[PATCH v2 0/2] toshiba_acpi: Add WWAN support

[PATCH v2 0/2] toshiba_acpi: Add WWAN support

[Azael Avalos]

These two patches add WWAN support to the driver, the first adds the actual
support functions and the second adds RFKill handler functions to set the
device status according to the killswitch.

Changes since v1:
- Added missing calls to rfkill_unregister and rfkill_destroy functions

Azael Avalos (2):
  toshiba_acpi: Add support for WWAN devices
  toshiba_acpi: Add WWAN RFKill support

 drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c | 171 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 171 insertions(+)

-- 
2.6.2

[PATCH v2 1/2] toshiba_acpi: Add support for WWAN devices

[Azael Avalos]

Toshiba laptops with WWAN devices installed cannot use the device unless
it is attached and powered, similar to how Toshiba Bluetooth devices
work.

This patch adds support to WWAN devices, introducing three functions,
one to query the overall status of the wireless devices (RFKill, WLAN,
BT, WWAN), the second queries WWAN support, and finally the third
(de)activates the device.

Signed-off-by: Fabian Koester <fabian.koester@bringnow.com>
Signed-off-by: Azael Avalos <coproscefalo@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
index c013029..60d1ad9 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
@@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
 #define HCI_VIDEO_OUT			0x001c
 #define HCI_HOTKEY_EVENT		0x001e
 #define HCI_LCD_BRIGHTNESS		0x002a
+#define HCI_WIRELESS			0x0056
 #define HCI_ACCELEROMETER		0x006d
 #define HCI_KBD_ILLUMINATION		0x0095
 #define HCI_ECO_MODE			0x0097
@@ -148,6 +149,10 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
 #define SCI_KBD_MODE_ON			0x8
 #define SCI_KBD_MODE_OFF		0x10
 #define SCI_KBD_TIME_MAX		0x3c001a
+#define HCI_WIRELESS_STATUS		0x1
+#define HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN		0x3
+#define HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_STATUS	0x2000
+#define HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_POWER		0x4000
 #define SCI_USB_CHARGE_MODE_MASK	0xff
 #define SCI_USB_CHARGE_DISABLED		0x00
 #define SCI_USB_CHARGE_ALTERNATE	0x09
@@ -197,12 +202,14 @@ struct toshiba_acpi_dev {
 	unsigned int kbd_function_keys_supported:1;
 	unsigned int panel_power_on_supported:1;
 	unsigned int usb_three_supported:1;
+	unsigned int wwan_supported:1;
 	unsigned int sysfs_created:1;
 	unsigned int special_functions;
 
 	bool kbd_led_registered;
 	bool illumination_led_registered;
 	bool eco_led_registered;
+	bool killswitch;
 };
 
 static struct toshiba_acpi_dev *toshiba_acpi;
@@ -1085,6 +1092,87 @@ static int toshiba_hotkey_event_type_get(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev,
 	return -EIO;
 }
 
