All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: Marcus Weseloh <mweseloh42-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Julian Calaby
	<julian.calaby-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	Ian Campbell
	<ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org>,
	Kumar Gala <galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	devicetree <devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	"Mailing List,
	Arm"
	<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: dts: sun4i: Add support for inter-word wait cycles using the SPI Wait Clock Register
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 20:45:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151122194556.GO32142@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGNoLaPLXOmObXgW0YsN8giM1WCRDn7MieTBcKOE5sjXbjg0GA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1334 bytes --]

Hi,

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 05:45:48PM +0100, Marcus Weseloh wrote:
> 2015-11-20 17:12 GMT+01:00 Rob Herring <robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>:
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:56:34PM +0100, Marcus Weseloh wrote:
> >> > (and the wdelay should
> >> > arguably be a core-spi thing, not a sunxi thing, but that's a separate
> >> > discussion)
> >>
> >> I've been thinking about that, but it seemed to big a change to
> >> attempt with my limited kernel hacking experience.
> >
> > It is not any bigger. You just need to document it in the core binding.
> > It would still be read by the drivers using it.
> 
> Julien, Rob: thanks for your comments! Ok, I will make the following changes:
> 
> - remove "sun4i,spi-wdelay" from the sun4i binding and add the
> property to the spi-bus.txt binding instead
> - remove the comment about the additional 3 cycles from the documentation
> - modfy the spi-sun4i driver to take care of the minimum 3 cycle period
> 
> Does that sound right?
> 
> And maybe I could also use a more descriptive name for the property,
> maybe "spi-word-wait-cycles"?

I don't think it should be in a clock-rate dependant unit. Using micro
or nano-seconds would be more appropriate I guess.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH] spi: dts: sun4i: Add support for inter-word wait cycles using the SPI Wait Clock Register
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 20:45:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151122194556.GO32142@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGNoLaPLXOmObXgW0YsN8giM1WCRDn7MieTBcKOE5sjXbjg0GA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 05:45:48PM +0100, Marcus Weseloh wrote:
> 2015-11-20 17:12 GMT+01:00 Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>:
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:56:34PM +0100, Marcus Weseloh wrote:
> >> > (and the wdelay should
> >> > arguably be a core-spi thing, not a sunxi thing, but that's a separate
> >> > discussion)
> >>
> >> I've been thinking about that, but it seemed to big a change to
> >> attempt with my limited kernel hacking experience.
> >
> > It is not any bigger. You just need to document it in the core binding.
> > It would still be read by the drivers using it.
> 
> Julien, Rob: thanks for your comments! Ok, I will make the following changes:
> 
> - remove "sun4i,spi-wdelay" from the sun4i binding and add the
> property to the spi-bus.txt binding instead
> - remove the comment about the additional 3 cycles from the documentation
> - modfy the spi-sun4i driver to take care of the minimum 3 cycle period
> 
> Does that sound right?
> 
> And maybe I could also use a more descriptive name for the property,
> maybe "spi-word-wait-cycles"?

I don't think it should be in a clock-rate dependant unit. Using micro
or nano-seconds would be more appropriate I guess.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20151122/c8e5db67/attachment.sig>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
To: Marcus Weseloh <mweseloh42@gmail.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@gmail.com>,
	linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Mailing List, Arm" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-spi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH] spi: dts: sun4i: Add support for inter-word wait cycles using the SPI Wait Clock Register
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 20:45:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151122194556.GO32142@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGNoLaPLXOmObXgW0YsN8giM1WCRDn7MieTBcKOE5sjXbjg0GA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1342 bytes --]

