From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
christoffer.dall@linaro.org, will.deacon@arm.com,
alex.bennee@linaro.org, wei@redhat.com, cov@codeaurora.org,
shannon.zhao@linaro.org, peter.huangpeng@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMCR_EL0 register
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 18:11:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151130181136.253445ec@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1446186123-11548-5-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:21:46 +0800
Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
>
> Add reset handler which gets host value of PMCR_EL0 and make writable
> bits architecturally UNKNOWN except PMCR.E to zero. Add a common access
> handler for PMU registers which emulates writing and reading register
> and add emulation for PMCR.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 106 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index d03d3af..5b591d6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
> #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_host.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_mmu.h>
> +#include <asm/pmu.h>
>
> #include <trace/events/kvm.h>
>
> @@ -446,6 +447,67 @@ static void reset_mpidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, MPIDR_EL1) = (1ULL << 31) | mpidr;
> }
>
> +static void vcpu_sysreg_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r, u64 val)
> +{
> + if (!vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu))
> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = val;
> + else
> + vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg) = lower_32_bits(val);
> +}
> +
> +static void reset_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + u64 pmcr, val;
> +
> + asm volatile("mrs %0, pmcr_el0\n" : "=r" (pmcr));
> + /* Writable bits of PMCR_EL0 (ARMV8_PMCR_MASK) is reset to UNKNOWN
> + * except PMCR.E resetting to zero.
> + */
> + val = ((pmcr & ~ARMV8_PMCR_MASK) | (ARMV8_PMCR_MASK & 0xdecafbad))
> + & (~ARMV8_PMCR_E);
> + vcpu_sysreg_write(vcpu, r, val);
> +}
> +
> +/* PMU registers accessor. */
> +static bool access_pmu_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + const struct sys_reg_params *p,
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + unsigned long val;
I'd feel a lot more comfortable if this was a u64...
> +
> + if (p->is_write) {
> + switch (r->reg) {
> + case PMCR_EL0: {
> + /* Only update writeable bits of PMCR */
> + val = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
> + val &= ~ARMV8_PMCR_MASK;
> + val |= *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) & ARMV8_PMCR_MASK;
> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = val;
> + break;
> + }
> + default:
> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt);
> + break;
> + }
> + } else {
> + switch (r->reg) {
> + case PMCR_EL0: {
> + /* PMCR.P & PMCR.C are RAZ */
> + val = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg)
> + & ~(ARMV8_PMCR_P | ARMV8_PMCR_C);
> + *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = val;
> + break;
> + }
> + default:
> + *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> /* Silly macro to expand the DBG{BCR,BVR,WVR,WCR}n_EL1 registers in one go */
> #define DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR_EL1(n) \
> /* DBGBVRn_EL1 */ \
> @@ -630,7 +692,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
>
> /* PMCR_EL0 */
> { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1100), Op2(0b000),
> - trap_raz_wi },
> + access_pmu_regs, reset_pmcr, PMCR_EL0, },
> /* PMCNTENSET_EL0 */
> { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1100), Op2(0b001),
> trap_raz_wi },
> @@ -864,6 +926,45 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc cp14_64_regs[] = {
> { Op1( 0), CRm( 2), .access = trap_raz_wi },
> };
>
> +/* PMU CP15 registers accessor. */
> +static bool access_pmu_cp15_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + const struct sys_reg_params *p,
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + unsigned long val;
... and this a u32.
