From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
To: Chris Zhong <zyw@rock-chips.com>
Cc: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org>,
Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@chromium.org>,
emil.l.velikov@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>,
rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk,
Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma@samsung.com>,
ajaykumar.rs@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/13] drm/bridge: Add Synopsys DesignWare MIPI DSI host controller driver
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 17:07:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151120160706.GE3300@ulmo.nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448007339-10966-7-git-send-email-zyw@rock-chips.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 17628 bytes --]
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 04:15:32PM +0800, Chris Zhong wrote:
> add Synopsys DesignWare MIPI DSI host controller driver support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Zhong <zyw@rock-chips.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v4:
> eliminate some warnning
>
> Changes in v3: None
> Changes in v2: None
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig | 11 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.c | 1056 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.h | 27 +
> 4 files changed, 1095 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.c
> create mode 100644 include/drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig
> index 6dddd39..c0900e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig
> @@ -22,6 +22,17 @@ config DRM_DW_HDMI_AHB_AUDIO
> Designware HDMI block. This is used in conjunction with
> the i.MX6 HDMI driver.
>
> +config DRM_DW_MIPI_DSI
> + tristate "Synopsys DesignWare MIPI DSI host controller bridge"
> + depends on DRM
> + select DRM_KMS_HELPER
> + select DRM_MIPI_DSI
> + select DRM_PANEL
> + help
> + Choose this if you want to use the Synopsys DesignWare MIPI DSI host
> + controller bridge. If M is selected, the module will be
> + called dw_mipi_dsi. DRM_MIPI_DSI support is required for this driver
> + to work.
Just drop the last sentence, it doesn't add value since that's already
expressed in the "select DRM_MIPI_DSI" statement.
Also, please use hyphens instead of underscore to separate parts in
module names.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile
> index d4e28be..d908c4b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile
> @@ -2,5 +2,6 @@ ccflags-y := -Iinclude/drm
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_DW_HDMI) += dw_hdmi.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_DW_HDMI_AHB_AUDIO) += dw_hdmi-ahb-audio.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_DW_MIPI_DSI) += dw_mipi_dsi.o
Like I said above, this should be dw-mipi-dsi.o. I know dw_hdmi uses the
underscores, but that's something I plan on fixing.
> obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_NXP_PTN3460) += nxp-ptn3460.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PARADE_PS8622) += parade-ps8622.o
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..23b612d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,1056 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2014, Fuzhou Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd
Does this need to be updated? We're pretty far into 2015 by now.
> +struct dw_mipi_dsi {
> + struct mipi_dsi_host dsi_host;
> + struct drm_connector connector;
> + struct drm_encoder *encoder;
struct drm_bridge already has a pointer to an encoder, can't you reuse
that instead?
> + struct drm_bridge *bridge;
Typically you'd embed the bridge into the driver structure.
> + struct drm_panel *panel;
> + struct device *dev;
> +
> + void __iomem *base;
> +
> + struct clk *pllref_clk;
> + struct clk *cfg_clk;
> + struct clk *pclk;
> +
> + unsigned int lane_mbps; /* per lane */
> + u32 channel;
> + u32 lanes;
> + u32 format;
> + u16 input_div;
> + u16 feedback_div;
> + struct drm_display_mode *mode;
> +
> + const struct dw_mipi_dsi_plat_data *pdata;
> +
> + bool enabled;
> +};
> +
> +enum {
> + STATUS_TO_CLEAR,
> + STATUS_TO_SET,
> +};
This seems to be used only as replacement for false/true, so you should
just use false/true instead and remove these.
> +/* The table is based on 27MHz DPHY pll reference clock. */
> +static const struct dphy_pll_testdin_map dptdin_map[] = {
> + {90, 0x00}, {100, 0x10}, {110, 0x20}, {130, 0x01},
> + {140, 0x11}, {150, 0x21}, {170, 0x02}, {180, 0x12},
> + {200, 0x22}, {220, 0x03}, {240, 0x13}, {250, 0x23},
> + {270, 0x04}, {300, 0x14}, {330, 0x05}, {360, 0x15},
> + {400, 0x25}, {450, 0x06}, {500, 0x16}, {550, 0x07},
> + {600, 0x17}, {650, 0x08}, {700, 0x18}, {750, 0x09},
> + {800, 0x19}, {850, 0x29}, {900, 0x39}, {950, 0x0a},
> + {1000, 0x1a}, {1050, 0x2a}, {1100, 0x3a}, {1150, 0x0b},
> + {1200, 0x1b}, {1250, 0x2b}, {1300, 0x3b}, {1350, 0x0c},
> + {1400, 0x1c}, {1450, 0x2c}, {1500, 0x3c}
> +};
Might be worth reformatting this to be more table-like.
> +static inline void dsi_write(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi, u32 reg, u32 val)
> +{
> + writel(val, dsi->base + reg);
> +}
> +
> +static inline u32 dsi_read(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi, u32 reg)
> +{
> + return readl(dsi->base + reg);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void dsi_modify(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi, u32 reg,
> + u32 mask, u32 val)
> +{
> + u32 v;
> +
> + v = readl(dsi->base + reg);
> + v &= ~mask;
> + v |= val;
> + writel(v, dsi->base + reg);
> +}
Perhaps reuse dsi_read() and dsi_write() here?
