From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
kernel@stlinux.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
ajitpal.singh@st.com, maxime.coquelin@st.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/11] ARM: STi: Register CPUFreq device
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 14:49:07 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151209091907.GF28374@ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3682335.fAt9xNcJFr@wuerfel>
On 09-12-15, 10:15, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 December 2015 14:32:01 Lee Jones wrote:
> > @@ -161,3 +166,11 @@ struct smp_operations __initdata sti_smp_ops = {
> > .smp_secondary_init = sti_secondary_init,
> > .smp_boot_secondary = sti_boot_secondary,
> > };
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * CPUFreq Registration
> > + */
> > +void init_cpufreq(void)
> > +{
> > + platform_device_register_simple("sti-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
> > +}
> >
>
> Can you please do this under drivers/cpufreq somewhere?
>
> I really don't want to any more of these in platform code. Requiring a
> device to be created just to probe the driver is really silly.
He is actually creating two device right now..
- create sti-cpufreq device
- so that sti-cpufreq driver get probed
- And fix OPPs here first and then create cpufreq-dt device
- so that cpufreq-dt driver get probed
:)
I already recommended him that he can replace the first two points by
doing things from module_init() instead. And then create cpufreq-dt
device.
--
viresh
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: viresh.kumar@linaro.org (Viresh Kumar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 08/11] ARM: STi: Register CPUFreq device
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 14:49:07 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151209091907.GF28374@ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3682335.fAt9xNcJFr@wuerfel>
On 09-12-15, 10:15, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 December 2015 14:32:01 Lee Jones wrote:
> > @@ -161,3 +166,11 @@ struct smp_operations __initdata sti_smp_ops = {
> > .smp_secondary_init = sti_secondary_init,
> > .smp_boot_secondary = sti_boot_secondary,
> > };
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * CPUFreq Registration
> > + */
> > +void init_cpufreq(void)
> > +{
> > + platform_device_register_simple("sti-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
> > +}
> >
>
> Can you please do this under drivers/cpufreq somewhere?
>
> I really don't want to any more of these in platform code. Requiring a
> device to be created just to probe the driver is really silly.
He is actually creating two device right now..
- create sti-cpufreq device
- so that sti-cpufreq driver get probed
- And fix OPPs here first and then create cpufreq-dt device
- so that cpufreq-dt driver get probed
:)
I already recommended him that he can replace the first two points by
doing things from module_init() instead. And then create cpufreq-dt
device.
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-09 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-08 14:31 [PATCH v5 00/11] cpufreq: Introduce ST's CPUFreq driver Lee Jones
2015-12-08 14:31 ` Lee Jones
2015-12-08 14:31 ` Lee Jones
2015-12-08 14:31 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable ST's PWM driver Lee Jones
2015-12-08 14:31 ` Lee Jones
2015-12-08 14:31 ` Lee Jones
2015-12-08 14:31 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable ST's Power Reset driver Lee Jones
2015-12-08 14:31 ` Lee Jones
2015-12-08 14:31 ` Lee Jones
2015-12-08 14:31 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable support for PWM Regulators Lee Jones
2015-12-08 14:31 ` Lee Jones
2015-12-08 14:31 ` Lee Jones
2015-12-08 14:31 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] ARM: STi: STiH407: Provide generic (safe) DVFS configuration Lee Jones
2015-12-08 14:31 ` Lee Jones
2015-12-08 14:31 ` Lee Jones
2015-12-08 15:03 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-08 15:03 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-08 15:37 ` Lee Jones
2015-12-08 15:37 ` Lee Jones
2015-12-08 14:31 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] ARM: STi: STiH407: Provide CPU with clocking information Lee Jones
2015-12-08 14:31 ` Lee Jones
2015-12-08 14:31 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] ARM: STi: STiH407: Link CPU with its voltage supply Lee Jones
2015-12-08 14:31 ` Lee Jones
2015-12-08 14:32 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] ARM: STi: STiH407: Provide CPU with a means to look-up Major number Lee Jones
2015-12-08 14:32 ` Lee Jones
2015-12-08 14:32 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] ARM: STi: Register CPUFreq device Lee Jones
2015-12-08 14:32 ` Lee Jones
2015-12-09 2:39 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-09 2:39 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-09 9:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-12-09 9:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-12-09 9:19 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2015-12-09 9:19 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-09 11:25 ` Lee Jones
2015-12-09 11:25 ` Lee Jones
2015-12-08 14:32 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] cpufreq: st: Provide runtime initialised driver for ST's platforms Lee Jones
2015-12-08 14:32 ` Lee Jones
2015-12-09 2:57 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-09 2:57 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-09 2:58 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-09 2:58 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-08 14:32 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] dt: cpufreq: st: Provide bindings for ST's CPUFreq implementation Lee Jones
2015-12-08 14:32 ` Lee Jones
[not found] ` <1449585124-15596-11-git-send-email-lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2015-12-09 3:52 ` Rob Herring
2015-12-09 3:52 ` Rob Herring
2015-12-09 3:52 ` Rob Herring
2015-12-08 14:32 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] MAINTAINERS: Add ST's CPUFreq driver to the STI file list Lee Jones
2015-12-08 14:32 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151209091907.GF28374@ubuntu \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=ajitpal.singh@st.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@stlinux.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@st.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.