
> GlobalReserve, single: total=92.00MiB, used=0.00B
>

And your btrfs-convert is already broken, with wrong chunk allocation.

> # btrfs sub del /mnt/tmp1/ext2_saved
> Transaction commit: none (default)
> Delete subvolume '/mnt/tmp1/ext2_saved'
>
> # btrfs fi df /mnt/tmp1/
> Data, single: total=10.00GiB, used=120.12MiB
> System, single: total=32.00MiB, used=4.00KiB
> Metadata, single: total=4.00GiB, used=2.37GiB
> GlobalReserve, single: total=52.00MiB, used=0.00B
>
> // It has 2.6 GB of files, and most of them are now accounted as "Metadata".
>
> # btrfs fi balance start -m /mnt/tmp1/
> Done, had to relocate 5 out of 7 chunks
>
> // They are now reclassified as data:
>
> # btrfs fi df /mnt/tmp1/
> Data, single: total=10.00GiB, used=2.49GiB
> System, single: total=32.00MiB, used=4.00KiB
> Metadata, single: total=1.00GiB, used=468.00KiB
> GlobalReserve, single: total=4.00MiB, used=0.00B
>
> // Unmount, mount, checked all files integrity with 'cfv', all files are
> present and there is no corruption.
>
> So this behaves just like I remember it to, after conversion at first a large
> part of the data will show up as Metadata, but a balance fixes that. And most
> importantly no corruption issues. Maybe it's just because this is only a small
> test FS, but my production one earlier went through the same process without
> problems as well.

Yes, some problem can be fixed by such balance, as after balance, data 
and metadata will be relocated to correct new chunks.

But there may be a lot of hidden bugs here.
And we can't ignore such malfunction just because it's OK under some 
cases, or btrfs won't really become a production ready filesystem.

Thanks,
Qu

>
> Using btrfs-tools v3.17 and kernel 3.18.21
>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-10  9:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-10  6:27 Ideas for btrfs-convert fix(or rework) Qu Wenruo
2015-11-10  7:55 ` Roman Mamedov
2015-11-10  8:16   ` Qu Wenruo
2015-11-10  9:08     ` Roman Mamedov
2015-11-10  9:18       ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2015-11-10 10:31         ` Duncan
2015-11-12 10:23           ` Vytautas D
2015-11-12 13:27             ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-11-12 14:09               ` Roman Mamedov
2015-11-12 14:38                 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-11-13  6:41                   ` Duncan
2015-11-16 17:46 ` David Sterba
2015-11-17  0:42   ` Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5641B64A.9020606@gmx.com \
    --to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rm@romanrm.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.