> +
> + if (p->is_write) {
> + switch (r->reg) {
> + case c9_PMCR: {
> + /* Only update writeable bits of PMCR */
> + val = vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg);
> + val &= ~ARMV8_PMCR_MASK;
> + val |= *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) & ARMV8_PMCR_MASK;
> + vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg) = val;
> + break;
> + }
> + default:
> + vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg) = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt);
> + break;
> + }
> + } else {
> + switch (r->reg) {
> + case c9_PMCR: {
> + /* PMCR.P & PMCR.C are RAZ */
> + val = vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg)
> + & ~(ARMV8_PMCR_P | ARMV8_PMCR_C);
> + *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = val;
> + break;
> + }
> + default:
> + *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Trapped cp15 registers. TTBR0/TTBR1 get a double encoding,
> * depending on the way they are accessed (as a 32bit or a 64bit
> @@ -892,7 +993,8 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc cp15_regs[] = {
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 7), CRm(14), Op2( 2), access_dcsw },
>
> /* PMU */
> - { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 0), trap_raz_wi },
> + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 0), access_pmu_cp15_regs,
> + reset_pmcr, c9_PMCR },
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 1), trap_raz_wi },
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 2), trap_raz_wi },
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 3), trap_raz_wi },
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 04/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMCR_EL0 register
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 18:11:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151130181136.253445ec@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1446186123-11548-5-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:21:46 +0800
Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
>
> Add reset handler which gets host value of PMCR_EL0 and make writable
> bits architecturally UNKNOWN except PMCR.E to zero. Add a common access
> handler for PMU registers which emulates writing and reading register
> and add emulation for PMCR.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 106 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index d03d3af..5b591d6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
> #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_host.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_mmu.h>
> +#include <asm/pmu.h>
>
> #include <trace/events/kvm.h>
>
> @@ -446,6 +447,67 @@ static void reset_mpidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, MPIDR_EL1) = (1ULL << 31) | mpidr;
> }
>
> +static void vcpu_sysreg_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r, u64 val)
> +{
> + if (!vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu))
> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = val;
> + else
> + vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg) = lower_32_bits(val);
> +}
> +
> +static void reset_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + u64 pmcr, val;
> +
> + asm volatile("mrs %0, pmcr_el0\n" : "=r" (pmcr));
> + /* Writable bits of PMCR_EL0 (ARMV8_PMCR_MASK) is reset to UNKNOWN
> + * except PMCR.E resetting to zero.
> + */
> + val = ((pmcr & ~ARMV8_PMCR_MASK) | (ARMV8_PMCR_MASK & 0xdecafbad))
> + & (~ARMV8_PMCR_E);
> + vcpu_sysreg_write(vcpu, r, val);
> +}
> +
> +/* PMU registers accessor. */
> +static bool access_pmu_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + const struct sys_reg_params *p,
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + unsigned long val;
I'd feel a lot more comfortable if this was a u64...
> +
> + if (p->is_write) {
> + switch (r->reg) {
> + case PMCR_EL0: {
> + /* Only update writeable bits of PMCR */
> + val = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
> + val &= ~ARMV8_PMCR_MASK;
> + val |= *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) & ARMV8_PMCR_MASK;
> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = val;
> + break;
> + }
> + default:
> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt);
> + break;
> + }
> + } else {
> + switch (r->reg) {
> + case PMCR_EL0: {
> + /* PMCR.P & PMCR.C are RAZ */
> + val = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg)
> + & ~(ARMV8_PMCR_P | ARMV8_PMCR_C);
> + *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = val;
> + break;
> + }
> + default:
> + *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> /* Silly macro to expand the DBG{BCR,BVR,WVR,WCR}n_EL1 registers in one go */
> #define DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR_EL1(n) \
> /* DBGBVRn_EL1 */ \
> @@ -630,7 +692,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
>
> /* PMCR_EL0 */
> { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1100), Op2(0b000),
> - trap_raz_wi },
> + access_pmu_regs, reset_pmcr, PMCR_EL0, },
> /* PMCNTENSET_EL0 */
> { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1100), Op2(0b001),
> trap_raz_wi },
> @@ -864,6 +926,45 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc cp14_64_regs[] = {
> { Op1( 0), CRm( 2), .access = trap_raz_wi },
> };
>
> +/* PMU CP15 registers accessor. */
> +static bool access_pmu_cp15_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + const struct sys_reg_params *p,
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + unsigned long val;
... and this a u32.
