From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, josh@joshtriplett.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] asm-generic: default BUG_ON(x) to "if(x) BUG()"
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 18:04:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151123170456.GE768@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4150271.zrLzq08T60@wuerfel>
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 05:52:38PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 23 November 2015 16:37:50 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 05:33:59PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > I think you could do better by simply calling panic("BUG!") instead as
> > > BUG() does. It will avoid the printk() call and pushing the file/line
> > > number onto the stack. It will also probably not inflate the rodata this
> > > way.
> >
> > Does that not depend on the architectures BUG() implementation? If an
> > architecture implements it as a signalling illegal instruction and a
> > lookup table, changing it to be a panic() would probably be more code.
>
> Correct, overall, we are down to a 1.40% size reduction compared to
> 1.70% without my patch and 1.49% with my version:
>
> section CONFIG_BUG=y CONFIG_BUG=n CONFIG_BUG=n+patch panic("BUG!")
>
> .text 8320248 | 8180944 | 8207688 | 8221848
> .rodata 3633720 | 3567144 | 3570648 | 3567344
> __bug_table 32508 | --- | --- | ---
> __modver 692 | 1584 | 2176 | 1384
> .init.text 558132 | 548300 | 550088 | 550592
> .exit.text 12380 | 12256 | 12380 | 12448
> .data 1016672 | 1016064 | 1016128 | 1016064
> Total 14622556 | 14374510 | 14407326 | 14417898
Thanks for testing :-)
Willy
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: w@1wt.eu (Willy Tarreau)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC] asm-generic: default BUG_ON(x) to "if(x) BUG()"
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 18:04:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151123170456.GE768@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4150271.zrLzq08T60@wuerfel>
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 05:52:38PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 23 November 2015 16:37:50 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 05:33:59PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > I think you could do better by simply calling panic("BUG!") instead as
> > > BUG() does. It will avoid the printk() call and pushing the file/line
> > > number onto the stack. It will also probably not inflate the rodata this
> > > way.
> >
> > Does that not depend on the architectures BUG() implementation? If an
> > architecture implements it as a signalling illegal instruction and a
> > lookup table, changing it to be a panic() would probably be more code.
>
> Correct, overall, we are down to a 1.40% size reduction compared to
> 1.70% without my patch and 1.49% with my version:
>
> section CONFIG_BUG=y CONFIG_BUG=n CONFIG_BUG=n+patch panic("BUG!")
>
> .text 8320248 | 8180944 | 8207688 | 8221848
> .rodata 3633720 | 3567144 | 3570648 | 3567344
> __bug_table 32508 | --- | --- | ---
> __modver 692 | 1584 | 2176 | 1384
> .init.text 558132 | 548300 | 550088 | 550592
> .exit.text 12380 | 12256 | 12380 | 12448
> .data 1016672 | 1016064 | 1016128 | 1016064
> Total 14622556 | 14374510 | 14407326 | 14417898
Thanks for testing :-)
Willy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-23 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-23 16:25 [RFC] asm-generic: default BUG_ON(x) to "if(x) BUG()" Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-23 16:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-23 16:33 ` Willy Tarreau
2015-11-23 16:33 ` Willy Tarreau
2015-11-23 16:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-23 16:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-23 16:52 ` Willy Tarreau
2015-11-23 16:52 ` Willy Tarreau
2015-11-23 16:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-23 16:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-23 17:04 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2015-11-23 17:04 ` Willy Tarreau
2015-11-23 17:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-23 17:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-23 19:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-23 19:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-23 16:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-23 16:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-23 20:16 ` Josh Triplett
2015-11-23 20:16 ` Josh Triplett
2015-11-23 20:16 ` Josh Triplett
2015-11-23 20:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-23 20:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-23 21:17 ` Josh Triplett
2015-11-23 21:17 ` Josh Triplett
2015-11-23 21:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-23 21:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151123170456.GE768@1wt.eu \
--to=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.