All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Resend: PATCH v2 0/3] Fix rcar-pcie for arm64
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 10:40:33 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151125164033.GA1380@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448465439-2132-1-git-send-email-phil.edworthy@renesas.com>

Hi Phil,

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 03:30:36PM +0000, Phil Edworthy wrote:
> The first patches fixes the build problem

I'm trying to figure out if v4.4 has a build problem we need to fix.
If I understand correctly, "PCI: rcar: Convert to DT resource parsing
API" doesn't fix a build problem in the current tree; rather, it
removes a dependency on ARM so that we can build it on ARM64.  

> , and the second patch reverts the
> patch that removed the driver from arm64 builds. The final patch add a compat
> string for the r8a7795 (arm64) device.
> 
> Tested on arm Koelsch board, all ok.
> 
> Tested on arm64 Salvator-X board using renesas-drivers-2015-10-27-v4.3-rc7 from
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/geert/renesas-drivers.git with PCI
> next merged. 
> Apart from patches to add the PCIe clock and DT nodes, it also needs this fix:
> ("PCI: MSI: Only use the generic MSI layer when domain is hierarchical")

I assume you mean this one from Marc: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/23/388
(Was that posted to linux-pci?  I don't see it in patchwork or my
linux-pci archives, so I hadn't seen it yet.)

How exactly is that related to this series?  If I merge these before
Marc's change, do we have a tree that builds for arm64 but doesn't
work?

What about the PCIe clock and DT changes you mention?  Is there a
reason to keep them separate?  Would it be feasible to include the DT
changes in the same patch as the driver change that uses those
changes?

Bjorn

> Resent with whole series marked as v2 and acks, etc added.
> 
> Harunobu Kurokawa (1):
>   PCI: pcie-rcar: Add support for R-Car H3.
> 
> Phil Edworthy (2):
>   PCI: rcar: Convert to DT resource parsing API
>   Revert "PCI: rcar: Build pcie-rcar.c only on ARM"
> 
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/rcar-pci.txt |   3 +-
>  drivers/pci/host/Kconfig                           |   3 +-
>  drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c                       | 117 +++++++++++++--------
>  3 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.5.0
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Resend: PATCH v2 0/3] Fix rcar-pcie for arm64
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 16:40:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151125164033.GA1380@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448465439-2132-1-git-send-email-phil.edworthy@renesas.com>

Hi Phil,

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 03:30:36PM +0000, Phil Edworthy wrote:
> The first patches fixes the build problem

I'm trying to figure out if v4.4 has a build problem we need to fix.
If I understand correctly, "PCI: rcar: Convert to DT resource parsing
API" doesn't fix a build problem in the current tree; rather, it
removes a dependency on ARM so that we can build it on ARM64.  

> , and the second patch reverts the
> patch that removed the driver from arm64 builds. The final patch add a compat
> string for the r8a7795 (arm64) device.
> 
> Tested on arm Koelsch board, all ok.
> 
> Tested on arm64 Salvator-X board using renesas-drivers-2015-10-27-v4.3-rc7 from
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/geert/renesas-drivers.git with PCI
> next merged. 
> Apart from patches to add the PCIe clock and DT nodes, it also needs this fix:
> ("PCI: MSI: Only use the generic MSI layer when domain is hierarchical")

I assume you mean this one from Marc: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/23/388
(Was that posted to linux-pci?  I don't see it in patchwork or my
linux-pci archives, so I hadn't seen it yet.)

How exactly is that related to this series?  If I merge these before
Marc's change, do we have a tree that builds for arm64 but doesn't
work?

What about the PCIe clock and DT changes you mention?  Is there a
reason to keep them separate?  Would it be feasible to include the DT
changes in the same patch as the driver change that uses those
changes?

Bjorn

> Resent with whole series marked as v2 and acks, etc added.
> 
> Harunobu Kurokawa (1):
>   PCI: pcie-rcar: Add support for R-Car H3.
> 
> Phil Edworthy (2):
>   PCI: rcar: Convert to DT resource parsing API
>   Revert "PCI: rcar: Build pcie-rcar.c only on ARM"
> 
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/rcar-pci.txt |   3 +-
>  drivers/pci/host/Kconfig                           |   3 +-
>  drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c                       | 117 +++++++++++++--------
>  3 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.5.0
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-11-25 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-25 15:30 [Resend: PATCH v2 0/3] Fix rcar-pcie for arm64 Phil Edworthy
2015-11-25 15:30 ` Phil Edworthy
2015-11-25 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] PCI: rcar: Convert to DT resource parsing API Phil Edworthy
2015-11-25 15:30   ` Phil Edworthy
2015-11-25 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] Revert "PCI: rcar: Build pcie-rcar.c only on ARM" Phil Edworthy
2015-11-25 15:30   ` Phil Edworthy
2015-11-25 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] PCI: pcie-rcar: Add support for R-Car H3 Phil Edworthy
2015-11-25 15:30   ` Phil Edworthy
2015-11-25 16:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2015-11-25 16:40   ` [Resend: PATCH v2 0/3] Fix rcar-pcie for arm64 Bjorn Helgaas
2015-11-26  8:32   ` Phil Edworthy
2015-12-09 16:59     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-12-09 16:59       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-12-10  4:27       ` Simon Horman
2015-12-10  4:27         ` Simon Horman
2015-12-10 18:12       ` Phil Edworthy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151125164033.GA1380@localhost \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=phil.edworthy@renesas.com \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.