> +
> + if (p->is_write) {
> + switch (r->reg) {
> + case c9_PMCR: {
> + /* Only update writeable bits of PMCR */
> + val = vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg);
> + val &= ~ARMV8_PMCR_MASK;
> + val |= *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) & ARMV8_PMCR_MASK;
> + vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg) = val;
> + break;
> + }
> + default:
> + vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg) = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt);
> + break;
> + }
> + } else {
> + switch (r->reg) {
> + case c9_PMCR: {
> + /* PMCR.P & PMCR.C are RAZ */
> + val = vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg)
> + & ~(ARMV8_PMCR_P | ARMV8_PMCR_C);
> + *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = val;
> + break;
> + }
> + default:
> + *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Trapped cp15 registers. TTBR0/TTBR1 get a double encoding,
> * depending on the way they are accessed (as a 32bit or a 64bit
> @@ -892,7 +993,8 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc cp15_regs[] = {
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 7), CRm(14), Op2( 2), access_dcsw },
>
> /* PMU */
> - { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 0), trap_raz_wi },
> + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 0), access_pmu_cp15_regs,
> + reset_pmcr, c9_PMCR },
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 1), trap_raz_wi },
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 2), trap_raz_wi },
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 3), trap_raz_wi },
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>
Cc: <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
<christoffer.dall@linaro.org>, <will.deacon@arm.com>,
<alex.bennee@linaro.org>, <wei@redhat.com>, <cov@codeaurora.org>,
<shannon.zhao@linaro.org>, <peter.huangpeng@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMCR_EL0 register
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 18:11:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151130181136.253445ec@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1446186123-11548-5-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:21:46 +0800
Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
>
> Add reset handler which gets host value of PMCR_EL0 and make writable
> bits architecturally UNKNOWN except PMCR.E to zero. Add a common access
> handler for PMU registers which emulates writing and reading register
> and add emulation for PMCR.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 106 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index d03d3af..5b591d6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
> #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_host.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_mmu.h>
> +#include <asm/pmu.h>
>
> #include <trace/events/kvm.h>
>
> @@ -446,6 +447,67 @@ static void reset_mpidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, MPIDR_EL1) = (1ULL << 31) | mpidr;
> }
>
> +static void vcpu_sysreg_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r, u64 val)
> +{
> + if (!vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu))
> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = val;
> + else
> + vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg) = lower_32_bits(val);
> +}
> +
> +static void reset_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + u64 pmcr, val;
> +
> + asm volatile("mrs %0, pmcr_el0\n" : "=r" (pmcr));
> + /* Writable bits of PMCR_EL0 (ARMV8_PMCR_MASK) is reset to UNKNOWN
> + * except PMCR.E resetting to zero.
> + */
> + val = ((pmcr & ~ARMV8_PMCR_MASK) | (ARMV8_PMCR_MASK & 0xdecafbad))
> + & (~ARMV8_PMCR_E);
> + vcpu_sysreg_write(vcpu, r, val);
> +}
> +
> +/* PMU registers accessor. */
> +static bool access_pmu_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + const struct sys_reg_params *p,
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + unsigned long val;
I'd feel a lot more comfortable if this was a u64...
> +
> + if (p->is_write) {
> + switch (r->reg) {
> + case PMCR_EL0: {
> + /* Only update writeable bits of PMCR */
> + val = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
> + val &= ~ARMV8_PMCR_MASK;
> + val |= *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) & ARMV8_PMCR_MASK;
> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = val;
> + break;
> + }
> + default:
> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt);
> + break;
> + }
> + } else {
> + switch (r->reg) {
> + case PMCR_EL0: {
> + /* PMCR.P & PMCR.C are RAZ */
> + val = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg)
> + & ~(ARMV8_PMCR_P | ARMV8_PMCR_C);
> + *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = val;
> + break;
> + }
> + default:
> + *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> /* Silly macro to expand the DBG{BCR,BVR,WVR,WCR}n_EL1 registers in one go */
> #define DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR_EL1(n) \
> /* DBGBVRn_EL1 */ \
> @@ -630,7 +692,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
>
> /* PMCR_EL0 */
> { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1100), Op2(0b000),
> - trap_raz_wi },
> + access_pmu_regs, reset_pmcr, PMCR_EL0, },
> /* PMCNTENSET_EL0 */
> { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1100), Op2(0b001),
> trap_raz_wi },
> @@ -864,6 +926,45 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc cp14_64_regs[] = {
> { Op1( 0), CRm( 2), .access = trap_raz_wi },
> };
>
> +/* PMU CP15 registers accessor. */
> +static bool access_pmu_cp15_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + const struct sys_reg_params *p,
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + unsigned long val;
... and this a u32.
