From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH 2/3] ixgbe: Use __dev_uc_sync and __dev_uc_unsync for unicast addresses
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 17:35:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151111173557.6eb25df5@xeon-e3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151022232636.24612.12045.stgit@ahduyck-vm-fedora22>
On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:26:36 -0700
Alexander Duyck <aduyck@mirantis.com> wrote:
> +static int ixgbe_uc_unsync(struct net_device *netdev, const unsigned char *addr)
> +{
> + struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> +
> + ixgbe_del_mac_filter(adapter, addr, VMDQ_P(0));
> +
> + return 0;
Why add an internal function that always returns 0?
Rather than making it void.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Alexander Duyck <aduyck@mirantis.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 2/3] ixgbe: Use __dev_uc_sync and __dev_uc_unsync for unicast addresses
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 17:35:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151111173557.6eb25df5@xeon-e3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151022232636.24612.12045.stgit@ahduyck-vm-fedora22>
On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:26:36 -0700
Alexander Duyck <aduyck@mirantis.com> wrote:
> +static int ixgbe_uc_unsync(struct net_device *netdev, const unsigned char *addr)
> +{
> + struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> +
> + ixgbe_del_mac_filter(adapter, addr, VMDQ_P(0));
> +
> + return 0;
Why add an internal function that always returns 0?
Rather than making it void.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-12 1:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-22 23:26 [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH 0/3] ixgbe: Fix FDB handling Alexander Duyck
2015-10-22 23:26 ` Alexander Duyck
2015-10-22 23:26 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH 1/3] ixgbe: Refactor MAC address configuration code Alexander Duyck
2015-10-22 23:26 ` Alexander Duyck
2015-11-11 23:34 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Miller, Darin J
2015-11-11 23:34 ` Miller, Darin J
2015-10-22 23:26 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH 2/3] ixgbe: Use __dev_uc_sync and __dev_uc_unsync for unicast addresses Alexander Duyck
2015-10-22 23:26 ` Alexander Duyck
2015-11-04 18:39 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Miller, Darin J
2015-11-04 18:39 ` Miller, Darin J
2015-11-12 1:35 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2015-11-12 1:35 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-11-12 5:21 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Duyck
2015-11-12 5:21 ` Alexander Duyck
2015-10-22 23:26 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH 3/3] ixgbe: Allow FDB entries access to more RAR filters Alexander Duyck
2015-10-22 23:26 ` Alexander Duyck
2015-11-04 18:40 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Miller, Darin J
2015-11-04 18:40 ` Miller, Darin J
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151111173557.6eb25df5@xeon-e3 \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.