From: Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org,
linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org,
akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org,
kuleshovmail-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
ryan.harkin-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
roy.franz-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
msalter-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] UEFI boot and runtime services support for 32-bit ARM
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 10:18:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151203101823.GA11337@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448886507-3216-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Hi Ard,
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 01:28:14PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> This series adds support for booting the 32-bit ARM kernel directly from
> UEFI firmware using a builtin UEFI stub. It mostly reuses refactored arm64
> code, and the differences (primarily the PE/COFF header and entry point and
> the efi_create_mapping() implementation) are split out into arm64 and ARM
> versions.
>
> Since I did not receive any further comments in reply to v3 from the people who
> commented on v2, I think this series in now in sufficient shape to be pulled.
> Note that patch #1 touches mm/memblock.c and include/linux/memblock.h, for which
> get_maintainer.pl does not provide a maintainer, so it has been cc'ed to various
> past editors of those files, and to the linux-mm mailing list.
>
> Since the series affects both arm64 and ARM, it is up to the maintainers to let
> me know how and when they wish to proceed with this. My suggestion would be to
> send out pull request for patches #1 - #5 to the arm64 maintainer, and for the
> whole series to the ARM maintainer. This should keep any conflicts on either
> side confined to the respective maintainer tree, rather then propagating all the
> way to -next.
For the arm64 bits (patches 2-5):
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
I'd really like an ack from the mm crowd on patch 1 before I queue it.
Will
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 00/13] UEFI boot and runtime services support for 32-bit ARM
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 10:18:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151203101823.GA11337@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448886507-3216-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Hi Ard,
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 01:28:14PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> This series adds support for booting the 32-bit ARM kernel directly from
> UEFI firmware using a builtin UEFI stub. It mostly reuses refactored arm64
> code, and the differences (primarily the PE/COFF header and entry point and
> the efi_create_mapping() implementation) are split out into arm64 and ARM
> versions.
>
> Since I did not receive any further comments in reply to v3 from the people who
> commented on v2, I think this series in now in sufficient shape to be pulled.
> Note that patch #1 touches mm/memblock.c and include/linux/memblock.h, for which
> get_maintainer.pl does not provide a maintainer, so it has been cc'ed to various
> past editors of those files, and to the linux-mm mailing list.
>
> Since the series affects both arm64 and ARM, it is up to the maintainers to let
> me know how and when they wish to proceed with this. My suggestion would be to
> send out pull request for patches #1 - #5 to the arm64 maintainer, and for the
> whole series to the ARM maintainer. This should keep any conflicts on either
> side confined to the respective maintainer tree, rather then propagating all the
> way to -next.
For the arm64 bits (patches 2-5):
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
I'd really like an ack from the mm crowd on patch 1 before I queue it.
Will
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
leif.lindholm@linaro.org, matt@codeblueprint.co.uk,
linux@arm.linux.org.uk, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
kuleshovmail@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
ryan.harkin@linaro.org, grant.likely@linaro.org,
roy.franz@linaro.org, msalter@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] UEFI boot and runtime services support for 32-bit ARM
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 10:18:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151203101823.GA11337@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448886507-3216-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Hi Ard,
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 01:28:14PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> This series adds support for booting the 32-bit ARM kernel directly from
> UEFI firmware using a builtin UEFI stub. It mostly reuses refactored arm64
> code, and the differences (primarily the PE/COFF header and entry point and
> the efi_create_mapping() implementation) are split out into arm64 and ARM
> versions.
>
> Since I did not receive any further comments in reply to v3 from the people who
> commented on v2, I think this series in now in sufficient shape to be pulled.
> Note that patch #1 touches mm/memblock.c and include/linux/memblock.h, for which
> get_maintainer.pl does not provide a maintainer, so it has been cc'ed to various
> past editors of those files, and to the linux-mm mailing list.
>
> Since the series affects both arm64 and ARM, it is up to the maintainers to let
> me know how and when they wish to proceed with this. My suggestion would be to
> send out pull request for patches #1 - #5 to the arm64 maintainer, and for the
> whole series to the ARM maintainer. This should keep any conflicts on either
> side confined to the respective maintainer tree, rather then propagating all the
> way to -next.
For the arm64 bits (patches 2-5):
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
I'd really like an ack from the mm crowd on patch 1 before I queue it.
Will
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-03 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-30 12:28 [PATCH v4 00/13] UEFI boot and runtime services support for 32-bit ARM Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-30 12:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-30 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] mm/memblock: add MEMBLOCK_NOMAP attribute to memblock memory table Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-30 12:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-12-03 10:55 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-12-03 10:55 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-12-03 11:27 ` Alexander Kuleshov
2015-12-03 11:27 ` Alexander Kuleshov
2015-12-08 12:07 ` Will Deacon
2015-12-08 12:07 ` Will Deacon
[not found] ` <20151208120743.GG19612-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2015-12-08 22:23 ` Andrew Morton
2015-12-08 22:23 ` Andrew Morton
2015-12-08 22:23 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20151208142341.b91ab5728f244a68231e3b87-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2015-12-09 11:29 ` Will Deacon
2015-12-09 11:29 ` Will Deacon
2015-12-09 11:29 ` Will Deacon
2015-11-30 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 02/13] arm64: only consider memblocks with NOMAP cleared for linear mapping Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-30 12:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-30 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 03/13] arm64/efi: mark UEFI reserved regions as MEMBLOCK_NOMAP Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-30 12:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-30 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] arm64/efi: refactor EFI init and runtime code for reuse by 32-bit ARM Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-30 12:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-30 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 08/13] ARM: factor out allocation routine from __create_mapping() Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-30 12:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-30 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 10/13] ARM: implement create_mapping_late() for EFI use Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-30 12:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
[not found] ` <1448886507-3216-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2015-11-30 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] arm64/efi: split off EFI init and runtime code for reuse by 32-bit ARM Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-30 12:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-30 12:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-30 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 06/13] ARM: add support for generic early_ioremap/early_memremap Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-30 12:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-30 12:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-30 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 07/13] ARM: split off core mapping logic from create_mapping Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-30 12:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-30 12:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-30 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] ARM: add support for non-global kernel mappings Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-30 12:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-30 12:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-30 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] ARM: only consider memblocks with NOMAP cleared for linear mapping Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-30 12:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-30 12:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-30 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] ARM: wire up UEFI init and runtime support Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-30 12:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-30 12:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-30 12:28 ` [PATCH v4 13/13] ARM: add UEFI stub support Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-30 12:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-30 12:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-12-02 14:53 ` [PATCH v4 00/13] UEFI boot and runtime services support for 32-bit ARM Ard Biesheuvel
2015-12-02 14:53 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-12-02 14:53 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-12-03 10:18 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2015-12-03 10:18 ` Will Deacon
2015-12-03 10:18 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151203101823.GA11337@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon-5wv7dgnigg8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kuleshovmail-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org \
--cc=msalter-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=roy.franz-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ryan.harkin-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.