+/* Wireless status (RFKill, WLAN, BT, WWAN) */
+static int toshiba_wireless_status(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev)
+{
+	u32 in[TCI_WORDS] = { HCI_GET, HCI_WIRELESS, 0, 0, 0, 0 };
+	u32 out[TCI_WORDS];
+	acpi_status status;
+
+	in[3] = HCI_WIRELESS_STATUS;
+	status = tci_raw(dev, in, out);
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
+		pr_err("ACPI call to get Wireless status failed\n");
+	} else if (out[0] == TOS_NOT_SUPPORTED) {
+		return -ENODEV;
+	} else if (out[0] == TOS_SUCCESS) {
+		dev->killswitch =
+			    (out[2] & HCI_WIRELESS_STATUS) ? true : false;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	return -EIO;
+}
+
+/* WWAN */
+static void toshiba_wwan_available(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev)
+{
+	u32 in[TCI_WORDS] = { HCI_GET, HCI_WIRELESS, 0, 0, 0, 0 };
+	u32 out[TCI_WORDS];
+	acpi_status status;
+
+	dev->wwan_supported = 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * WWAN support can be queried by setting the in[3] value to
+	 * HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN (0x03).
+	 *
+	 * If supported, out[0] contains TOS_SUCCESS and out[2] contains
+	 * HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_STATUS (0x2000).
+	 *
+	 * If not supported, out[0] contains TOS_INPUT_DATA_ERROR (0x8300)
+	 * or TOS_NOT_SUPPORTED (0x8000).
+	 */
+	in[3] = HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN;
+	status = tci_raw(dev, in, out);
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+		pr_err("ACPI call to get WWAN status failed\n");
+	else if (out[0] == TOS_SUCCESS && out[2] == HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_STATUS)
+		dev->wwan_supported = 1;
+}
+
+static int toshiba_wwan_set(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev, u32 state)
+{
+	u32 in[TCI_WORDS] = { HCI_SET, HCI_WIRELESS, state, 0, 0, 0 };
+	u32 out[TCI_WORDS];
+	acpi_status status;
+
+	in[3] = HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_STATUS;
+	status = tci_raw(dev, in, out);
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
+		pr_err("ACPI call to set WWAN status failed\n");
+		return -EIO;
+	} else if (out[0] == TOS_NOT_SUPPORTED) {
+		return -ENODEV;
+	} else if (out[0] != TOS_SUCCESS) {
+		return -EIO;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Some devices only need to call HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_STATUS to
+	 * (de)activate the device, but some others need the
+	 * HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_POWER call as well.
+	 */
+	in[3] = HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_POWER;
+	status = tci_raw(dev, in, out);
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+		pr_err("ACPI call to set WWAN power failed\n");
+	else if (out[0] == TOS_NOT_SUPPORTED)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	return out[0] == TOS_SUCCESS ? 0 : -EIO;
+}
+
 /* Transflective Backlight */
 static int get_tr_backlight_status(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev, u32 *status)
 {
@@ -2561,6 +2649,8 @@ static void print_supported_features(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev)
 		pr_cont(" panel-power-on");
 	if (dev->usb_three_supported)
 		pr_cont(" usb3");
+	if (dev->wwan_supported)
+		pr_cont(" wwan");
 
 	pr_cont("\n");
 }
@@ -2736,6 +2826,8 @@ static int toshiba_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *acpi_dev)
 	ret = get_fan_status(dev, &dummy);
 	dev->fan_supported = !ret;
 
+	toshiba_wwan_available(dev);
+
 	print_supported_features(dev);
 
 	ret = sysfs_create_group(&dev->acpi_dev->dev.kobj,
-- 
2.6.2

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] toshiba_acpi: Add support for WWAN devices

[Darren Hart]

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 08:49:24AM -0700, Azael Avalos wrote:
> Toshiba laptops with WWAN devices installed cannot use the device unless
> it is attached and powered, similar to how Toshiba Bluetooth devices
> work.
> 
> This patch adds support to WWAN devices, introducing three functions,
> one to query the overall status of the wireless devices (RFKill, WLAN,
> BT, WWAN), the second queries WWAN support, and finally the third
> (de)activates the device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Koester <fabian.koester@bringnow.com>
> Signed-off-by: Azael Avalos <coproscefalo@gmail.com>

Thanks Azael,

A few comments on code flow and one bug I think below.

> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 92 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
> index c013029..60d1ad9 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
> @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>  #define HCI_VIDEO_OUT			0x001c
>  #define HCI_HOTKEY_EVENT		0x001e
>  #define HCI_LCD_BRIGHTNESS		0x002a
> +#define HCI_WIRELESS			0x0056
>  #define HCI_ACCELEROMETER		0x006d
>  #define HCI_KBD_ILLUMINATION		0x0095
>  #define HCI_ECO_MODE			0x0097
> @@ -148,6 +149,10 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>  #define SCI_KBD_MODE_ON			0x8
>  #define SCI_KBD_MODE_OFF		0x10
>  #define SCI_KBD_TIME_MAX		0x3c001a
> +#define HCI_WIRELESS_STATUS		0x1
> +#define HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN		0x3
> +#define HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_STATUS	0x2000
> +#define HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_POWER		0x4000
>  #define SCI_USB_CHARGE_MODE_MASK	0xff
>  #define SCI_USB_CHARGE_DISABLED		0x00
>  #define SCI_USB_CHARGE_ALTERNATE	0x09
> @@ -197,12 +202,14 @@ struct toshiba_acpi_dev {
>  	unsigned int kbd_function_keys_supported:1;
>  	unsigned int panel_power_on_supported:1;
>  	unsigned int usb_three_supported:1;
> +	unsigned int wwan_supported:1;
>  	unsigned int sysfs_created:1;
>  	unsigned int special_functions;
>  
>  	bool kbd_led_registered;
>  	bool illumination_led_registered;
>  	bool eco_led_registered;
> +	bool killswitch;
>  };
>  
>  static struct toshiba_acpi_dev *toshiba_acpi;
> @@ -1085,6 +1092,87 @@ static int toshiba_hotkey_event_type_get(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev,
>  	return -EIO;
>  }
>  
> +/* Wireless status (RFKill, WLAN, BT, WWAN) */
> +static int toshiba_wireless_status(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	u32 in[TCI_WORDS] = { HCI_GET, HCI_WIRELESS, 0, 0, 0, 0 };
> +	u32 out[TCI_WORDS];
> +	acpi_status status;
> +
> +	in[3] = HCI_WIRELESS_STATUS;
> +	status = tci_raw(dev, in, out);
> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> +		pr_err("ACPI call to get Wireless status failed\n");
> +	} else if (out[0] == TOS_NOT_SUPPORTED) {
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +	} else if (out[0] == TOS_SUCCESS) {
> +		dev->killswitch =
> +			    (out[2] & HCI_WIRELESS_STATUS) ? true : false;

