From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
willy@linux.intel.com
Cc: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@gmail.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: fs: out of bounds on stack in iov_iter_advance
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:30:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <560C5469.5010704@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55FB75D0.7060403@oracle.com>
On 09/17/2015 10:24 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 08/19/2015 01:46 AM, Al Viro wrote:
>>> or mapping->a_ops->direct_IO() returned more
>>>> than 'count'.
>> Was there DAX involved? ->direct_IO() in there is blkdev_direct_IO(),
>> which takes rather different paths in those cases...
>>
>
> So I've traced this all the way back to dax_io(). I can trigger this with:
>
> diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
> index 93bf2f9..2cdb8a5 100644
> --- a/fs/dax.c
> +++ b/fs/dax.c
> @@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ static ssize_t dax_io(struct inode *inode, struct iov_iter *iter,
> if (need_wmb)
> wmb_pmem();
>
> + WARN_ON((pos == start) && (pos - start > iov_iter_count(iter)));
> return (pos == start) ? retval : pos - start;
> }
>
> So it seems that iter gets moved twice here: once in dax_io(), and once again
> back at generic_file_read_iter().
>
> I don't see how it ever worked. Am I missing something?
Ping?
Thanks,
Sasha
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-30 21:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-12 14:13 fs: out of bounds on stack in iov_iter_advance Sasha Levin
2015-08-15 20:13 ` Chuck Ebbert
2015-08-17 9:18 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2015-08-19 5:46 ` Al Viro
2015-09-02 20:00 ` Sasha Levin
2015-09-18 2:24 ` Sasha Levin
2015-09-30 21:30 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2015-10-17 19:22 ` Sasha Levin
2015-10-18 4:17 ` Ross Zwisler
2015-10-19 23:34 ` Sasha Levin
2015-11-06 1:34 ` Al Viro
2015-11-06 2:19 ` Al Viro
2015-11-06 3:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-11-06 16:06 ` Jens Axboe
2015-11-11 2:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-11-11 2:25 ` Jens Axboe
2015-11-11 2:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-11-11 2:40 ` Jens Axboe
2015-11-11 2:41 ` Jens Axboe
2015-11-11 2:44 ` Jens Axboe
2015-11-11 3:06 ` Al Viro
2015-11-11 3:07 ` Jens Axboe
2015-11-11 3:20 ` Sasha Levin
2015-11-11 2:56 ` Al Viro
2015-11-11 3:30 ` Al Viro
2015-11-11 4:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-11-11 7:43 ` Al Viro
2015-11-11 8:16 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-11-11 10:19 ` Al Viro
2015-11-11 10:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-11-11 16:25 ` Mike Marshall
2015-11-11 16:36 ` Al Viro
2015-11-11 16:56 ` Mike Marshall
2015-11-11 16:33 ` Al Viro
2015-11-11 21:47 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=560C5469.5010704@oracle.com \
--to=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
--cc=cebbert.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.