> +static int check_status(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi, u32 reg, u32 status,
> + unsigned int timeout, bool to_set)
> +{
> + unsigned long expire;
> + bool out;
> + u32 val;
> +
> + expire = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(timeout);
> + for (;;) {
> + val = dsi_read(dsi, reg);
> + out = to_set ? ((val & status) == status) : !(val & status);
> + if (out)
> + break;
> +
> + if (time_after(jiffies, expire))
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +
> + cpu_relax();
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Perhaps use the helpers in linux/iopoll.h?
> +/*
> + * The controller should generate 2 frames before
> + * preparing the peripheral.
> + */
> +static void dw_mipi_dsi_wait_for_two_frames(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi)
> +{
> + unsigned long expire;
> + int refresh, two_frames;
> +
> + refresh = drm_mode_vrefresh(dsi->mode);
> + two_frames = DIV_ROUND_UP(MSEC_PER_SEC, refresh) * 2;
> +
> + expire = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(two_frames);
> + while (time_before(jiffies, expire))
> + cpu_relax();
> +}
That's kind of rude. You know already how long it will take for two
frames to be sent, why not just sleep for that time? usleep_range() or
in this case most likely msleep() would be more civil options.
> +static void dw_mipi_dsi_phy_test(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi, u8 test_code,
> + u8 test_data)
> +{
> + dsi_write(dsi, DSI_PHY_TST_CTRL0, PHY_UNTESTCLK | PHY_UNTESTCLR);
> +
> + dsi_write(dsi, DSI_PHY_TST_CTRL1, PHY_TESTEN | PHY_TESTDOUT(0) |
> + PHY_TESTDIN(test_code));
> +
> + dsi_write(dsi, DSI_PHY_TST_CTRL0, PHY_TESTCLK | PHY_UNTESTCLR);
> + dsi_write(dsi, DSI_PHY_TST_CTRL0, PHY_UNTESTCLK | PHY_UNTESTCLR);
> +
> + dsi_write(dsi, DSI_PHY_TST_CTRL1, PHY_UNTESTEN | PHY_TESTDOUT(0) |
> + PHY_TESTDIN(test_data));
> +
> + dsi_write(dsi, DSI_PHY_TST_CTRL0, PHY_TESTCLK | PHY_UNTESTCLR);
> + dsi_write(dsi, DSI_PHY_TST_CTRL0, PHY_UNTESTCLK | PHY_UNTESTCLR);
> +}
This looks like it's actually programming something, rather than
testing. Can you perhaps add a comment to this explaining what exactly
it's doing?
> +static int dw_mipi_dsi_phy_init(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi)
> +{
> + int ret, testdin, vco;
> +
> + vco = (dsi->lane_mbps < 200) ? 0 : (dsi->lane_mbps + 100) / 200;
> +
> + testdin = max_mbps_to_testdin(dsi->lane_mbps);
> + if (testdin < 0) {
> + dev_err(dsi->dev,
> + "failed to get testdin for %dmbps lane clock\n",
> + dsi->lane_mbps);
> + return testdin;
> + }
> +
> + dsi_write(dsi, DSI_PWR_UP, POWERUP);
> +
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_test(dsi, 0x10, 0x80 | (vco & 0x7) << 3 | 0x3);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_test(dsi, 0x11, 0x8);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_test(dsi, 0x12, 0xc0);
> +
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_test(dsi, 0x44, testdin << 1);
> +
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_test(dsi, 0x17, dsi->input_div - 1);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_test(dsi, 0x18, (dsi->feedback_div - 1) & 0x1f);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_test(dsi, 0x18, (dsi->feedback_div - 1) >> 5 | 0x80);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_test(dsi, 0x19, 0x30);
> +
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_test(dsi, 0x20, 0x4d);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_test(dsi, 0x21, 0x3d);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_test(dsi, 0x21, 0xdf);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_test(dsi, 0x22, 0x7);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_test(dsi, 0x22, 0x87);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_test(dsi, 0x70, 0x80 | 0xf);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_test(dsi, 0x71, 0x80 | 0x55);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_test(dsi, 0x72, 0x40 | 0xa);
Can we have symbolic names for these values?
> + dsi_write(dsi, DSI_PHY_RSTZ, PHY_ENFORCEPLL | PHY_ENABLECLK
> + | PHY_UNRSTZ | PHY_UNSHUTDOWNZ);
I think it's more conventional to put the | on the first line. I also
think it'd be more readable to align PHY_UNRSTZ | PHY_UNSHUTDOWNZ with
the other values that form this parameter, like so:
dsi_write(dsi, DSI_PHY_RSTZ, PHY_ENFORCEPLL | PHY_ENABLECLK |
PHY_UNRSTZ | PHY_UNSHUTDOWNZ);
> +static int dw_mipi_dsi_get_lane_bps(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi)
> +{
> + int bpp, i;
i should be unsigned int.
> + unsigned int max_mbps = 0, target_mbps = 1000;
> + unsigned long mpclk, pllref, tmp;
> + int m = 1, n = 1, pre;
These can be unsigned int as well.
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dptdin_map); i++) {
> + if (max_mbps < dptdin_map[i].max_mbps)
> + max_mbps = dptdin_map[i].max_mbps;
> + }
Looks to me like this will always be 1500. Why go through the trouble of
looking up the value if you know that the table is sorted by increasing
max_mbps? Hard-coding to 1500 isn't very nice either, but you could do
something like:
max_mbps = dptdin_map[ARRAY_SIZE(dptdin_map) - 1].max_mbps;
> +static int dw_mipi_dsi_host_attach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
> + struct mipi_dsi_device *device)
> +{
> + struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi = host_to_dsi(host);
> +
> + if (device->lanes > dsi->pdata->max_data_lanes) {
> + dev_err(dsi->dev, "the number of data lanes(%d) is too many\n",
Use %u for unsigned integers.