This should assign successfully without the need for the ternary operator. You
can also then drop the extra newline. You can always use:

!!(out[2] & HCI_WIRELESS_STATUS)

To ensure a 1 or 0 assignment.

> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	return -EIO;

Also, we should be testing for error and do the expected path outside the if
blocks.


	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) {
		pr_err("ACPI call to get Wireless status failed\n");
		return -EIO;
	}

	if (out[0] == TOS_NOT_SUPPORTED)
		return -ENODEV;
	
	if (out[0] != TOS_SUCCESS)
		return -EIO;
	
	dev->killswitch = !!(out[2] & HCI_WIRELESS_STATUS);

	return 0;

> +}
> +
> +/* WWAN */
> +static void toshiba_wwan_available(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	u32 in[TCI_WORDS] = { HCI_GET, HCI_WIRELESS, 0, 0, 0, 0 };
> +	u32 out[TCI_WORDS];
> +	acpi_status status;
> +
> +	dev->wwan_supported = 0;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * WWAN support can be queried by setting the in[3] value to
> +	 * HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN (0x03).
> +	 *
> +	 * If supported, out[0] contains TOS_SUCCESS and out[2] contains
> +	 * HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_STATUS (0x2000).
> +	 *
> +	 * If not supported, out[0] contains TOS_INPUT_DATA_ERROR (0x8300)
> +	 * or TOS_NOT_SUPPORTED (0x8000).
> +	 */
> +	in[3] = HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN;
> +	status = tci_raw(dev, in, out);
> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> +		pr_err("ACPI call to get WWAN status failed\n");
> +	else if (out[0] == TOS_SUCCESS && out[2] == HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_STATUS)
> +		dev->wwan_supported = 1;

This block similarly intermixes error checking with the primary functional
logic, making it less legible in my opinion. Consider:


	in[3] = HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN;
	status = tci_raw(dev, in, out);

	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || (out[0] != TOS_SUCCESS)) {
		pr_err("ACPI call to get WWAN status failed\n");
		return;
	}

	dev->wwan_supported = (out[2] == HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_STATUS);

> +}
> +
> +static int toshiba_wwan_set(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev, u32 state)
> +{
> +	u32 in[TCI_WORDS] = { HCI_SET, HCI_WIRELESS, state, 0, 0, 0 };
> +	u32 out[TCI_WORDS];
> +	acpi_status status;
> +
> +	in[3] = HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_STATUS;
> +	status = tci_raw(dev, in, out);
> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> +		pr_err("ACPI call to set WWAN status failed\n");
> +		return -EIO;
> +	} else if (out[0] == TOS_NOT_SUPPORTED) {
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +	} else if (out[0] != TOS_SUCCESS) {
> +		return -EIO;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Some devices only need to call HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_STATUS to
> +	 * (de)activate the device, but some others need the
> +	 * HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_POWER call as well.
> +	 */
> +	in[3] = HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_POWER;
> +	status = tci_raw(dev, in, out);
> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> +		pr_err("ACPI call to set WWAN power failed\n");

I believe you want a return -EIO here?

> +	else if (out[0] == TOS_NOT_SUPPORTED)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	return out[0] == TOS_SUCCESS ? 0 : -EIO;

So much ternary! :-) I suppose this one is OK.

