All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [V2 PATCH] sparc64/gup: check address scope legitimacy
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2015 09:59:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151205095956.GA21826@ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5660C0D4.8050800@linaro.org>

> >access_ok() always returns 1.
> 
> Thanks for pointing it out. And, I didn't notice that gup is just built for
> SPARC64. I though it is built by both 64 bit and 32 bit.
> 
> A follow-up question, is there any reason to just have sparc specific fast
> gup for 64 bit not for 32 bit?
I do not know - sorry.

> >>@@ -203,6 +206,8 @@ int get_user_pages_fast(unsigned long start, int nr_pages, int write,
> >>  	addr = start;
> >>  	len = (unsigned long) nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
> >>  	end = start + len;
> >>+	if (end < start)
> >>+		goto slow_irqon;
> >
> >end can only be smaller than start if there is some overflow.
> >See how end is calculated just the line above.
> >
> >This looks like a highly suspicious change.
> 
> I'm supposed this is used to protect the overflow. I copied the code from
> other arch. Actually, every arch has this except sparc.
The the other archs are likely confused as well - there is most
likely some history behind that can be found if digging a little.

The code is not present in the generic version.

	Sam

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [V2 PATCH] sparc64/gup: check address scope legitimacy
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 10:59:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151205095956.GA21826@ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5660C0D4.8050800@linaro.org>

> >access_ok() always returns 1.
> 
> Thanks for pointing it out. And, I didn't notice that gup is just built for
> SPARC64. I though it is built by both 64 bit and 32 bit.
> 
> A follow-up question, is there any reason to just have sparc specific fast
> gup for 64 bit not for 32 bit?
I do not know - sorry.

> >>@@ -203,6 +206,8 @@ int get_user_pages_fast(unsigned long start, int nr_pages, int write,
> >>  	addr = start;
> >>  	len = (unsigned long) nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
> >>  	end = start + len;
> >>+	if (end < start)
> >>+		goto slow_irqon;
> >
> >end can only be smaller than start if there is some overflow.
> >See how end is calculated just the line above.
> >
> >This looks like a highly suspicious change.
> 
> I'm supposed this is used to protect the overflow. I copied the code from
> other arch. Actually, every arch has this except sparc.
The the other archs are likely confused as well - there is most
likely some history behind that can be found if digging a little.

The code is not present in the generic version.

	Sam

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-05  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-25 22:31 [PATCH] sparc64/gup: check address scope legitimacy Yang Shi
2015-11-25 22:31 ` Yang Shi
2015-11-25 22:45 ` [V2 PATCH] " Yang Shi
2015-11-25 22:45   ` Yang Shi
2015-12-03 20:38   ` Sam Ravnborg
2015-12-03 20:38     ` Sam Ravnborg
2015-12-03 22:23     ` Shi, Yang
2015-12-03 22:23       ` Shi, Yang
2015-12-05  9:59       ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2015-12-05  9:59         ` Sam Ravnborg
2015-11-26  0:26 ` [PATCH] " kbuild test robot
2015-11-26  0:26   ` kbuild test robot
2015-11-26  0:31   ` Shi, Yang
2015-11-26  0:31     ` Shi, Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151205095956.GA21826@ravnborg.org \
    --to=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yang.shi@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.