> + device->lanes);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (!(device->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST) ||
> + !(device->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_SYNC_PULSE)) {
> + dev_err(dsi->dev, "device mode is unsupported\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + dsi->lanes = device->lanes;
> + dsi->channel = device->channel;
> + dsi->format = device->format;
> + dsi->panel = of_drm_find_panel(device->dev.of_node);
You might want to check this for validity?
> + drm_panel_attach(dsi->panel, &dsi->connector);
You should check for errors here.
> +static int dw_mipi_dsi_dcs_short_write(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi,
> + const struct mipi_dsi_msg *msg)
> +{
> + const u16 *tx_buf = msg->tx_buf;
> + u32 val = GEN_HDATA(*tx_buf) | GEN_HTYPE(msg->type);
> +
> + if (msg->tx_len > 2) {
> + dev_err(dsi->dev, "too long tx buf length %d for short write\n",
> + (int)msg->tx_len);
No need to cast here. Simply use %zu as the format specifier.
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return dw_mipi_dsi_gen_pkt_hdr_write(dsi, val);
> +}
> +
> +static int dw_mipi_dsi_dcs_long_write(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi,
> + const struct mipi_dsi_msg *msg)
> +{
> + const u32 *tx_buf = msg->tx_buf;
> + int len = msg->tx_len, pld_data_bytes = sizeof(*tx_buf), ret;
> + u32 val = GEN_HDATA(msg->tx_len) | GEN_HTYPE(msg->type);
> + u32 remainder = 0;
> +
> + if (msg->tx_len < 3) {
> + dev_err(dsi->dev, "wrong tx buf length %d for long write\n",
> + (int)msg->tx_len);
Same here.
> +static void dw_mipi_dsi_bridge_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> +{
> + struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi = bridge->driver_private;
> +
> + if (dsi->enabled)
> + return;
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(dsi->cfg_clk))
> + clk_prepare_enable(dsi->cfg_clk);
> +
> + clk_prepare_enable(dsi->pclk);
Please always error-check clk_prepare() and clk_enable() (or the
combination clk_prepare_enable()). They can fail.
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_init(dsi);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_set_mode(dsi, DW_MIPI_DSI_VID_MODE);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_wait_for_two_frames(dsi);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_set_mode(dsi, DW_MIPI_DSI_CMD_MODE);
> + drm_panel_prepare(dsi->panel);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_set_mode(dsi, DW_MIPI_DSI_VID_MODE);
> + clk_disable_unprepare(dsi->pclk);
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(dsi->cfg_clk))
> + clk_disable_unprepare(dsi->cfg_clk);
> +
> + drm_panel_enable(dsi->panel);
> +
> + dsi->enabled = true;
> +}
> +
> +static void dw_mipi_dsi_bridge_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> +{
> + struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi = bridge->driver_private;
> + unsigned long expire;
> +
> + if (!dsi->enabled)
> + return;
> +
> + drm_panel_disable(dsi->panel);
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(dsi->cfg_clk))
> + clk_prepare_enable(dsi->cfg_clk);
> +
> + clk_prepare_enable(dsi->pclk);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_set_mode(dsi, DW_MIPI_DSI_CMD_MODE);
> + drm_panel_unprepare(dsi->panel);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_set_mode(dsi, DW_MIPI_DSI_VID_MODE);
> +
> + /*
> + * This is necessary to make sure the peripheral
> + * will be driven normally when the display is
> + * enabled again later.
> + */
You can use longer lines for comments. No need to split it across three
lines if you can make it fit on two.
> + expire = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(120);
> + while (time_before(jiffies, expire))
> + cpu_relax();
Again, cpu_relax() isn't really relaxing the CPU to the extent that it
might lead you to think. If you know you want to sleep for 120 ms, just
do msleep(120).
> +
> + dw_mipi_dsi_set_mode(dsi, DW_MIPI_DSI_CMD_MODE);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_disable(dsi);
> + clk_disable_unprepare(dsi->pclk);
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(dsi->cfg_clk))
> + clk_disable_unprepare(dsi->cfg_clk);
> +
> + dsi->enabled = false;
> +}
> +
> +static void dw_mipi_dsi_bridge_nope(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
Hehe, perhaps dw_mipi_dsi_bridge_nop()? Or simply leave the function
pointers NULL, but I guess you had to add this because the DRM bridge
infrastructure doesn't allow these to be optional. We might want to
change that.
> +{
> + /* do nothing */
> +}
> +
> +static void dw_mipi_dsi_init(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi)
> +{
> + dsi_write(dsi, DSI_PWR_UP, RESET);
> + dsi_write(dsi, DSI_PHY_RSTZ, PHY_DISFORCEPLL | PHY_DISABLECLK
> + | PHY_RSTZ | PHY_SHUTDOWNZ);
> + dsi_write(dsi, DSI_CLKMGR_CFG, TO_CLK_DIVIDSION(10) |
> + TX_ESC_CLK_DIVIDSION(7));
> + dsi_write(dsi, DSI_LPCLK_CTRL, PHY_TXREQUESTCLKHS);
> +}
> +
> +static void dw_mipi_dsi_dpi_config(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi,
> + struct drm_display_mode *mode)
> +{
> + u32 val = 0, calor = 0;
"color"?