> +}
> +
>  /* Transflective Backlight */
>  static int get_tr_backlight_status(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev, u32 *status)
>  {
> @@ -2561,6 +2649,8 @@ static void print_supported_features(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev)
>  		pr_cont(" panel-power-on");
>  	if (dev->usb_three_supported)
>  		pr_cont(" usb3");
> +	if (dev->wwan_supported)
> +		pr_cont(" wwan");
>  
>  	pr_cont("\n");
>  }
> @@ -2736,6 +2826,8 @@ static int toshiba_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *acpi_dev)
>  	ret = get_fan_status(dev, &dummy);
>  	dev->fan_supported = !ret;
>  
> +	toshiba_wwan_available(dev);
> +
>  	print_supported_features(dev);
>  
>  	ret = sysfs_create_group(&dev->acpi_dev->dev.kobj,
> -- 
> 2.6.2
> 
> 

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] toshiba_acpi: Add support for WWAN devices

[Azael Avalos]

Hi Darren,

2015-11-20 15:49 GMT-07:00 Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 08:49:24AM -0700, Azael Avalos wrote:
>> Toshiba laptops with WWAN devices installed cannot use the device unless
>> it is attached and powered, similar to how Toshiba Bluetooth devices
>> work.
>>
>> This patch adds support to WWAN devices, introducing three functions,
>> one to query the overall status of the wireless devices (RFKill, WLAN,
>> BT, WWAN), the second queries WWAN support, and finally the third
>> (de)activates the device.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fabian Koester <fabian.koester@bringnow.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Azael Avalos <coproscefalo@gmail.com>
>
> Thanks Azael,
>
> A few comments on code flow and one bug I think below.
>
>> ---
>>  drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 92 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
>> index c013029..60d1ad9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
>> @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>>  #define HCI_VIDEO_OUT                        0x001c
>>  #define HCI_HOTKEY_EVENT             0x001e
>>  #define HCI_LCD_BRIGHTNESS           0x002a
>> +#define HCI_WIRELESS                 0x0056
>>  #define HCI_ACCELEROMETER            0x006d
>>  #define HCI_KBD_ILLUMINATION         0x0095
>>  #define HCI_ECO_MODE                 0x0097
>> @@ -148,6 +149,10 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>>  #define SCI_KBD_MODE_ON                      0x8
>>  #define SCI_KBD_MODE_OFF             0x10
>>  #define SCI_KBD_TIME_MAX             0x3c001a
>> +#define HCI_WIRELESS_STATUS          0x1
>> +#define HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN            0x3
>> +#define HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_STATUS     0x2000
>> +#define HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_POWER              0x4000
>>  #define SCI_USB_CHARGE_MODE_MASK     0xff
>>  #define SCI_USB_CHARGE_DISABLED              0x00
>>  #define SCI_USB_CHARGE_ALTERNATE     0x09
>> @@ -197,12 +202,14 @@ struct toshiba_acpi_dev {
>>       unsigned int kbd_function_keys_supported:1;
>>       unsigned int panel_power_on_supported:1;
>>       unsigned int usb_three_supported:1;
>> +     unsigned int wwan_supported:1;
>>       unsigned int sysfs_created:1;
>>       unsigned int special_functions;
>>
>>       bool kbd_led_registered;
>>       bool illumination_led_registered;
>>       bool eco_led_registered;
>> +     bool killswitch;
>>  };
>>
>>  static struct toshiba_acpi_dev *toshiba_acpi;
>> @@ -1085,6 +1092,87 @@ static int toshiba_hotkey_event_type_get(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev,
>>       return -EIO;
>>  }
>>
>> +/* Wireless status (RFKill, WLAN, BT, WWAN) */
>> +static int toshiba_wireless_status(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> +     u32 in[TCI_WORDS] = { HCI_GET, HCI_WIRELESS, 0, 0, 0, 0 };
>> +     u32 out[TCI_WORDS];
>> +     acpi_status status;
>> +
>> +     in[3] = HCI_WIRELESS_STATUS;
>> +     status = tci_raw(dev, in, out);
>> +     if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
>> +             pr_err("ACPI call to get Wireless status failed\n");
>> +     } else if (out[0] == TOS_NOT_SUPPORTED) {
>> +             return -ENODEV;
>> +     } else if (out[0] == TOS_SUCCESS) {
>> +             dev->killswitch =
>> +                         (out[2] & HCI_WIRELESS_STATUS) ? true : false;
>
> This should assign successfully without the need for the ternary operator. You
> can also then drop the extra newline. You can always use:
>
> !!(out[2] & HCI_WIRELESS_STATUS)
>
> To ensure a 1 or 0 assignment.

OK, will change on v3.