Hi,

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 05:45:48PM +0100, Marcus Weseloh wrote:
> 2015-11-20 17:12 GMT+01:00 Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>:
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:56:34PM +0100, Marcus Weseloh wrote:
> >> > (and the wdelay should
> >> > arguably be a core-spi thing, not a sunxi thing, but that's a separate
> >> > discussion)
> >>
> >> I've been thinking about that, but it seemed to big a change to
> >> attempt with my limited kernel hacking experience.
> >
> > It is not any bigger. You just need to document it in the core binding.
> > It would still be read by the drivers using it.
> 
> Julien, Rob: thanks for your comments! Ok, I will make the following changes:
> 
> - remove "sun4i,spi-wdelay" from the sun4i binding and add the
> property to the spi-bus.txt binding instead
> - remove the comment about the additional 3 cycles from the documentation
> - modfy the spi-sun4i driver to take care of the minimum 3 cycle period
> 
> Does that sound right?
> 
> And maybe I could also use a more descriptive name for the property,
> maybe "spi-word-wait-cycles"?

I don't think it should be in a clock-rate dependant unit. Using micro
or nano-seconds would be more appropriate I guess.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-11-22 19:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-19 15:53 [PATCH] spi: dts: sun4i: Add support for inter-word wait cycles Marcus Weseloh
2015-11-19 15:53 ` Marcus Weseloh
2015-11-19 15:53 ` Marcus Weseloh
     [not found] ` <1447948422-4915-1-git-send-email-mweseloh42-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-11-19 15:53   ` [PATCH] spi: dts: sun4i: Add support for inter-word wait cycles using the SPI Wait Clock Register Marcus Weseloh
2015-11-19 15:53     ` Marcus Weseloh
2015-11-19 15:53     ` Marcus Weseloh
     [not found]     ` <1447948422-4915-2-git-send-email-mweseloh42-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-11-19 22:59       ` [linux-sunxi] " Julian Calaby
2015-11-19 22:59         ` Julian Calaby
2015-11-19 22:59         ` Julian Calaby
     [not found]         ` <CAGRGNgWQLE5h03+4shLmqD6iW_p=L-i3ewdLb8ndWpxGHWh4rQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-11-20  8:45           ` Marcus Weseloh
2015-11-20  8:45             ` [linux-sunxi] " Marcus Weseloh
2015-11-20  8:45             ` Marcus Weseloh
     [not found]             ` <CAGNoLaNhD73N5_1_NbkvRFnwNqO5ehQBTyeCEgzFVgWCrJZmWQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-11-20 10:12               ` Julian Calaby
2015-11-20 10:12                 ` [linux-sunxi] " Julian Calaby
2015-11-20 10:12                 ` Julian Calaby
     [not found]                 ` <CAGRGNgV0kOkye-Zu4WGQKgGim7N2HB9rAFJ3HNQS89Rr6_WexQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-11-20 13:56                   ` Marcus Weseloh
2015-11-20 13:56                     ` [linux-sunxi] " Marcus Weseloh
2015-11-20 13:56                     ` Marcus Weseloh
     [not found]                     ` <CAGNoLaOOz2ACtS5iRUxjOknisMHm2Ow3OVsLkqpWuNU4J-9v-A-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-11-20 16:12                       ` Rob Herring
2015-11-20 16:12                         ` [linux-sunxi] " Rob Herring
2015-11-20 16:12                         ` Rob Herring
2015-11-20 16:45                         ` Marcus Weseloh
2015-11-20 16:45                           ` [linux-sunxi] " Marcus Weseloh
2015-11-20 16:45                           ` Marcus Weseloh
     [not found]                           ` <CAGNoLaPLXOmObXgW0YsN8giM1WCRDn7MieTBcKOE5sjXbjg0GA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-11-22 19:45                             ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2015-11-22 19:45                               ` Maxime Ripard
2015-11-22 19:45                               ` Maxime Ripard
2015-11-23  9:14                               ` Marcus Weseloh
2015-11-23  9:14                                 ` [linux-sunxi] " Marcus Weseloh
2015-11-23  9:14                                 ` Marcus Weseloh
2015-11-20 16:03       ` Rob Herring
2015-11-20 16:03         ` Rob Herring
2015-11-20 16:03         ` Rob Herring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151122194556.GO32142@lukather \
    --to=maxime.ripard-wi1+55scjutkeb57/3fjtnbpr1lh4cv8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=julian.calaby-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mweseloh42-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.