> +static void dw_mipi_dsi_bridge_mode_set(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> + struct drm_display_mode *mode,
> + struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode)
> +{
> + struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi = bridge->driver_private;
> + int ret;
> +
> + dsi->mode = adjusted_mode;
> +
> + ret = dw_mipi_dsi_get_lane_bps(dsi);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return;
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(dsi->cfg_clk))
> + clk_prepare_enable(dsi->cfg_clk);
> +
> + clk_prepare_enable(dsi->pclk);
Again, check errors from clk_prepare_enable(), ...
> + dw_mipi_dsi_init(dsi);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_dpi_config(dsi, mode);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_packet_handler_config(dsi);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_video_mode_config(dsi);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_video_packet_config(dsi, mode);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_command_mode_config(dsi);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_line_timer_config(dsi);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_vertical_timing_config(dsi);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_dphy_timing_config(dsi);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_dphy_interface_config(dsi);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_clear_err(dsi);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_init(dsi);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_wait_for_two_frames(dsi);
> + drm_panel_prepare(dsi->panel);
... and drm_panel_prepare().
> +static struct drm_bridge_funcs dw_mipi_dsi_bridge_funcs = {
static const, please.
> +int dw_mipi_dsi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data,
> + struct drm_encoder *encoder,
> + const struct dw_mipi_dsi_plat_data *pdata)
> +{
[...]
> + dsi->cfg_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "cfg");
> + if (IS_ERR(dsi->cfg_clk))
> + dev_warn(dev, "Have no configuration clock\n");
Is this truly optional?
> + dsi->pclk = devm_clk_get(dev, "pclk");
> + if (IS_ERR(dsi->pclk)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(dsi->pclk);
> + dev_err(dev, "Unable to get configuration clock: %d\n", ret);
pclk doesn't seem to be a "configuration clock".
> + dev_info(dev, "version number is 0x%08x\n", val);
Do you really need this information? What purpose does it serve to have
this in the kernel log?
> diff --git a/include/drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.h b/include/drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..2e351e4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2014-2015 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
> + * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
> + * of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __DW_MIPI_DSI__
> +#define __DW_MIPI_DSI__
> +
> +#include <drm/drmP.h>
> +
> +struct dw_mipi_dsi_plat_data {
> + unsigned int max_data_lanes;
> + enum drm_mode_status (*mode_valid)(struct drm_connector *connector,
> + struct drm_display_mode *mode);
> +};
> +
> +int dw_mipi_dsi_get_encoder_pixel_format(struct drm_encoder *encoder);
> +
> +int dw_mipi_dsi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
> + void *data, struct drm_encoder *encoder,
> + const struct dw_mipi_dsi_plat_data *pdata);
> +void dw_mipi_dsi_unbind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data);
> +#endif /* __DW_MIPI_DSI__ */
Should have a blank line between the two above.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
To: Chris Zhong <zyw@rock-chips.com>
Cc: <heiko@sntech.de>, <linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
<mark.yao@rock-chips.com>, <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>,
<airlied@linux.ie>, <ajaykumar.rs@samsung.com>,
<rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>, "Takashi Iwai" <tiwai@suse.de>,
Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org>,
Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>,
Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma@samsung.com>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@chromium.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/13] drm/bridge: Add Synopsys DesignWare MIPI DSI host controller driver
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 17:07:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151120160706.GE3300@ulmo.nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448007339-10966-7-git-send-email-zyw@rock-chips.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 17628 bytes --]
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 04:15:32PM +0800, Chris Zhong wrote:
> add Synopsys DesignWare MIPI DSI host controller driver support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Zhong <zyw@rock-chips.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v4:
> eliminate some warnning
>
> Changes in v3: None
> Changes in v2: None
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig | 11 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.c | 1056 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.h | 27 +
> 4 files changed, 1095 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.c
> create mode 100644 include/drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig
> index 6dddd39..c0900e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig
> @@ -22,6 +22,17 @@ config DRM_DW_HDMI_AHB_AUDIO
> Designware HDMI block. This is used in conjunction with
> the i.MX6 HDMI driver.
>
> +config DRM_DW_MIPI_DSI
> + tristate "Synopsys DesignWare MIPI DSI host controller bridge"
> + depends on DRM
> + select DRM_KMS_HELPER
> + select DRM_MIPI_DSI
> + select DRM_PANEL
> + help
> + Choose this if you want to use the Synopsys DesignWare MIPI DSI host
> + controller bridge. If M is selected, the module will be
> + called dw_mipi_dsi. DRM_MIPI_DSI support is required for this driver
> + to work.
Just drop the last sentence, it doesn't add value since that's already
expressed in the "select DRM_MIPI_DSI" statement.
Also, please use hyphens instead of underscore to separate parts in
module names.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile
> index d4e28be..d908c4b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile
> @@ -2,5 +2,6 @@ ccflags-y := -Iinclude/drm
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_DW_HDMI) += dw_hdmi.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_DW_HDMI_AHB_AUDIO) += dw_hdmi-ahb-audio.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_DW_MIPI_DSI) += dw_mipi_dsi.o
Like I said above, this should be dw-mipi-dsi.o. I know dw_hdmi uses the
underscores, but that's something I plan on fixing.
> obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_NXP_PTN3460) += nxp-ptn3460.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PARADE_PS8622) += parade-ps8622.o
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..23b612d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,1056 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2014, Fuzhou Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd
Does this need to be updated? We're pretty far into 2015 by now.
> +struct dw_mipi_dsi {
> + struct mipi_dsi_host dsi_host;
> + struct drm_connector connector;
> + struct drm_encoder *encoder;
struct drm_bridge already has a pointer to an encoder, can't you reuse
that instead?
> + struct drm_bridge *bridge;
Typically you'd embed the bridge into the driver structure.
> + struct drm_panel *panel;
> + struct device *dev;
> +
> + void __iomem *base;
> +
> + struct clk *pllref_clk;
> + struct clk *cfg_clk;
> + struct clk *pclk;
> +
> + unsigned int lane_mbps; /* per lane */
> + u32 channel;
> + u32 lanes;
> + u32 format;
> + u16 input_div;
> + u16 feedback_div;
> + struct drm_display_mode *mode;
> +
> + const struct dw_mipi_dsi_plat_data *pdata;
> +
> + bool enabled;
> +};
> +
> +enum {
> + STATUS_TO_CLEAR,
> + STATUS_TO_SET,
> +};
This seems to be used only as replacement for false/true, so you should
just use false/true instead and remove these.
> +/* The table is based on 27MHz DPHY pll reference clock. */
> +static const struct dphy_pll_testdin_map dptdin_map[] = {
> + {90, 0x00}, {100, 0x10}, {110, 0x20}, {130, 0x01},
> + {140, 0x11}, {150, 0x21}, {170, 0x02}, {180, 0x12},
> + {200, 0x22}, {220, 0x03}, {240, 0x13}, {250, 0x23},
> + {270, 0x04}, {300, 0x14}, {330, 0x05}, {360, 0x15},
> + {400, 0x25}, {450, 0x06}, {500, 0x16}, {550, 0x07},
> + {600, 0x17}, {650, 0x08}, {700, 0x18}, {750, 0x09},
> + {800, 0x19}, {850, 0x29}, {900, 0x39}, {950, 0x0a},
> + {1000, 0x1a}, {1050, 0x2a}, {1100, 0x3a}, {1150, 0x0b},
> + {1200, 0x1b}, {1250, 0x2b}, {1300, 0x3b}, {1350, 0x0c},
> + {1400, 0x1c}, {1450, 0x2c}, {1500, 0x3c}
> +};
Might be worth reformatting this to be more table-like.
> +static inline void dsi_write(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi, u32 reg, u32 val)
> +{
> + writel(val, dsi->base + reg);
> +}
> +
> +static inline u32 dsi_read(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi, u32 reg)
> +{
> + return readl(dsi->base + reg);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void dsi_modify(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi, u32 reg,
> + u32 mask, u32 val)
> +{
> + u32 v;
> +
> + v = readl(dsi->base + reg);
> + v &= ~mask;
> + v |= val;
> + writel(v, dsi->base + reg);
> +}
Perhaps reuse dsi_read() and dsi_write() here?
> +static int check_status(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi, u32 reg, u32 status,
> + unsigned int timeout, bool to_set)
> +{
> + unsigned long expire;
> + bool out;
> + u32 val;
> +
> + expire = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(timeout);
> + for (;;) {
> + val = dsi_read(dsi, reg);
> + out = to_set ? ((val & status) == status) : !(val & status);
> + if (out)
> + break;
> +
> + if (time_after(jiffies, expire))
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +
> + cpu_relax();
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Perhaps use the helpers in linux/iopoll.h?
> +/*
> + * The controller should generate 2 frames before
> + * preparing the peripheral.
> + */
> +static void dw_mipi_dsi_wait_for_two_frames(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi)
> +{
> + unsigned long expire;
> + int refresh, two_frames;
> +
> + refresh = drm_mode_vrefresh(dsi->mode);
> + two_frames = DIV_ROUND_UP(MSEC_PER_SEC, refresh) * 2;
> +
> + expire = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(two_frames);
> + while (time_before(jiffies, expire))
> + cpu_relax();
> +}
That's kind of rude. You know already how long it will take for two
frames to be sent, why not just sleep for that time? usleep_range() or
in this case most likely msleep() would be more civil options.
> +static void dw_mipi_dsi_phy_test(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi, u8 test_code,
> + u8 test_data)
> +{
> + dsi_write(dsi, DSI_PHY_TST_CTRL0, PHY_UNTESTCLK | PHY_UNTESTCLR);
> +
> + dsi_write(dsi, DSI_PHY_TST_CTRL1, PHY_TESTEN | PHY_TESTDOUT(0) |
> + PHY_TESTDIN(test_code));
> +
> + dsi_write(dsi, DSI_PHY_TST_CTRL0, PHY_TESTCLK | PHY_UNTESTCLR);
> + dsi_write(dsi, DSI_PHY_TST_CTRL0, PHY_UNTESTCLK | PHY_UNTESTCLR);
> +
> + dsi_write(dsi, DSI_PHY_TST_CTRL1, PHY_UNTESTEN | PHY_TESTDOUT(0) |
> + PHY_TESTDIN(test_data));
> +
> + dsi_write(dsi, DSI_PHY_TST_CTRL0, PHY_TESTCLK | PHY_UNTESTCLR);
> + dsi_write(dsi, DSI_PHY_TST_CTRL0, PHY_UNTESTCLK | PHY_UNTESTCLR);
> +}
This looks like it's actually programming something, rather than
testing. Can you perhaps add a comment to this explaining what exactly
it's doing?
