From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RESEND v4 2/6] remoteproc: debugfs: Add ability to boot remote processor using debugfs
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 12:26:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151203122634.GX12874@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJAp7Og2MPapOQmCSB9o4qwQHsA8_iyAWPhjHYPw6J=xCK2xew@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 5:14 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> > This functionality is especially useful during the testing phase. When
> > used in conjunction with Mailbox's Test Framework we can trivially conduct
> > end-to-end testing i.e. boot co-processor, send and receive messages to
> > the co-processor, then shut it down again (repeat as required).
> >
>
> I want this too!
>
> > Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
> > index 9d30809..8113c18 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
> > @@ -88,8 +88,42 @@ static ssize_t rproc_state_read(struct file *filp, char __user *userbuf,
> > return simple_read_from_buffer(userbuf, count, ppos, buf, i);
> > }
> >
> > +static ssize_t rproc_state_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *userbuf,
> > + size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> > +{
> > + struct rproc *rproc = filp->private_data;
> > + char buf[10];
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (count > sizeof(buf))
> > + return count;
> > +
> > + ret = copy_from_user(buf, userbuf, count);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return -EFAULT;
> > +
> > + if (buf[count - 1] == '\n')
> > + buf[count - 1] = '\0';
>
> I believe you can get here with count = 0.
I'm pretty sure you can't.
If you are sure that you can, if you can provide me with a way of
testing, I'd be happy to put in provisions.
> > +
> > + if (!strncmp(buf, "start", count)) {
> > + ret = rproc_boot(rproc);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "Boot failed: %d\n", ret);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > + } else if (!strncmp(buf, "stop", count)) {
> > + rproc_shutdown(rproc);
> > + } else {
> > + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "Unrecognised option: %s\n", buf);
>
> Unrecognized
What I have is correct.
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return count;
> > +}
> > +
> > static const struct file_operations rproc_state_ops = {
> > .read = rproc_state_read,
> > + .write = rproc_state_write,
> > .open = simple_open,
> > .llseek = generic_file_llseek,
> > };
>
> Part of these nits
>
> Acked-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com>
Thanks.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn-UYDU3/A3LUY@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
kernel-F5mvAk5X5gdBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad-Ix1uc/W3ht7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
"devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Nathan_Lynch-nmGgyN9QBj3QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
Florian Fainelli
<f.fainelli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
ludovic.barre-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org,
Suman Anna <s-anna-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND v4 2/6] remoteproc: debugfs: Add ability to boot remote processor using debugfs
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 12:26:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151203122634.GX12874@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJAp7Og2MPapOQmCSB9o4qwQHsA8_iyAWPhjHYPw6J=xCK2xew-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 5:14 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > This functionality is especially useful during the testing phase. When
> > used in conjunction with Mailbox's Test Framework we can trivially conduct
> > end-to-end testing i.e. boot co-processor, send and receive messages to
> > the co-processor, then shut it down again (repeat as required).
> >
>
> I want this too!
>
> > Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
> > index 9d30809..8113c18 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
> > @@ -88,8 +88,42 @@ static ssize_t rproc_state_read(struct file *filp, char __user *userbuf,
> > return simple_read_from_buffer(userbuf, count, ppos, buf, i);
> > }
> >
> > +static ssize_t rproc_state_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *userbuf,
> > + size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> > +{
> > + struct rproc *rproc = filp->private_data;
> > + char buf[10];
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (count > sizeof(buf))
> > + return count;
> > +
> > + ret = copy_from_user(buf, userbuf, count);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return -EFAULT;
> > +
> > + if (buf[count - 1] == '\n')
> > + buf[count - 1] = '\0';
>
> I believe you can get here with count = 0.
I'm pretty sure you can't.
If you are sure that you can, if you can provide me with a way of
testing, I'd be happy to put in provisions.
> > +
> > + if (!strncmp(buf, "start", count)) {
> > + ret = rproc_boot(rproc);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "Boot failed: %d\n", ret);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > + } else if (!strncmp(buf, "stop", count)) {
> > + rproc_shutdown(rproc);
> > + } else {
> > + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "Unrecognised option: %s\n", buf);
>
> Unrecognized
What I have is correct.
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return count;
> > +}
> > +
> > static const struct file_operations rproc_state_ops = {
> > .read = rproc_state_read,
> > + .write = rproc_state_write,
> > .open = simple_open,
> > .llseek = generic_file_llseek,
> > };
>
> Part of these nits
>
> Acked-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson-/MT0OVThwyLZJqsBc5GL+g@public.gmane.org>
Thanks.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@kryo.se>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel@stlinux.com, Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Nathan_Lynch@mentor.com, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
ludovic.barre@st.com, Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND v4 2/6] remoteproc: debugfs: Add ability to boot remote processor using debugfs
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 12:26:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151203122634.GX12874@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJAp7Og2MPapOQmCSB9o4qwQHsA8_iyAWPhjHYPw6J=xCK2xew@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 5:14 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> > This functionality is especially useful during the testing phase. When
> > used in conjunction with Mailbox's Test Framework we can trivially conduct
> > end-to-end testing i.e. boot co-processor, send and receive messages to
> > the co-processor, then shut it down again (repeat as required).