>
>> +             return 0;
>> +     }
>> +
>> +     return -EIO;
>
> Also, we should be testing for error and do the expected path outside the if
> blocks.
>
>
>         if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) {
>                 pr_err("ACPI call to get Wireless status failed\n");
>                 return -EIO;
>         }
>
>         if (out[0] == TOS_NOT_SUPPORTED)
>                 return -ENODEV;
>
>         if (out[0] != TOS_SUCCESS)
>                 return -EIO;
>
>         dev->killswitch = !!(out[2] & HCI_WIRELESS_STATUS);
>
>         return 0;
>

OK, will change the functions to this style on v3.

>> +}
>> +
>> +/* WWAN */
>> +static void toshiba_wwan_available(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> +     u32 in[TCI_WORDS] = { HCI_GET, HCI_WIRELESS, 0, 0, 0, 0 };
>> +     u32 out[TCI_WORDS];
>> +     acpi_status status;
>> +
>> +     dev->wwan_supported = 0;
>> +
>> +     /*
>> +      * WWAN support can be queried by setting the in[3] value to
>> +      * HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN (0x03).
>> +      *
>> +      * If supported, out[0] contains TOS_SUCCESS and out[2] contains
>> +      * HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_STATUS (0x2000).
>> +      *
>> +      * If not supported, out[0] contains TOS_INPUT_DATA_ERROR (0x8300)
>> +      * or TOS_NOT_SUPPORTED (0x8000).
>> +      */
>> +     in[3] = HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN;
>> +     status = tci_raw(dev, in, out);
>> +     if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>> +             pr_err("ACPI call to get WWAN status failed\n");
>> +     else if (out[0] == TOS_SUCCESS && out[2] == HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_STATUS)
>> +             dev->wwan_supported = 1;
>
> This block similarly intermixes error checking with the primary functional
> logic, making it less legible in my opinion. Consider:
>
>
>         in[3] = HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN;
>         status = tci_raw(dev, in, out);
>
>         if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || (out[0] != TOS_SUCCESS)) {
>                 pr_err("ACPI call to get WWAN status failed\n");
>                 return;
>         }
>
>         dev->wwan_supported = (out[2] == HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_STATUS);
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int toshiba_wwan_set(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev, u32 state)
>> +{
>> +     u32 in[TCI_WORDS] = { HCI_SET, HCI_WIRELESS, state, 0, 0, 0 };
>> +     u32 out[TCI_WORDS];
>> +     acpi_status status;
>> +
>> +     in[3] = HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_STATUS;
>> +     status = tci_raw(dev, in, out);
>> +     if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
>> +             pr_err("ACPI call to set WWAN status failed\n");
>> +             return -EIO;
>> +     } else if (out[0] == TOS_NOT_SUPPORTED) {
>> +             return -ENODEV;
>> +     } else if (out[0] != TOS_SUCCESS) {
>> +             return -EIO;
>> +     }
>> +
>> +     /*
>> +      * Some devices only need to call HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_STATUS to
>> +      * (de)activate the device, but some others need the
>> +      * HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_POWER call as well.
>> +      */
>> +     in[3] = HCI_WIRELESS_WWAN_POWER;
>> +     status = tci_raw(dev, in, out);
>> +     if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>> +             pr_err("ACPI call to set WWAN power failed\n");
>
> I believe you want a return -EIO here?
>

Yes, and actually, I think the whole driver functions are like this,
I'll check once
I get back home and send a separate patch for this issue.

>> +     else if (out[0] == TOS_NOT_SUPPORTED)
>> +             return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> +     return out[0] == TOS_SUCCESS ? 0 : -EIO;
>
> So much ternary! :-) I suppose this one is OK.


Alright, once I get back home I'll update these patches according
to your comments and send a v3.


Cheers
Azael


-- 
-- El mundo apesta y vosotros apestais tambien --

[PATCH v2 2/2] toshiba_acpi: Add WWAN RFKill support

[Azael Avalos]

A previuos patch added WWAN support to the driver, allowing to query
and set the device status.

This patch adds RFKill support for the recently introduced WWAN device,
making use of the WWAN and *wireless_status functions to query the
killswitch and (de)activate the device accordingly to its status.