> +static int dw_mipi_dsi_phy_init(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi)
> +{
> + int ret, testdin, vco;
> +
> + vco = (dsi->lane_mbps < 200) ? 0 : (dsi->lane_mbps + 100) / 200;
> +
> + testdin = max_mbps_to_testdin(dsi->lane_mbps);
> + if (testdin < 0) {
> + dev_err(dsi->dev,
> + "failed to get testdin for %dmbps lane clock\n",
> + dsi->lane_mbps);
> + return testdin;
> + }
> +
> + dsi_write(dsi, DSI_PWR_UP, POWERUP);
> +
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_test(dsi, 0x10, 0x80 | (vco & 0x7) << 3 | 0x3);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_test(dsi, 0x11, 0x8);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_test(dsi, 0x12, 0xc0);
> +
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_test(dsi, 0x44, testdin << 1);
> +
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_test(dsi, 0x17, dsi->input_div - 1);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_test(dsi, 0x18, (dsi->feedback_div - 1) & 0x1f);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_test(dsi, 0x18, (dsi->feedback_div - 1) >> 5 | 0x80);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_test(dsi, 0x19, 0x30);
> +
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_test(dsi, 0x20, 0x4d);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_test(dsi, 0x21, 0x3d);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_test(dsi, 0x21, 0xdf);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_test(dsi, 0x22, 0x7);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_test(dsi, 0x22, 0x87);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_test(dsi, 0x70, 0x80 | 0xf);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_test(dsi, 0x71, 0x80 | 0x55);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_test(dsi, 0x72, 0x40 | 0xa);
Can we have symbolic names for these values?
> + dsi_write(dsi, DSI_PHY_RSTZ, PHY_ENFORCEPLL | PHY_ENABLECLK
> + | PHY_UNRSTZ | PHY_UNSHUTDOWNZ);
I think it's more conventional to put the | on the first line. I also
think it'd be more readable to align PHY_UNRSTZ | PHY_UNSHUTDOWNZ with
the other values that form this parameter, like so:
dsi_write(dsi, DSI_PHY_RSTZ, PHY_ENFORCEPLL | PHY_ENABLECLK |
PHY_UNRSTZ | PHY_UNSHUTDOWNZ);
> +static int dw_mipi_dsi_get_lane_bps(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi)
> +{
> + int bpp, i;
i should be unsigned int.
> + unsigned int max_mbps = 0, target_mbps = 1000;
> + unsigned long mpclk, pllref, tmp;
> + int m = 1, n = 1, pre;
These can be unsigned int as well.
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dptdin_map); i++) {
> + if (max_mbps < dptdin_map[i].max_mbps)
> + max_mbps = dptdin_map[i].max_mbps;
> + }
Looks to me like this will always be 1500. Why go through the trouble of
looking up the value if you know that the table is sorted by increasing
max_mbps? Hard-coding to 1500 isn't very nice either, but you could do
something like:
max_mbps = dptdin_map[ARRAY_SIZE(dptdin_map) - 1].max_mbps;
> +static int dw_mipi_dsi_host_attach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
> + struct mipi_dsi_device *device)
> +{
> + struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi = host_to_dsi(host);
> +
> + if (device->lanes > dsi->pdata->max_data_lanes) {
> + dev_err(dsi->dev, "the number of data lanes(%d) is too many\n",
Use %u for unsigned integers.
> + device->lanes);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (!(device->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST) ||
> + !(device->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_SYNC_PULSE)) {
> + dev_err(dsi->dev, "device mode is unsupported\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + dsi->lanes = device->lanes;
> + dsi->channel = device->channel;
> + dsi->format = device->format;
> + dsi->panel = of_drm_find_panel(device->dev.of_node);
You might want to check this for validity?
> + drm_panel_attach(dsi->panel, &dsi->connector);
You should check for errors here.
> +static int dw_mipi_dsi_dcs_short_write(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi,
> + const struct mipi_dsi_msg *msg)
> +{
> + const u16 *tx_buf = msg->tx_buf;
> + u32 val = GEN_HDATA(*tx_buf) | GEN_HTYPE(msg->type);
> +
> + if (msg->tx_len > 2) {
> + dev_err(dsi->dev, "too long tx buf length %d for short write\n",
> + (int)msg->tx_len);
No need to cast here. Simply use %zu as the format specifier.
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return dw_mipi_dsi_gen_pkt_hdr_write(dsi, val);
> +}
> +
> +static int dw_mipi_dsi_dcs_long_write(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi,
> + const struct mipi_dsi_msg *msg)
> +{
> + const u32 *tx_buf = msg->tx_buf;
> + int len = msg->tx_len, pld_data_bytes = sizeof(*tx_buf), ret;
> + u32 val = GEN_HDATA(msg->tx_len) | GEN_HTYPE(msg->type);
> + u32 remainder = 0;
> +
> + if (msg->tx_len < 3) {
> + dev_err(dsi->dev, "wrong tx buf length %d for long write\n",
> + (int)msg->tx_len);
Same here.
