All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com>
Cc: <robh+dt@kernel.org>, <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	<mark.rutland@arm.com>, <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	<galak@codeaurora.org>, <michals@xilinx.com>, <sorenb@xilinx.com>,
	<bhelgaas@google.com>, <arnd@arndb.de>, <tinamdar@apm.com>,
	<treding@nvidia.com>, <rjui@broadcom.com>,
	<Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com>, <m-karicheri2@ti.com>,
	<hauke@hauke-m.de>, <dhdang@apm.com>, <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Bharat Kumar Gogada" <bharatku@xilinx.com>,
	Ravi Kiran Gummaluri <rgummal@xilinx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] PCI: Xilinx-NWL-PCIe: Added support for Xilinx NWL PCIe Host Controller
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 17:37:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151111173712.7dde8a42@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447223619-30945-1-git-send-email-bharatku@xilinx.com>

On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 12:03:39 +0530
Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com> wrote:

> Adding PCIe Root Port driver for Xilinx PCIe NWL bridge IP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@xilinx.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ravi Kiran Gummaluri <rgummal@xilinx.com>
> ---
> Added logic to allocate contiguous hwirq in nwl_irq_domain_alloc function.
> Moved MSI functionality to separate functions.
> Changed error return values.
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/pci/xilinx-nwl-pcie.txt    |   68 ++
>  drivers/pci/host/Kconfig                           |   16 +-
>  drivers/pci/host/Makefile                          |    1 +
>  drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c                 | 1062 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 1144 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/xilinx-nwl-pcie.txt
>  create mode 100644 drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..8bc509c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c

[...]

> +static struct msi_domain_info nwl_msi_domain_info = {
> +	.flags = (MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS | MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS |
> +		  MSI_FLAG_MULTI_PCI_MSI),

Given that you claim to support multi-MSI...

[...]

> +static int nwl_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
> +				unsigned int nr_irqs, void *args)
> +{
> +	struct nwl_pcie *pcie = domain->host_data;
> +	struct nwl_msi *msi = &pcie->msi;
> +	unsigned long bit;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&msi->lock);
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++) {
> +		bit = find_first_zero_bit(msi->used, INT_PCI_MSI_NR);
> +		if (bit < INT_PCI_MSI_NR)
> +			set_bit(bit, msi->used);
> +		else
> +			bit = -ENOSPC;
> +
> +		if (bit < 0) {
> +			mutex_unlock(&msi->lock);
> +			return bit;
> +		}
> +
> +		irq_domain_set_info(domain, virq, bit, &nwl_irq_chip,
> +				domain->host_data, handle_simple_irq,
> +				NULL, NULL);
> +		virq = virq + 1;
> +	}

I really don't see how this allocator guarantees that all hwirqs are
contiguous. I already mentioned this when reviewing v7, and you still
haven't got it right. So either you allocate *contiguous* hwirqs in an
atomic fashion, or you drop support for multi-MSI.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v8] PCI: Xilinx-NWL-PCIe: Added support for Xilinx NWL PCIe Host Controller
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 17:37:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151111173712.7dde8a42@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447223619-30945-1-git-send-email-bharatku@xilinx.com>

On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 12:03:39 +0530
Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com> wrote:

> Adding PCIe Root Port driver for Xilinx PCIe NWL bridge IP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@xilinx.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ravi Kiran Gummaluri <rgummal@xilinx.com>
> ---
> Added logic to allocate contiguous hwirq in nwl_irq_domain_alloc function.
> Moved MSI functionality to separate functions.
> Changed error return values.
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/pci/xilinx-nwl-pcie.txt    |   68 ++
>  drivers/pci/host/Kconfig                           |   16 +-
>  drivers/pci/host/Makefile                          |    1 +
>  drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c                 | 1062 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 1144 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/xilinx-nwl-pcie.txt
>  create mode 100644 drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..8bc509c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c

[...]

> +static struct msi_domain_info nwl_msi_domain_info = {
> +	.flags = (MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS | MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS |
> +		  MSI_FLAG_MULTI_PCI_MSI),

Given that you claim to support multi-MSI...

[...]

> +static int nwl_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
> +				unsigned int nr_irqs, void *args)
> +{
> +	struct nwl_pcie *pcie = domain->host_data;
> +	struct nwl_msi *msi = &pcie->msi;
> +	unsigned long bit;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&msi->lock);
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++) {
> +		bit = find_first_zero_bit(msi->used, INT_PCI_MSI_NR);
> +		if (bit < INT_PCI_MSI_NR)
> +			set_bit(bit, msi->used);
> +		else
> +			bit = -ENOSPC;
> +
> +		if (bit < 0) {
> +			mutex_unlock(&msi->lock);
> +			return bit;
> +		}
> +
> +		irq_domain_set_info(domain, virq, bit, &nwl_irq_chip,
> +				domain->host_data, handle_simple_irq,
> +				NULL, NULL);
> +		virq = virq + 1;
> +	}