Signed-off-by: Fabian Koester <fabian.koester@bringnow.com>
Signed-off-by: Azael Avalos <coproscefalo@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
index 60d1ad9..d1315c5 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
 #include <linux/dmi.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include <linux/miscdevice.h>
+#include <linux/rfkill.h>
 #include <linux/toshiba.h>
 #include <acpi/video.h>
 
@@ -174,6 +175,7 @@ struct toshiba_acpi_dev {
 	struct led_classdev kbd_led;
 	struct led_classdev eco_led;
 	struct miscdevice miscdev;
+	struct rfkill *wwan_rfk;
 
 	int force_fan;
 	int last_key_event;
@@ -2330,6 +2332,67 @@ static const struct file_operations toshiba_acpi_fops = {
 };
 
 /*
+ * WWAN RFKill handlers
+ */
+static int toshiba_acpi_wwan_set_block(void *data, bool blocked)
+{
+	struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev = data;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = toshiba_wireless_status(dev);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (!dev->killswitch)
+		return 0;
+
+	return toshiba_wwan_set(dev, blocked ? 0 : 1);
+}
+
+static void toshiba_acpi_wwan_poll(struct rfkill *rfkill, void *data)
+{
+	struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev = data;
+
+	if (toshiba_wireless_status(dev))
+		return;
+
+	rfkill_set_hw_state(dev->wwan_rfk, !dev->killswitch);
+}
+
+static const struct rfkill_ops wwan_rfk_ops = {
+	.set_block = toshiba_acpi_wwan_set_block,
+	.poll = toshiba_acpi_wwan_poll,
+};
+
+static int toshiba_acpi_setup_wwan_rfkill(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev)
+{
+	int ret = toshiba_wireless_status(dev);
+
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	dev->wwan_rfk = rfkill_alloc("Toshiba WWAN",
+				     &dev->acpi_dev->dev,
+				     RFKILL_TYPE_WWAN,
+				     &wwan_rfk_ops,
+				     dev);
+	if (!dev->wwan_rfk) {
+		pr_err("Unable to allocate WWAN rfkill device\n");
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	rfkill_set_hw_state(dev->wwan_rfk, !dev->killswitch);
+
+	ret = rfkill_register(dev->wwan_rfk);
+	if (ret) {
+		pr_err("Unable to register WWAN rfkill device\n");
+		rfkill_destroy(dev->wwan_rfk);
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+/*
  * Hotkeys
  */
 static int toshiba_acpi_enable_hotkeys(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev)
@@ -2688,6 +2751,11 @@ static int toshiba_acpi_remove(struct acpi_device *acpi_dev)
 	if (dev->eco_led_registered)
 		led_classdev_unregister(&dev->eco_led);
 
+	if (dev->wwan_rfk) {
+		rfkill_unregister(dev->wwan_rfk);
+		rfkill_destroy(dev->wwan_rfk);
+	}
+
 	if (toshiba_acpi)
 		toshiba_acpi = NULL;
 
@@ -2827,6 +2895,8 @@ static int toshiba_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *acpi_dev)
 	dev->fan_supported = !ret;
 
 	toshiba_wwan_available(dev);
+	if (dev->wwan_supported)
+		toshiba_acpi_setup_wwan_rfkill(dev);
 
 	print_supported_features(dev);
 
@@ -2930,6 +3000,15 @@ static int toshiba_acpi_resume(struct device *device)
 			pr_info("Unable to re-enable hotkeys\n");
 	}
 
+	if (dev->wwan_rfk) {
+		int error = toshiba_wireless_status(dev);
+
+		if (error)
+			return error;
+
+		rfkill_set_hw_state(dev->wwan_rfk, !dev->killswitch);
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 #endif
-- 
2.6.2

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] toshiba_acpi: Add WWAN RFKill support

[Darren Hart]

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 08:49:25AM -0700, Azael Avalos wrote:

Hi Azael,

> A previuos patch added WWAN support to the driver, allowing to query
> and set the device status.
> 
> This patch adds RFKill support for the recently introduced WWAN device,
> making use of the WWAN and *wireless_status functions to query the
> killswitch and (de)activate the device accordingly to its status.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Koester <fabian.koester@bringnow.com>

So this is Fabian's code which he sent to you and you are submitting on his
behalf?

> Signed-off-by: Azael Avalos <coproscefalo@gmail.com>


A couple minor nits below.

> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
> index 60d1ad9..d1315c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
>  #include <linux/dmi.h>
>  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>  #include <linux/miscdevice.h>
> +#include <linux/rfkill.h>
>  #include <linux/toshiba.h>
>  #include <acpi/video.h>
>  
> @@ -174,6 +175,7 @@ struct toshiba_acpi_dev {
>  	struct led_classdev kbd_led;
>  	struct led_classdev eco_led;
>  	struct miscdevice miscdev;
> +	struct rfkill *wwan_rfk;
>  
>  	int force_fan;
>  	int last_key_event;
> @@ -2330,6 +2332,67 @@ static const struct file_operations toshiba_acpi_fops = {
>  };
>  
>  /*
> + * WWAN RFKill handlers
> + */
> +static int toshiba_acpi_wwan_set_block(void *data, bool blocked)
> +{
> +	struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev = data;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = toshiba_wireless_status(dev);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	if (!dev->killswitch)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return toshiba_wwan_set(dev, blocked ? 0 : 1);

You can avoid the ternary operation with binary output and just invert the
bool.