> +static void dw_mipi_dsi_bridge_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> +{
> + struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi = bridge->driver_private;
> +
> + if (dsi->enabled)
> + return;
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(dsi->cfg_clk))
> + clk_prepare_enable(dsi->cfg_clk);
> +
> + clk_prepare_enable(dsi->pclk);
Please always error-check clk_prepare() and clk_enable() (or the
combination clk_prepare_enable()). They can fail.
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_init(dsi);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_set_mode(dsi, DW_MIPI_DSI_VID_MODE);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_wait_for_two_frames(dsi);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_set_mode(dsi, DW_MIPI_DSI_CMD_MODE);
> + drm_panel_prepare(dsi->panel);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_set_mode(dsi, DW_MIPI_DSI_VID_MODE);
> + clk_disable_unprepare(dsi->pclk);
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(dsi->cfg_clk))
> + clk_disable_unprepare(dsi->cfg_clk);
> +
> + drm_panel_enable(dsi->panel);
> +
> + dsi->enabled = true;
> +}
> +
> +static void dw_mipi_dsi_bridge_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> +{
> + struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi = bridge->driver_private;
> + unsigned long expire;
> +
> + if (!dsi->enabled)
> + return;
> +
> + drm_panel_disable(dsi->panel);
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(dsi->cfg_clk))
> + clk_prepare_enable(dsi->cfg_clk);
> +
> + clk_prepare_enable(dsi->pclk);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_set_mode(dsi, DW_MIPI_DSI_CMD_MODE);
> + drm_panel_unprepare(dsi->panel);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_set_mode(dsi, DW_MIPI_DSI_VID_MODE);
> +
> + /*
> + * This is necessary to make sure the peripheral
> + * will be driven normally when the display is
> + * enabled again later.
> + */
You can use longer lines for comments. No need to split it across three
lines if you can make it fit on two.
> + expire = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(120);
> + while (time_before(jiffies, expire))
> + cpu_relax();
Again, cpu_relax() isn't really relaxing the CPU to the extent that it
might lead you to think. If you know you want to sleep for 120 ms, just
do msleep(120).
> +
> + dw_mipi_dsi_set_mode(dsi, DW_MIPI_DSI_CMD_MODE);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_disable(dsi);
> + clk_disable_unprepare(dsi->pclk);
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(dsi->cfg_clk))
> + clk_disable_unprepare(dsi->cfg_clk);
> +
> + dsi->enabled = false;
> +}
> +
> +static void dw_mipi_dsi_bridge_nope(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
Hehe, perhaps dw_mipi_dsi_bridge_nop()? Or simply leave the function
pointers NULL, but I guess you had to add this because the DRM bridge
infrastructure doesn't allow these to be optional. We might want to
change that.
> +{
> + /* do nothing */
> +}
> +
> +static void dw_mipi_dsi_init(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi)
> +{
> + dsi_write(dsi, DSI_PWR_UP, RESET);
> + dsi_write(dsi, DSI_PHY_RSTZ, PHY_DISFORCEPLL | PHY_DISABLECLK
> + | PHY_RSTZ | PHY_SHUTDOWNZ);
> + dsi_write(dsi, DSI_CLKMGR_CFG, TO_CLK_DIVIDSION(10) |
> + TX_ESC_CLK_DIVIDSION(7));
> + dsi_write(dsi, DSI_LPCLK_CTRL, PHY_TXREQUESTCLKHS);
> +}
> +
> +static void dw_mipi_dsi_dpi_config(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi,
> + struct drm_display_mode *mode)
> +{
> + u32 val = 0, calor = 0;
"color"?
> +static void dw_mipi_dsi_bridge_mode_set(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> + struct drm_display_mode *mode,
> + struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode)
> +{
> + struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi = bridge->driver_private;
> + int ret;
> +
> + dsi->mode = adjusted_mode;
> +
> + ret = dw_mipi_dsi_get_lane_bps(dsi);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return;
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(dsi->cfg_clk))
> + clk_prepare_enable(dsi->cfg_clk);
> +
> + clk_prepare_enable(dsi->pclk);
Again, check errors from clk_prepare_enable(), ...
> + dw_mipi_dsi_init(dsi);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_dpi_config(dsi, mode);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_packet_handler_config(dsi);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_video_mode_config(dsi);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_video_packet_config(dsi, mode);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_command_mode_config(dsi);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_line_timer_config(dsi);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_vertical_timing_config(dsi);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_dphy_timing_config(dsi);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_dphy_interface_config(dsi);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_clear_err(dsi);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_init(dsi);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_wait_for_two_frames(dsi);
> + drm_panel_prepare(dsi->panel);
... and drm_panel_prepare().
> +static struct drm_bridge_funcs dw_mipi_dsi_bridge_funcs = {
static const, please.
> +int dw_mipi_dsi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data,
> + struct drm_encoder *encoder,
> + const struct dw_mipi_dsi_plat_data *pdata)
> +{
[...]
> + dsi->cfg_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "cfg");
> + if (IS_ERR(dsi->cfg_clk))
> + dev_warn(dev, "Have no configuration clock\n");
Is this truly optional?
> + dsi->pclk = devm_clk_get(dev, "pclk");
> + if (IS_ERR(dsi->pclk)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(dsi->pclk);
> + dev_err(dev, "Unable to get configuration clock: %d\n", ret);
pclk doesn't seem to be a "configuration clock".
> + dev_info(dev, "version number is 0x%08x\n", val);
Do you really need this information? What purpose does it serve to have
this in the kernel log?
