All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>,
	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@gmail.com>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Subject: Re: fs: out of bounds on stack in iov_iter_advance
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:19:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151111101948.GL22011@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151111191636.17e4ac62@canb.auug.org.au>

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 07:16:36PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Al,
> 
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 07:43:30 +0000 Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > dax_io fix isn't there, neither is overlayfs magic.h patch - both are
> > already in other trees.  I would like to get xattr series in as well,
> > but that's a separate pull request, if you'd accept them in this window in
> > the first place.  richacl stuff isn't there as well, and I think that one
> > is clear "leave it for 4.5" fodder.
> 
> So could you please remove the 4.5 stuff from your for-next branch
> until after the merge window closes.

Done.

> Also, I noticed these new warnings today:
> 
> fs/orangefs/xattr.c:509:9: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
>   .get = pvfs2_xattr_get_trusted,
>          ^
> fs/orangefs/xattr.c:509:9: note: (near initialization for 'pvfs2_xattr_trusted_handler.get')
> fs/orangefs/xattr.c:510:9: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
>   .set = pvfs2_xattr_set_trusted,
>          ^
> fs/orangefs/xattr.c:510:9: note: (near initialization for 'pvfs2_xattr_trusted_handler.set')
> fs/orangefs/xattr.c:520:9: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
>   .get = pvfs2_xattr_get_default,
>          ^
> fs/orangefs/xattr.c:520:9: note: (near initialization for 'pvfs2_xattr_default_handler.get')
> fs/orangefs/xattr.c:521:9: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
>   .set = pvfs2_xattr_set_default,
>          ^
> fs/orangefs/xattr.c:521:9: note: (near initialization for 'pvfs2_xattr_default_handler.set')

That's "xattr handlers: Pass handler to operations instead of flags" fallout,
trivially adjusted (typical change is
-ext2_xattr_security_list(struct dentry *dentry, char *list, size_t list_size,
-                        const char *name, size_t name_len, int type)
+ext2_xattr_security_list(const struct xattr_handler *handler,
+                        struct dentry *dentry, char *list, size_t list_size,
+                        const char *name, size_t name_len)
with type replaced with handler->flags if it's used anywhere in the body;
AFAICS, none of orangefs instances use it at all, so it's just a matter of
changing the argument lists in pvfs2_xattr_[gs]et_{default,trusted},
adding const struct xattr_handler *handler in the beginning and removing
the last argument; callers in pvfs2_ioctl() should simply use
pvfs2_inode_[gs]etxattr()).

Note, however, that orangefs in linux-next lacks a lot of fixes (see
vfs.git#orangefs-untested for some; AFAICS, those are missing from all
branches in orangefs git tree) and there are problems I don't know
how to fix, mostly due to the lack of documentation.  The last I've
heard from them was that they were putting such docs together; hopefully
once that get done we'll be able to sort the rest of that thing out.
It'll be after -rc1, though.

So xattr conflicts are the least of the problems there; those are easy
to adjust for, there are more serious issues in the entire thing ;-/
BTW, while we are at it - pvfs2_listxattr() doesn't even validate
resp.listxattr.returned_count, so a bogus response from buggered
server will do really interesting things to the kernel.

I'll cook the minimal fixup for API change after I get some sleep and
send it your way, unless somebody gets there first...

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-11 10:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-12 14:13 fs: out of bounds on stack in iov_iter_advance Sasha Levin
2015-08-15 20:13 ` Chuck Ebbert
2015-08-17  9:18   ` Andrey Ryabinin
2015-08-19  5:46     ` Al Viro
2015-09-02 20:00       ` Sasha Levin
2015-09-18  2:24       ` Sasha Levin
2015-09-30 21:30         ` Sasha Levin
2015-10-17 19:22           ` Sasha Levin
2015-10-18  4:17             ` Ross Zwisler
2015-10-19 23:34               ` Sasha Levin
2015-11-06  1:34           ` Al Viro
2015-11-06  2:19             ` Al Viro
2015-11-06  3:38               ` Linus Torvalds
2015-11-06 16:06                 ` Jens Axboe
2015-11-11  2:21                 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-11-11  2:25                   ` Jens Axboe
2015-11-11  2:31                     ` Linus Torvalds
2015-11-11  2:40                       ` Jens Axboe
2015-11-11  2:41                         ` Jens Axboe
2015-11-11  2:44                           ` Jens Axboe
2015-11-11  3:06                             ` Al Viro
2015-11-11  3:07                               ` Jens Axboe
2015-11-11  3:20                       ` Sasha Levin
2015-11-11  2:56                   ` Al Viro
2015-11-11  3:30                     ` Al Viro
2015-11-11  4:36                       ` Linus Torvalds
2015-11-11  7:43                         ` Al Viro
2015-11-11  8:16                           ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-11-11 10:19                             ` Al Viro [this message]
2015-11-11 10:28                               ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-11-11 16:25                                 ` Mike Marshall
2015-11-11 16:36                                   ` Al Viro
2015-11-11 16:56                                     ` Mike Marshall
2015-11-11 16:33                               ` Al Viro
2015-11-11 21:47                                 ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151111101948.GL22011@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cebbert.lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
    --cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=willy@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.