All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Werner <andreas.werner@men.de>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Andreas Werner <andreas.werner@men.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jdelvare@suse.com,
	lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, wni@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] LM90 driver and ti tmp461 detection
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 18:09:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151210180928.GC28022@awelinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5669BB37.3050207@roeck-us.net>

...
>On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 09:49:43AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >
> >I have a DT based board yes, but i have also planed to submit my changes
> >and also wanted to implement the autodetection of the chip.
> >
> >I have also planned (or need) to implement the "n-Factor Correction" for the
> >CPU diodes. There is a register to set this value in the tmp451 and tmp461.
> >Would that make sense to add a DT property for the driver to be able
> >to set this value? What do you think?
> >
> 
> See max6697.c for some examples. Maybe we can use similar bindings.
> 

Seems to be a good way. I think I will also add the extended mode selection
via DT.

> Guenter
> 

Regards
Andy

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andreas Werner <andreas.werner@men.de>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Andreas Werner <andreas.werner@men.de>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <jdelvare@suse.com>,
	<lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>, <wni@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: LM90 driver and ti tmp461 detection
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 19:09:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151210180928.GC28022@awelinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5669BB37.3050207@roeck-us.net>

...
>On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 09:49:43AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >
> >I have a DT based board yes, but i have also planed to submit my changes
> >and also wanted to implement the autodetection of the chip.
> >
> >I have also planned (or need) to implement the "n-Factor Correction" for the
> >CPU diodes. There is a register to set this value in the tmp451 and tmp461.
> >Would that make sense to add a DT property for the driver to be able
> >to set this value? What do you think?
> >
> 
> See max6697.c for some examples. Maybe we can use similar bindings.
> 

Seems to be a good way. I think I will also add the extended mode selection
via DT.

> Guenter
> 

Regards
Andy

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-10 18:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-10 12:08 [lm-sensors] LM90 driver and ti tmp461 detection Andreas Werner
2015-12-10 12:08 ` Andreas Werner
2015-12-10 16:41 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-12-10 17:12   ` [lm-sensors] " Andreas Werner
2015-12-10 17:12     ` Andreas Werner
2015-12-10 17:43     ` Guenter Roeck
2015-12-10 18:03       ` [lm-sensors] " Andreas Werner
2015-12-10 18:03         ` Andreas Werner
2015-12-10 17:49     ` Guenter Roeck
2015-12-10 18:09       ` Andreas Werner [this message]
2015-12-10 18:09         ` Andreas Werner
2015-12-12 10:08     ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2015-12-12 10:08       ` Jean Delvare
2015-12-15 15:11       ` Andreas Werner
2015-12-15 15:11         ` Andreas Werner
2015-12-17 11:48         ` Jean Delvare
2015-12-17 11:48           ` Jean Delvare
2015-12-17 11:54           ` Andreas Werner
2015-12-17 11:54             ` Andreas Werner
2015-12-17 14:57           ` Guenter Roeck
2015-12-17 14:57             ` Guenter Roeck
2015-12-18  8:18             ` Andreas Werner
2015-12-18  8:18               ` Andreas Werner
2015-12-12 11:42 ` Andreas Werner
2015-12-12 11:42   ` Andreas Werner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151210180928.GC28022@awelinux \
    --to=andreas.werner@men.de \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
    --cc=wni@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.