All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arch: consolidate CONFIG_STRICT_DEVM in lib/Kconfig.debug
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 09:27:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151124082757.GB23624@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jLpm7iG17+ws2MfK7ZG9KEDaHWd5xxHSk7KHPyizYEm2A@mail.gmail.com>


* Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> * Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Let all the archs that implement CONFIG_STRICT_DEVM use a common
> >>> definition in lib/Kconfig.debug.
> >>
> >> For the x86 bit:
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> >>
> >>> Note, the 'depends on !SPARC' is due to sparc not implementing
> >>> devmem_is_allowed().
> >>
> >> Maybe that should be converted into a helper Kconfig switch for architectures to
> >> opt in to /dev/mem restrictions?
> >
> > Sure, easy enough to add a ARCH_HAS_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED opt-in.
> 
> Is there some hidden meaning about the difference between ARCH_HAS_...
> and HAVE_ARCH_... and HAVE_... ?

There's also the double underscore variants such as __HAVE_ARCH_STRNCASECMP! ;-)

It's all just nonsensical historic muck: because no-one ever was confronted with 
the messy global picture.

Today you can run Documentation/features/list-arch.sh and wonder at the zoo of 
options ;-)

Thanks,

	Ingo

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: mingo@kernel.org (Ingo Molnar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] arch: consolidate CONFIG_STRICT_DEVM in lib/Kconfig.debug
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 09:27:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151124082757.GB23624@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jLpm7iG17+ws2MfK7ZG9KEDaHWd5xxHSk7KHPyizYEm2A@mail.gmail.com>


* Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> * Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Let all the archs that implement CONFIG_STRICT_DEVM use a common
> >>> definition in lib/Kconfig.debug.
> >>
> >> For the x86 bit:
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> >>
> >>> Note, the 'depends on !SPARC' is due to sparc not implementing
> >>> devmem_is_allowed().
> >>
> >> Maybe that should be converted into a helper Kconfig switch for architectures to
> >> opt in to /dev/mem restrictions?
> >
> > Sure, easy enough to add a ARCH_HAS_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED opt-in.
> 
> Is there some hidden meaning about the difference between ARCH_HAS_...
> and HAVE_ARCH_... and HAVE_... ?

There's also the double underscore variants such as __HAVE_ARCH_STRNCASECMP! ;-)

It's all just nonsensical historic muck: because no-one ever was confronted with 
the messy global picture.

Today you can run Documentation/features/list-arch.sh and wonder at the zoo of 
options ;-)

Thanks,

	Ingo

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arch: consolidate CONFIG_STRICT_DEVM in lib/Kconfig.debug
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 09:27:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151124082757.GB23624@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jLpm7iG17+ws2MfK7ZG9KEDaHWd5xxHSk7KHPyizYEm2A@mail.gmail.com>


* Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> * Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Let all the archs that implement CONFIG_STRICT_DEVM use a common
> >>> definition in lib/Kconfig.debug.
> >>
> >> For the x86 bit:
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> >>
> >>> Note, the 'depends on !SPARC' is due to sparc not implementing
> >>> devmem_is_allowed().
> >>
> >> Maybe that should be converted into a helper Kconfig switch for architectures to
> >> opt in to /dev/mem restrictions?
> >
> > Sure, easy enough to add a ARCH_HAS_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED opt-in.
> 
> Is there some hidden meaning about the difference between ARCH_HAS_...
> and HAVE_ARCH_... and HAVE_... ?

There's also the double underscore variants such as __HAVE_ARCH_STRNCASECMP! ;-)

It's all just nonsensical historic muck: because no-one ever was confronted with 
the messy global picture.

Today you can run Documentation/features/list-arch.sh and wonder at the zoo of 
options ;-)

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-24  8:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-22  3:57 [PATCH 1/2] arch: consolidate CONFIG_STRICT_DEVM in lib/Kconfig.debug Dan Williams
2015-11-22  3:57 ` Dan Williams
2015-11-22  3:57 ` Dan Williams
2015-11-22  3:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] restrict /dev/mem to idle io memory ranges Dan Williams
2015-11-22  3:57   ` Dan Williams
2015-11-22  3:57   ` Dan Williams
2015-11-23 19:00   ` Kees Cook
2015-11-23 19:00     ` Kees Cook
2015-11-23 19:00     ` Kees Cook
2015-11-23  8:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] arch: consolidate CONFIG_STRICT_DEVM in lib/Kconfig.debug Ingo Molnar
2015-11-23  8:12   ` Ingo Molnar
2015-11-23  8:12   ` Ingo Molnar
2015-11-23 17:12   ` Dan Williams
2015-11-23 17:12     ` Dan Williams
2015-11-23 17:12     ` Dan Williams
2015-11-23 18:56     ` Kees Cook
2015-11-23 18:56       ` Kees Cook
2015-11-23 18:56       ` Kees Cook
2015-11-24  8:27       ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-11-24  8:27         ` Ingo Molnar
2015-11-24  8:27         ` Ingo Molnar
2015-11-23  9:53 ` Heiko Carstens
2015-11-23  9:53   ` Heiko Carstens
2015-11-23  9:53   ` Heiko Carstens
2015-11-23 17:09   ` Dan Williams
2015-11-23 17:09     ` Dan Williams
2015-11-23 17:09     ` Dan Williams
2015-11-23 10:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-23 10:19   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-23 10:19   ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151124082757.GB23624@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.