> +
> + if (p->is_write) {
> + switch (r->reg) {
> + case c9_PMCR: {
> + /* Only update writeable bits of PMCR */
> + val = vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg);
> + val &= ~ARMV8_PMCR_MASK;
> + val |= *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) & ARMV8_PMCR_MASK;
> + vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg) = val;
> + break;
> + }
> + default:
> + vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg) = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt);
> + break;
> + }
> + } else {
> + switch (r->reg) {
> + case c9_PMCR: {
> + /* PMCR.P & PMCR.C are RAZ */
> + val = vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg)
> + & ~(ARMV8_PMCR_P | ARMV8_PMCR_C);
> + *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = val;
> + break;
> + }
> + default:
> + *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Trapped cp15 registers. TTBR0/TTBR1 get a double encoding,
> * depending on the way they are accessed (as a 32bit or a 64bit
> @@ -892,7 +993,8 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc cp15_regs[] = {
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 7), CRm(14), Op2( 2), access_dcsw },
>
> /* PMU */
> - { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 0), trap_raz_wi },
> + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 0), access_pmu_cp15_regs,
> + reset_pmcr, c9_PMCR },
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 1), trap_raz_wi },
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 2), trap_raz_wi },
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 3), trap_raz_wi },
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-30 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 142+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-30 6:21 [PATCH v4 00/21] KVM: ARM64: Add guest PMU support Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` [PATCH v4 01/21] ARM64: Move PMU register related defines to asm/pmu.h Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` [PATCH v4 02/21] KVM: ARM64: Define PMU data structure for each vcpu Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` [PATCH v4 03/21] KVM: ARM64: Add offset defines for PMU registers Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` [PATCH v4 04/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMCR_EL0 register Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-11-30 18:11 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2015-11-30 18:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-30 18:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-10-30 6:21 ` [PATCH v4 05/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMSELR register Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-11-02 20:06 ` Christopher Covington
2015-11-02 20:06 ` Christopher Covington
2015-11-30 17:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-30 17:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-01 1:51 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-01 1:51 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-01 8:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-01 8:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-01 12:46 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-01 12:46 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` [PATCH v4 06/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMCEID0 and PMCEID1 register Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-11-30 11:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-30 11:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-30 11:59 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-11-30 11:59 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-11-30 13:19 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-30 13:19 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-30 13:19 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-10-30 6:21 ` [PATCH v4 07/21] KVM: ARM64: PMU: Add perf event map and introduce perf event creating function Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-11-02 20:13 ` Christopher Covington
2015-11-02 20:13 ` Christopher Covington
2015-11-03 2:33 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-11-03 2:33 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-11-03 2:33 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` [PATCH v4 08/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMXEVTYPER register Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-11-02 20:54 ` Christopher Covington
2015-11-02 20:54 ` Christopher Covington
2015-11-03 2:41 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-11-03 2:41 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-11-03 2:41 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-11-30 18:12 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-30 18:12 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-30 18:12 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-01 2:42 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-01 2:42 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` [PATCH v4 09/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMXEVCNTR register Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` [PATCH v4 10/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMCCNTR register Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` [PATCH v4 11/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMCNTENSET and PMCNTENCLR register Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` [PATCH v4 12/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMINTENSET and PMINTENCLR register Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` [PATCH v4 13/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMOVSSET and PMOVSCLR register Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` [PATCH v4 14/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMUSERENR register Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` [PATCH v4 15/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMSWINC register Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` [PATCH v4 16/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handlers for PMEVCNTRn and PMEVTYPERn register Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` [PATCH v4 17/21] KVM: ARM64: Add helper to handle PMCR register bits Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:21 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-11-02 21:20 ` Christopher Covington
2015-11-02 21:20 ` Christopher Covington
2015-10-30 6:22 ` [PATCH v4 18/21] KVM: ARM64: Add PMU overflow interrupt routing Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:22 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:22 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 12:08 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-30 12:08 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-30 12:08 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-31 2:06 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-31 2:06 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-11-30 18:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-30 18:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-30 18:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-01 14:35 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-01 14:35 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-01 14:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-01 14:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-01 15:13 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-01 15:13 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-01 15:41 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-01 15:41 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-01 16:26 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-01 16:26 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-01 16:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-01 16:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-02 2:40 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-02 2:40 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-02 8:45 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-02 8:45 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-02 9:49 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-02 9:49 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-02 10:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-02 10:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-02 16:27 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-12-02 16:27 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-10-30 6:22 ` [PATCH v4 19/21] KVM: ARM64: Reset PMU state when resetting vcpu Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:22 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:22 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:22 ` [PATCH v4 20/21] KVM: ARM64: Free perf event of PMU when destroying vcpu Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:22 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:22 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:22 ` [PATCH v4 21/21] KVM: ARM64: Add a new kvm ARM PMU device Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:22 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-10-30 6:22 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-11-30 18:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-30 18:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-30 18:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-30 18:34 ` [PATCH v4 00/21] KVM: ARM64: Add guest PMU support Marc Zyngier
2015-11-30 18:34 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-30 18:34 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-01 1:52 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-01 1:52 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-01 1:52 ` Shannon Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151130181136.253445ec@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=cov@codeaurora.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=peter.huangpeng@huawei.com \
--cc=shannon.zhao@linaro.org \
--cc=wei@redhat.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=zhaoshenglong@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.