From: Lukas Wunner <lukas at wunner.de>
To: devel@acpica.org
Subject: Re: [Devel] [PATCH 2/5] eeepc-wmi: Use acpi_dev_present
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 20:55:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151123195527.GA26288@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20151123190413.GU7413@malice.jf.intel.com
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1340 bytes --]
Hi Darren,
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:04:13AM -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 03:34:55PM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > Use shiny new acpi_dev_present and remove all the boilerplate to search
> > for a particular ACPI device. No functional change.
>
> You did add a pr_warn, which is technically a functional change. Did you intend
> to leave that in?
That's not an addition of mine, I moved it from eeepc_wmi_parse_device()
to eeepc_wmi_probe() so that everything behaves exactly as before.
(See the deleted lines further up in the patch.)
> Rafael, I assume you will pick this up along with the acpi_dev_present ACPI
> change if you take that. Pleaes let me know if not.
The last patch in the series concerned Intel ASoC (sound/soc/intel/)
and the maintainer Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org> has replied that
"This will collide with some other work done on the Intel code in -next I
expect, probably best to merge this via ASoC (so pulling a shared branch
for the new API) or just wait till 4.5 to do the conversion."
[full quote of his message as it wasn't cc: platform-driver-x86]
So I guess Mark might pull it in, haven't heard back from the ACPI
maintainers yet.
> Otherwise,
> Acked-by: Darren Hart <dvhart(a)linux.intel.com>
Awesome, thanks!
Best regards,
Lukas
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devel@acpica.org,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] eeepc-wmi: Use acpi_dev_present
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 20:55:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151123195527.GA26288@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151123190413.GU7413@malice.jf.intel.com>
Hi Darren,
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:04:13AM -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 03:34:55PM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > Use shiny new acpi_dev_present and remove all the boilerplate to search
> > for a particular ACPI device. No functional change.
>
> You did add a pr_warn, which is technically a functional change. Did you intend
> to leave that in?
That's not an addition of mine, I moved it from eeepc_wmi_parse_device()
to eeepc_wmi_probe() so that everything behaves exactly as before.
(See the deleted lines further up in the patch.)
> Rafael, I assume you will pick this up along with the acpi_dev_present ACPI
> change if you take that. Pleaes let me know if not.
The last patch in the series concerned Intel ASoC (sound/soc/intel/)
and the maintainer Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> has replied that
"This will collide with some other work done on the Intel code in -next I
expect, probably best to merge this via ASoC (so pulling a shared branch
for the new API) or just wait till 4.5 to do the conversion."
[full quote of his message as it wasn't cc: platform-driver-x86]
So I guess Mark might pull it in, haven't heard back from the ACPI
maintainers yet.
> Otherwise,
> Acked-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Awesome, thanks!
Best regards,
Lukas
next prev reply other threads:[~2015-11-23 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-23 14:34 [PATCH 0/5] Add acpi_dev_present Lukas Wunner
2015-11-23 14:35 ` [Devel] " Lukas Wunner
2015-11-23 14:34 ` [PATCH 1/5] ACPICA: " Lukas Wunner
2015-11-23 14:35 ` [Devel] " Lukas Wunner
2015-11-23 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-11-23 22:22 ` Moore, Robert
2015-11-23 22:22 ` [Devel] " Moore, Robert
2015-11-23 23:32 ` Lukas Wunner
2015-11-23 23:32 ` [Devel] " Lukas Wunner
2015-11-24 4:40 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-11-24 14:15 ` Moore, Robert
2015-11-24 14:15 ` [Devel] " Moore, Robert
2015-11-24 14:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-11-24 14:54 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-11-24 14:54 ` [Devel] " Hanjun Guo
2015-11-23 14:34 ` [Devel] [PATCH 3/5] acer-wmi: Use acpi_dev_present Lukas Wunner
2015-11-23 14:34 ` Lukas Wunner
2015-11-23 19:06 ` Darren Hart
2015-11-23 14:34 ` [Devel] [PATCH 5/5] ASoC: Intel: " Lukas Wunner
2015-11-23 14:34 ` Lukas Wunner
2015-11-23 14:48 ` Mark Brown
2015-11-23 22:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-11-23 14:34 ` [Devel] [PATCH 2/5] eeepc-wmi: " Lukas Wunner
2015-11-23 14:34 ` Lukas Wunner
2015-11-23 19:04 ` Darren Hart
2015-11-23 19:55 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2015-11-23 19:55 ` Lukas Wunner
2015-11-23 21:00 ` Darren Hart
2015-11-23 22:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-11-24 17:08 ` Darren Hart
2015-11-23 14:34 ` [Devel] [PATCH 4/5] ALSA: hda - " Lukas Wunner
2015-11-23 14:34 ` Lukas Wunner
2015-11-24 1:51 ` [alsa-devel] " Hui Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151123195527.GA26288@wunner.de \
--to=devel@acpica.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.