> >
>
> I want this too!
>
> > Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
> > index 9d30809..8113c18 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
> > @@ -88,8 +88,42 @@ static ssize_t rproc_state_read(struct file *filp, char __user *userbuf,
> > return simple_read_from_buffer(userbuf, count, ppos, buf, i);
> > }
> >
> > +static ssize_t rproc_state_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *userbuf,
> > + size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> > +{
> > + struct rproc *rproc = filp->private_data;
> > + char buf[10];
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (count > sizeof(buf))
> > + return count;
> > +
> > + ret = copy_from_user(buf, userbuf, count);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return -EFAULT;
> > +
> > + if (buf[count - 1] == '\n')
> > + buf[count - 1] = '\0';
>
> I believe you can get here with count = 0.
I'm pretty sure you can't.
If you are sure that you can, if you can provide me with a way of
testing, I'd be happy to put in provisions.
> > +
> > + if (!strncmp(buf, "start", count)) {
> > + ret = rproc_boot(rproc);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "Boot failed: %d\n", ret);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > + } else if (!strncmp(buf, "stop", count)) {
> > + rproc_shutdown(rproc);
> > + } else {
> > + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "Unrecognised option: %s\n", buf);
>
> Unrecognized
What I have is correct.
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return count;
> > +}
> > +
> > static const struct file_operations rproc_state_ops = {
> > .read = rproc_state_read,
> > + .write = rproc_state_write,
> > .open = simple_open,
> > .llseek = generic_file_llseek,
> > };
>
> Part of these nits
>
> Acked-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com>
Thanks.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-03 12:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-24 13:14 [RESEND v4 0/6] remoteproc: Add driver for STMicroelectronics platforms Lee Jones
2015-11-24 13:14 ` Lee Jones
2015-11-24 13:14 ` Lee Jones
2015-11-24 13:14 ` [RESEND v4 1/6] remoteproc: dt: Provide bindings for ST's Remote Processor Controller driver Lee Jones
2015-11-24 13:14 ` Lee Jones
2015-11-24 13:14 ` Lee Jones
2015-11-25 0:07 ` Rob Herring
2015-11-25 0:07 ` Rob Herring
2015-12-28 18:33 ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-12-28 18:33 ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-12-28 18:33 ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-11-24 13:14 ` [RESEND v4 2/6] remoteproc: debugfs: Add ability to boot remote processor using debugfs Lee Jones
2015-11-24 13:14 ` Lee Jones
2015-11-27 17:00 ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-11-27 17:00 ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-11-27 17:00 ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-12-03 12:26 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2015-12-03 12:26 ` Lee Jones
2015-12-03 12:26 ` Lee Jones
2015-12-03 12:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-12-03 12:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-12-03 13:03 ` Lee Jones
2015-12-03 13:03 ` Lee Jones
2015-12-03 13:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-12-03 13:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-12-03 17:28 ` Lee Jones
2015-12-03 17:28 ` Lee Jones
2015-12-03 17:28 ` Lee Jones
2015-12-03 21:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-12-03 21:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-12-03 21:22 ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-12-03 21:22 ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-12-04 8:24 ` Lee Jones
2015-12-04 8:24 ` Lee Jones
2015-12-28 18:38 ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-12-28 18:38 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-01-12 10:53 ` Lee Jones
2016-01-12 10:53 ` Lee Jones
2015-11-24 13:14 ` [RESEND v4 3/6] remoteproc: Supply controller driver for ST's Remote Processors Lee Jones
2015-11-24 13:14 ` Lee Jones
2015-12-28 18:33 ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-12-28 18:33 ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-12-28 18:33 ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-11-24 13:14 ` [RESEND v4 4/6] MAINTAINERS: Add ST's Remote Processor Driver to ARM/STI ARCHITECTURE Lee Jones
2015-11-24 13:14 ` Lee Jones
2015-11-24 13:14 ` [RESEND v4 5/6] ARM: STiH407: Add nodes for RemoteProc Lee Jones
2015-11-24 13:14 ` Lee Jones
2015-11-24 13:14 ` [RESEND v4 6/6] ARM: STiH407: Move over to using the 'reserved-memory' API for obtaining DMA memory Lee Jones
2015-11-24 13:14 ` Lee Jones
2015-11-26 8:45 ` [RESEND v4 0/6] remoteproc: Add driver for STMicroelectronics platforms Ohad Ben-Cohen
2015-11-26 8:45 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2015-11-26 9:10 ` Lee Jones
2015-11-26 9:10 ` Lee Jones
2015-11-26 9:10 ` Lee Jones
2015-11-26 9:32 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2015-11-26 9:32 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2015-11-26 9:32 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2015-12-28 18:41 ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-12-28 18:41 ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-12-28 18:41 ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-12-29 8:23 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2015-12-29 8:23 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2015-12-29 8:23 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2016-01-12 12:30 ` Lee Jones
2016-01-12 12:30 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151203122634.GX12874@x1 \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.