!blocked


> +}
> +
> +static void toshiba_acpi_wwan_poll(struct rfkill *rfkill, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev = data;
> +
> +	if (toshiba_wireless_status(dev))
> +		return;
> +
> +	rfkill_set_hw_state(dev->wwan_rfk, !dev->killswitch);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct rfkill_ops wwan_rfk_ops = {
> +	.set_block = toshiba_acpi_wwan_set_block,
> +	.poll = toshiba_acpi_wwan_poll,
> +};
> +
> +static int toshiba_acpi_setup_wwan_rfkill(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	int ret = toshiba_wireless_status(dev);
> +
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	dev->wwan_rfk = rfkill_alloc("Toshiba WWAN",
> +				     &dev->acpi_dev->dev,
> +				     RFKILL_TYPE_WWAN,
> +				     &wwan_rfk_ops,
> +				     dev);
> +	if (!dev->wwan_rfk) {
> +		pr_err("Unable to allocate WWAN rfkill device\n");
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	rfkill_set_hw_state(dev->wwan_rfk, !dev->killswitch);
> +
> +	ret = rfkill_register(dev->wwan_rfk);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		pr_err("Unable to register WWAN rfkill device\n");
> +		rfkill_destroy(dev->wwan_rfk);
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
>   * Hotkeys
>   */
>  static int toshiba_acpi_enable_hotkeys(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev)
> @@ -2688,6 +2751,11 @@ static int toshiba_acpi_remove(struct acpi_device *acpi_dev)
>  	if (dev->eco_led_registered)
>  		led_classdev_unregister(&dev->eco_led);
>  
> +	if (dev->wwan_rfk) {
> +		rfkill_unregister(dev->wwan_rfk);
> +		rfkill_destroy(dev->wwan_rfk);
> +	}
> +
>  	if (toshiba_acpi)
>  		toshiba_acpi = NULL;
>  
> @@ -2827,6 +2895,8 @@ static int toshiba_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *acpi_dev)
>  	dev->fan_supported = !ret;
>  
>  	toshiba_wwan_available(dev);
> +	if (dev->wwan_supported)
> +		toshiba_acpi_setup_wwan_rfkill(dev);
>  
>  	print_supported_features(dev);
>  
> @@ -2930,6 +3000,15 @@ static int toshiba_acpi_resume(struct device *device)
>  			pr_info("Unable to re-enable hotkeys\n");
>  	}
>  
> +	if (dev->wwan_rfk) {
> +		int error = toshiba_wireless_status(dev);
> +
> +		if (error)
> +			return error;

For consistency, please use ret. You can just initialize it to 0 outside the if
block, use it inside, and return it outside as well. We don't buy much by
declaring inside the if block on a resume function.

> +
> +		rfkill_set_hw_state(dev->wwan_rfk, !dev->killswitch);
> +	}
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  #endif
> -- 
> 2.6.2
> 
> 

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] toshiba_acpi: Add WWAN RFKill support

[Azael Avalos]

Hi Darren,

2015-11-20 15:50 GMT-07:00 Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 08:49:25AM -0700, Azael Avalos wrote:
>
> Hi Azael,
>
>> A previuos patch added WWAN support to the driver, allowing to query
>> and set the device status.
>>
>> This patch adds RFKill support for the recently introduced WWAN device,
>> making use of the WWAN and *wireless_status functions to query the
>> killswitch and (de)activate the device accordingly to its status.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fabian Koester <fabian.koester@bringnow.com>
>
> So this is Fabian's code which he sent to you and you are submitting on his
> behalf?

