From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@scylladb.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: v4.4-rc4 regression with direct-io
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 21:51:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151208215109.GR20997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151208213902.GA4212@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 02:39:02PM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> Hey Jan,
>
> In my test setup this commit:
>
> 74cedf9b6c60 ("direct-io: Fix negative return from dio read beyond eof")
>
> causes a regression with XFS and the test generic/113. The test used to
> pass, but with the above mentioned commit it just hangs indefinitely.
>
> This commit went in between v4.4-rc3 and v4.4-rc4, and it looks like it was
> marked for stable?
See the tip of vfs.git#for-linus for fix...
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@scylladb.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: v4.4-rc4 regression with direct-io
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 21:51:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151208215109.GR20997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151208213902.GA4212@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 02:39:02PM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> Hey Jan,
>
> In my test setup this commit:
>
> 74cedf9b6c60 ("direct-io: Fix negative return from dio read beyond eof")
>
> causes a regression with XFS and the test generic/113. The test used to
> pass, but with the above mentioned commit it just hangs indefinitely.
>
> This commit went in between v4.4-rc3 and v4.4-rc4, and it looks like it was
> marked for stable?
See the tip of vfs.git#for-linus for fix...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-08 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-08 21:39 v4.4-rc4 regression with direct-io Ross Zwisler
2015-12-08 21:39 ` Ross Zwisler
2015-12-08 21:51 ` Al Viro [this message]
2015-12-08 21:51 ` Al Viro
2015-12-08 23:14 ` Ross Zwisler
2015-12-08 23:14 ` Ross Zwisler
2015-12-09 11:49 ` Jan Kara
2015-12-09 11:49 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151208215109.GR20997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=avi@scylladb.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=swhiteho@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.