> diff --git a/include/drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.h b/include/drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..2e351e4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2014-2015 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
> + * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
> + * of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __DW_MIPI_DSI__
> +#define __DW_MIPI_DSI__
> +
> +#include <drm/drmP.h>
> +
> +struct dw_mipi_dsi_plat_data {
> + unsigned int max_data_lanes;
> + enum drm_mode_status (*mode_valid)(struct drm_connector *connector,
> + struct drm_display_mode *mode);
> +};
> +
> +int dw_mipi_dsi_get_encoder_pixel_format(struct drm_encoder *encoder);
> +
> +int dw_mipi_dsi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
> + void *data, struct drm_encoder *encoder,
> + const struct dw_mipi_dsi_plat_data *pdata);
> +void dw_mipi_dsi_unbind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data);
> +#endif /* __DW_MIPI_DSI__ */
Should have a blank line between the two above.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-20 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-20 8:15 [PATCH v4 0/13] Add mipi dsi support for rk3288 Chris Zhong
2015-11-20 8:15 ` Chris Zhong
2015-11-20 8:15 ` Chris Zhong
2015-11-20 8:15 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] clk: rockchip: add id for mipidsi sclk on rk3288 Chris Zhong
2015-11-20 8:15 ` Chris Zhong
2015-11-23 17:29 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-23 17:29 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-20 8:15 ` [PATCH v4 02/13] clk: rockchip: add mipidsi clocks " Chris Zhong
2015-11-20 8:15 ` Chris Zhong
2015-11-20 8:15 ` Chris Zhong
2015-11-20 8:15 ` [PATCH v4 03/13] drm/rockchip: return a true clock rate to adjusted_mode Chris Zhong
2015-11-20 8:15 ` Chris Zhong
2015-11-20 8:15 ` Chris Zhong
2015-11-20 8:57 ` Mark yao
2015-11-20 8:57 ` Mark yao
2015-11-20 8:57 ` Mark yao
2015-11-20 8:15 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] drm/dsi: Add a helper to get bits per pixel of MIPI DSI pixel format Chris Zhong
2015-11-20 8:15 ` Chris Zhong
2015-11-20 8:15 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] Documentation: dt-bindings: Add bindings for Synopsys DW MIPI DSI DRM bridge driver Chris Zhong
2015-11-20 8:15 ` Chris Zhong
2015-11-20 14:32 ` Rob Herring
2015-11-20 14:32 ` Rob Herring
2015-11-20 8:15 ` [PATCH v4 06/13] drm/bridge: Add Synopsys DesignWare MIPI DSI host controller driver Chris Zhong
2015-11-20 8:15 ` Chris Zhong
2015-11-20 16:07 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2015-11-20 16:07 ` Thierry Reding
2015-11-26 7:03 ` Chris Zhong
2015-11-26 7:03 ` Chris Zhong
2015-11-26 8:04 ` Thierry Reding
2015-11-26 8:04 ` Thierry Reding
2015-11-26 10:05 ` Chris Zhong
2015-11-26 10:05 ` Chris Zhong
2015-11-20 8:15 ` [PATCH v4 07/13] drm: rockchip: Support Synopsys DesignWare MIPI DSI host controller Chris Zhong
2015-11-20 8:15 ` Chris Zhong
2015-11-20 8:15 ` Chris Zhong
2015-11-20 8:15 ` [PATCH v4 08/13] Documentation: dt-bindings: Add bindings for rk3288 DW MIPI DSI driver Chris Zhong
2015-11-20 8:15 ` Chris Zhong
2015-11-20 8:15 ` Chris Zhong
2015-11-20 8:15 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] ARM: dts: rockchip: add rk3288 mipi_dsi nodes Chris Zhong
2015-11-20 8:15 ` Chris Zhong
2015-11-20 8:15 ` Chris Zhong
2015-11-20 8:15 ` [PATCH v4 10/13] of: add vendor prefix for boe Chris Zhong
2015-11-20 8:15 ` Chris Zhong
2015-11-23 8:08 ` Thierry Reding
2015-11-23 8:08 ` Thierry Reding
2015-11-20 8:15 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] drm/panel: simple: Add support for BOE TV080WUM-NL0 Chris Zhong
2015-11-20 8:15 ` Chris Zhong
2015-11-23 8:09 ` Thierry Reding
2015-11-23 8:09 ` Thierry Reding
2015-11-20 8:15 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] drm/panel: simple: Add boe, tv080wum-nl0 simple panel device tree binding Chris Zhong
2015-11-20 8:15 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] drm/panel: simple: Add boe,tv080wum-nl0 " Chris Zhong
2015-11-23 8:10 ` Thierry Reding
2015-11-23 8:10 ` Thierry Reding
2015-11-20 8:15 ` [PATCH v4 13/13] ARM: dts: rockchip: add support mipi panel tv080wum-nl0 for rk3288-evb Chris Zhong
2015-11-20 8:15 ` Chris Zhong
2015-11-20 8:15 ` Chris Zhong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151120160706.GE3300@ulmo.nvidia.com \
--to=treding@nvidia.com \
--cc=abrestic@chromium.org \
--cc=ajaykumar.rs@samsung.com \
--cc=andy.yan@rock-chips.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=emil.l.velikov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=rahul.sharma@samsung.com \
--cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=vpalatin@chromium.org \
--cc=zyw@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.