Yes, he sent me the code for review, but made some changes to the
actual code he sent me (mostly patch 01), sent back to him the resulting
changes for testing, and I told him I was gonna submmit the changes :-)

>
>> Signed-off-by: Azael Avalos <coproscefalo@gmail.com>
>
>
> A couple minor nits below.
>
>> ---
>>  drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
>> index 60d1ad9..d1315c5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
>> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/dmi.h>
>>  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>>  #include <linux/miscdevice.h>
>> +#include <linux/rfkill.h>
>>  #include <linux/toshiba.h>
>>  #include <acpi/video.h>
>>
>> @@ -174,6 +175,7 @@ struct toshiba_acpi_dev {
>>       struct led_classdev kbd_led;
>>       struct led_classdev eco_led;
>>       struct miscdevice miscdev;
>> +     struct rfkill *wwan_rfk;
>>
>>       int force_fan;
>>       int last_key_event;
>> @@ -2330,6 +2332,67 @@ static const struct file_operations toshiba_acpi_fops = {
>>  };
>>
>>  /*
>> + * WWAN RFKill handlers
>> + */
>> +static int toshiba_acpi_wwan_set_block(void *data, bool blocked)
>> +{
>> +     struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev = data;
>> +     int ret;
>> +
>> +     ret = toshiba_wireless_status(dev);
>> +     if (ret)
>> +             return ret;
>> +
>> +     if (!dev->killswitch)
>> +             return 0;
>> +
>> +     return toshiba_wwan_set(dev, blocked ? 0 : 1);
>
> You can avoid the ternary operation with binary output and just invert the
> bool.
>
> !blocked

OK, will do.

>
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void toshiba_acpi_wwan_poll(struct rfkill *rfkill, void *data)
>> +{
>> +     struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev = data;
>> +
>> +     if (toshiba_wireless_status(dev))
>> +             return;
>> +
>> +     rfkill_set_hw_state(dev->wwan_rfk, !dev->killswitch);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct rfkill_ops wwan_rfk_ops = {
>> +     .set_block = toshiba_acpi_wwan_set_block,
>> +     .poll = toshiba_acpi_wwan_poll,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int toshiba_acpi_setup_wwan_rfkill(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> +     int ret = toshiba_wireless_status(dev);
>> +
>> +     if (ret)
>> +             return ret;
>> +
>> +     dev->wwan_rfk = rfkill_alloc("Toshiba WWAN",
>> +                                  &dev->acpi_dev->dev,
>> +                                  RFKILL_TYPE_WWAN,
>> +                                  &wwan_rfk_ops,
>> +                                  dev);
>> +     if (!dev->wwan_rfk) {
>> +             pr_err("Unable to allocate WWAN rfkill device\n");
>> +             return -ENOMEM;
>> +     }
>> +
>> +     rfkill_set_hw_state(dev->wwan_rfk, !dev->killswitch);
>> +
>> +     ret = rfkill_register(dev->wwan_rfk);
>> +     if (ret) {
>> +             pr_err("Unable to register WWAN rfkill device\n");
>> +             rfkill_destroy(dev->wwan_rfk);
>> +     }
>> +
>> +     return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>>   * Hotkeys
>>   */
>>  static int toshiba_acpi_enable_hotkeys(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev)
>> @@ -2688,6 +2751,11 @@ static int toshiba_acpi_remove(struct acpi_device *acpi_dev)
>>       if (dev->eco_led_registered)
>>               led_classdev_unregister(&dev->eco_led);
>>
>> +     if (dev->wwan_rfk) {
>> +             rfkill_unregister(dev->wwan_rfk);
>> +             rfkill_destroy(dev->wwan_rfk);
>> +     }
>> +
>>       if (toshiba_acpi)
>>               toshiba_acpi = NULL;
>>
>> @@ -2827,6 +2895,8 @@ static int toshiba_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *acpi_dev)
>>       dev->fan_supported = !ret;
>>
>>       toshiba_wwan_available(dev);
>> +     if (dev->wwan_supported)
>> +             toshiba_acpi_setup_wwan_rfkill(dev);
>>
>>       print_supported_features(dev);
>>
>> @@ -2930,6 +3000,15 @@ static int toshiba_acpi_resume(struct device *device)
>>                       pr_info("Unable to re-enable hotkeys\n");
>>       }
>>
>> +     if (dev->wwan_rfk) {
>> +             int error = toshiba_wireless_status(dev);
>> +
>> +             if (error)
>> +                     return error;
>
> For consistency, please use ret. You can just initialize it to 0 outside the if
> block, use it inside, and return it outside as well. We don't buy much by
> declaring inside the if block on a resume function.

Here "error" was used on the previous if, that's why I chose the same name,

I will rename the variable to "ret" for consistency and adapt the
function on v3.

>
>> +
>> +             rfkill_set_hw_state(dev->wwan_rfk, !dev->killswitch);
>> +     }
>> +
>>       return 0;
>>  }
>>  #endif
>> --
>> 2.6.2
>>
>>
>
> --
> Darren Hart
> Intel Open Source Technology Center


Cheers
Azael


-- 
-- El mundo apesta y vosotros apestais tambien --