I really don't see how this allocator guarantees that all hwirqs are
contiguous. I already mentioned this when reviewing v7, and you still
haven't got it right. So either you allocate *contiguous* hwirqs in an
atomic fashion, or you drop support for multi-MSI.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com>
Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org,
	michals@xilinx.com, sorenb@xilinx.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
	arnd@arndb.de, tinamdar@apm.com, treding@nvidia.com,
	rjui@broadcom.com, Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com,
	m-karicheri2@ti.com, hauke@hauke-m.de, dhdang@apm.com,
	sbranden@broadcom.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@xilinx.com>,
	Ravi Kiran Gummaluri <rgummal@xilinx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] PCI: Xilinx-NWL-PCIe: Added support for Xilinx NWL PCIe Host Controller
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 17:37:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151111173712.7dde8a42@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447223619-30945-1-git-send-email-bharatku@xilinx.com>

On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 12:03:39 +0530
Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com> wrote:

> Adding PCIe Root Port driver for Xilinx PCIe NWL bridge IP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@xilinx.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ravi Kiran Gummaluri <rgummal@xilinx.com>
> ---
> Added logic to allocate contiguous hwirq in nwl_irq_domain_alloc function.
> Moved MSI functionality to separate functions.
> Changed error return values.
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/pci/xilinx-nwl-pcie.txt    |   68 ++
>  drivers/pci/host/Kconfig                           |   16 +-
>  drivers/pci/host/Makefile                          |    1 +
>  drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c                 | 1062 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 1144 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/xilinx-nwl-pcie.txt
>  create mode 100644 drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..8bc509c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c

[...]

> +static struct msi_domain_info nwl_msi_domain_info = {
> +	.flags = (MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS | MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS |
> +		  MSI_FLAG_MULTI_PCI_MSI),

Given that you claim to support multi-MSI...

[...]

> +static int nwl_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
> +				unsigned int nr_irqs, void *args)
> +{
> +	struct nwl_pcie *pcie = domain->host_data;
> +	struct nwl_msi *msi = &pcie->msi;
> +	unsigned long bit;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&msi->lock);
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++) {
> +		bit = find_first_zero_bit(msi->used, INT_PCI_MSI_NR);
> +		if (bit < INT_PCI_MSI_NR)
> +			set_bit(bit, msi->used);
> +		else
> +			bit = -ENOSPC;
> +
> +		if (bit < 0) {
> +			mutex_unlock(&msi->lock);
> +			return bit;
> +		}
> +
> +		irq_domain_set_info(domain, virq, bit, &nwl_irq_chip,
> +				domain->host_data, handle_simple_irq,
> +				NULL, NULL);
> +		virq = virq + 1;
> +	}

I really don't see how this allocator guarantees that all hwirqs are
contiguous. I already mentioned this when reviewing v7, and you still
haven't got it right. So either you allocate *contiguous* hwirqs in an
atomic fashion, or you drop support for multi-MSI.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-11 17:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-11  6:33 [PATCH v8] PCI: Xilinx-NWL-PCIe: Added support for Xilinx NWL PCIe Host Controller Bharat Kumar Gogada
2015-11-11  6:33 ` Bharat Kumar Gogada
2015-11-11  6:33 ` Bharat Kumar Gogada
2015-11-11 17:37 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2015-11-11 17:37   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-11 17:37   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-17  5:06   ` Bharat Kumar Gogada
2015-11-17  5:06     ` Bharat Kumar Gogada
2015-11-17  5:06     ` Bharat Kumar Gogada
2015-11-11 20:29 ` Rob Herring
2015-11-11 20:29   ` Rob Herring
2015-11-11 20:29   ` Rob Herring
2015-11-16 10:27   ` Bharat Kumar Gogada
2015-11-16 10:27     ` Bharat Kumar Gogada
2015-11-16 10:27     ` Bharat Kumar Gogada
2015-11-16 15:14 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 15:14   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-16 22:01   ` Ray Jui
2015-11-16 22:01     ` Ray Jui
2015-11-16 22:01     ` Ray Jui
2015-11-17  4:59     ` Bharat Kumar Gogada
2015-11-17  4:59       ` Bharat Kumar Gogada
2015-11-17  9:21       ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-17  9:21         ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-17  9:21         ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-17 13:27         ` Bharat Kumar Gogada
2015-11-17 13:27           ` Bharat Kumar Gogada
2015-11-17 13:27           ` Bharat Kumar Gogada
2015-11-17 13:55           ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-17 13:55             ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-17 13:55             ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-17 16:24             ` Ray Jui
2015-11-17 16:24               ` Ray Jui
2015-11-17 16:24               ` Ray Jui
2015-11-18  6:51               ` Bharat Kumar Gogada
2015-11-18  6:51                 ` Bharat Kumar Gogada
2015-11-18  6:51                 ` Bharat Kumar Gogada
2015-11-16 22:16 ` Ray Jui
2015-11-16 22:16   ` Ray Jui
2015-11-16 22:16   ` Ray Jui
2015-11-17  5:01   ` Bharat Kumar Gogada
2015-11-17  5:01     ` Bharat Kumar Gogada

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151111173712.7dde8a42@arm.com \
    --to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com \
    --cc=bharatku@xilinx.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dhdang@apm.com \
    --cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=hauke@hauke-m.de \
    --cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m-karicheri2@ti.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=michals@xilinx.com \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=rgummal@xilinx.com \
    --cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
    --cc=sorenb@xilinx.com \
    --cc=tinamdar@apm.com \
    --cc=treding@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.